Well, that's just odd. [PP article]
Zianni Vaatez
/Rage
Last month, a user named Treian officially took Party President of BGMPM. His plan? To bring back the CNC, if his plan was to basically not touch anything except the name/description and picture. (The link still leads to the BGMPM Page)
He succeeded. Naturally, the time and effort he put into rallying votes to become the PP was wasted. He hasn't done anything, he hasn't promoted anything new. In fact, I think he tried for one day, and then figured he had better things to do than play with his pet project.
Which brings up the point, why run for PP?
There are a couple reasons for running for PP,
Helping and promoting the party
Bragging rights
Just being PP
Reforming an old party
Overall, the last month has been a big waste of my time, and vote. Save the slot for someone who actually wants to do it.
Here's a newspaper article written by Treian about his plans with reforming CNC
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/cnc-rebirth-of-an-idea-rebuilding-a-nation-1984712/1/20
So, what happened to rebuilding? What happened to NOT taking the group by force? You published your intentions and then did nothing about it. 😛
It just baffles my mind, so save yourself the dismay, and vote someone else other than Treian. Most likely Connor Macleod even though he follows Norse-Fire principles but it's better than nothing. (Of course I told him we should instead lay our feet on a set of linked-beliefs or morales which he suggested.)
In other news, Manipulation, and what it can do to you!
Comments
Welcome to practically every non-Top-5 party! Where the goals are made up and the elections don't matter!
That said, it can be a big problem for eCanada when we truly aren't interested in who their leaders are.
^ That's fairly typical of top 5 parties as well imo
Yes, but at least people pay attention to the Top-5 parties.
Kronos, you shouldn't put down your own party like that.
@Kronos, I wonder if snow cone bribes would win an election. 😁
I'm still scratching my head over what you said about Connor.
As well, I wasn't aware Norsefire had any principles that anyone could follow, except 'do what you please and take these tanks.'
I'm pretty hyped about the ringing endorsement.
@Plugson
"Norsefire's vision with few specific rules and a much harder feel."
I still don't know what that 'specifically' means, Zianni. Is that a quote from something Connor wrote somewhere?
I solved the mystery Plugson....it's from a PM conversation with Zianni.
"In my opinion eCanada needs to follow one of two paths....Norsefire's vision with few specific rules and a much harder feel. It's easier to setup a community like this, but there is little attachment or sense of overall purpose.
The alternative is to setup a community based on a common set of norms. This isn't real life, but we should be able to agree on a basic set of things we believe in. This would form the philosophical and moral base of the community."
I never said which I was following I guess.
Still haven't, so I assume it is open for debate, still?
Judging from the way this election is going...we won't know this month.
CPF welcomes you...
Sorry for the misunderstanding, Plugson.
I suppose I should invest in Vague media.