The Future of ATLANTIS
![USA](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/USA.png)
Dmalicious
As of today, Romania still remains the most powerful nation in the eWorld - it's military, economy, and population dwarf countries across every corner of the Earth and they are a model of superpower governance.
However, we should begin to analyze a post-Romanian world. At it's apex, Romania controlled territories from Hungary to the Pacific, controlling a massive empire from Budapest to Hong Kong surrounded by a network of allies and puppet states.
Beginning with the downfall of Norway to a PEACE PTO and the subsequent rise of Russia, Romania and Indonesia began to fight a long a bloody war for dominance across the globe. This is common knowledge of course. However, what most citizens do not realize is that Romanian power is beginning to fade.
Last week, Romania was pushed out of South Asia and the hopes of taking Indonesia's only high-iron region, Karnataka, were crushed. This week, Indonesia has begun, along with China and Iran, a massive campaign to push Romania out of East Asia - and their efforts are succeeding. Currently, Romania only controls a small portion of China in the southeast region of the country.
And just in the last two days, Hungary has been pushing into Romania's European territories from the west, pushing deep into Romanian Ukraine in what may be a PEACE equivalent to ATLANTIS's recent overtures to South Africa - the systemic liberation of the region to secure its accession to PEACE.
I am not saying we should begin to doubt Romania or ATLANTIS and I am not saying we should join PEACE. However, it is clear to us now that a power shift is underway and we may need to re-evaluate Romania's influence in the eWorld. How will the eUSA react to a Romanian defeat? What will be our official response? What leading position, if any, will our nation play in a new world order where Indonesia and Hungary have replaced Romania as the premier military powers of the world and are we prepared for such a reality? This may be sensationalist reporting based on truth or it may just be what the eWorld may look like in a few months, but regardless of official policy, I urge the president and congress to focus on the future of ATLANTIS and the eUSA's role in it in the coming future, the issue may be more important than we think.
Thank You.
Dmalicious.
Editor of the eMerica Gazette and Proud Member of the USWP.
Comments
are you serious? Dude read the article on how PEACE have been cheating.
The whole ATLANTIS thing sucks.
PEACE succeeds because allies cooperate, and we do nothing.
I assume US fall will follow Romanian fall. We do absolutely nothing to help our allies. Why are we in ATLANTIS then? We should be neutral. Now I regret voting for Scrabman. Shouldn't we be conquering? Rr we're just going to watch the show we have no benefit from?
"We do absolutely nothing to help our allies."
Not so. The Marines and the NG 3rd Division constantly deploy to assist them.
cheated or not, the admin are not going to undo the change in territory. peace would take a hit economicly if org are banned, that is to be determined still. if thats the case, that is what atl should be preparing for, counter strike. but it has suprised me that there is no SERIOUS north american bloc. past eusa blunders i guess, i mean dumb wars.
I'm a romanian living in eRomania.
I think you put the wrong question when you ask:
"should we not change sides, because eRomania is being defeted by Peace members?"
damn, for the moment, USA is the eCountry with the most players, eRomania has best miltary force, next to Indo & Hungary. On Atlantis side, Romania is sitting next to USA and Spain; Canada, Poland and Croatia are there, too. Still, how many Atlantis countries are fighting against Peace?
Romania was 1 step away from destroying indo economy, then it happen😛 PEACE finally became an alliance: We attac Indo, but, the same day Hungary, Russia, China, Iran attacked us; for the next days, they change😛 one day russi, next day china, next iran, then russia again....
Rules of the game say we can not attack if we are under attack.
All we need from our allies is to take russia or any other country from our back, we will deal with indo ourselves.
IS THE WRONG CHOICE to change sides if your ally is in need, what if romania somehow manages and wins? will you change sides again ?
so, stop war games and start the real play, the one that matters.