Full TUP Manifesto, October 1st
![United Kingdom](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/United-Kingdom.png)
Hassan Pesaran
In this manifesto I and my party will be outlining our vision for the future of the eUK. It will cover a range of issues and reflects all of TUP’s members’ views on how we can improve the eUK and move it forward into Version 1.
Home Affairs
- The most pressing matter regarding how we will continue to run the eUK is the absence of Mayors from V1. TUP is adamant that we want to include the Mayors in some form when V1 is released. We would introduce the “Minister of Health”, who would then have “Regional Managers” under him/her. The “Minister of Health”, would take the place of the Regional Council President, who would be assigned the position by the President, like any other Minister and the “Regional Managers” would be the new Mayors. These Regional Managers would be delegated their position by the Minister of Health.
- We plan to push to introduce the “British Academy”. This would encourage all things creative within eRepublik, whether this be writing or programming. We would have a monthly award for an outstanding piece of literature or an API which helps to improve the eUK. This would be run by the Minister of Information and the winners would be voted on by notable figures within the eRepublik community who have proved themselves in either programming/writing. By promoting such an idea and offering rewards, it means the eUK would be a far more exciting place to live in.
- We would encourage discussion on the eUK National Forums by holding competitions in regions and adding small incentives to join the Forums. The Forums are integral to eRepublik and this needs to be further emphasised to citizens.
Foreign Affairs
- We want to strengthen trade agreements with the announcement of the region productivity. Just because the eUK has not been given the best resources doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be able to have a strong and stable market. We will actively contact other nations to make sure the eUK has a good supply of all resources, as well as exporting items we have in surplus. We have already begun planning for this as Squiddy, our VP, has proposed a discussion within the House of Commons
- With the new Resistance War in V1, we would do our utmost to support eAustrailia in their war for independence. When they do gain their independence, we would immediately create strong ties and support them in when their nation is in its independency.
- Actively encourage the use of Embassies as a central point of communication. We have been blessed with some fantastic MoFAs in the eUK, but we still need to allow the greater public to get involved in Foreign Affairs. We would contact other MoFAs to make them aware of our Embassies so they can get a better idea of the public opinion within the eUK.
Military
- Introduce a new “Logistics Corps”. With the introduction of a slot limit in Version 1, we want to be able to supply our troops the best way we can, regardless of this hindrance. This Logistics Corps would carry supplies and be funded by the government to back up a Paratrooper with weapons, food and gifts when and if they need them.
- Give MI6 a more feasible role in the modern eRepublik world. This would include, but not be exclusive to, a new Economic War procedure. For example, they would be involved in submitting requests for embargos and buying out commodities needed for a war, like weapons and moving tickets. This would be our first option when going to war, before actually sending in our troops to start the fighting.
Regardless of all these planned changes, what makes TUP stand out from the other competitors?
- TUP has recently won 5 regions in the Local Election. The Mayors who were elected are all extremely active and have already started implementing new ideas within their regions. A prime example of this is Siobhan Griffin, Belfast’s new Mayor, having introduced the new project “Belfast Innovation”. Similar ideas have cropped up all over the 5 TUP regions, like the improved London Council implemented by Squiddy. TUP is ready to do anything to improve the eUK, down to the smallest detail
- Some people are saying that, with V1 on the horizon, a military leader is needed. Although a certain extent of knowledge of the military is needed, I don’t think a huge amount of it is necessary. We have already implemented the fantastic War Council, which is more than capable of dealing with military situations. If you elect TUP into Presidency, you can be sure that we would give the military the best support we can and back the decisions of the vastly experienced MoD and MoFA.
- Lack of experience within TUP in general has been cited as a reason not to vote for us. I disagree with this statement, as come Election Day, V1 will be right around the corner and no-one will be experienced with the new abilities and options that are open to a President. TUP has already shown innovation and ingenuity, so we would be the best party capable of dealing with the new and unprecedented situations. We will have a fresh perspective for a fresh new game.
Finally, TUP aims for a more united nation. Regardless of political party, we are all fighting for a stronger eUK. This requires co-ordination between parties, whether this is getting the best congressmen or ministers for the job. Political Party simply does not factor into the equation when deciding these positions.
So vote TUP to put the Unity back into United Kingdom!
Comments
Hrm, not quite what I expected.
Home Affairs 1 - What about all the other roles of mayors?
Home Affairs 2 and 3 - How would this succeed, where other similar ideas have fizzled out after a few weeks.
Military 1 - Not sure how this would improve matters. The SO would only be able to carry 10 items.
Military 2 - Doesn\'t the MOD deal with all that (don\'t quote me on that though)
\"TUP has recently won 5 regions in the Local Election. \"
How is this relevent to the GES. Surely LEs are irrelevant to party affiliation.
\"Although a certain extent of knowledge of the military is needed, I don’t think a huge amount of it is necessary. \"
You may well have a point, but I\'d just like to point out that W9K is far from a one trick pony
\"ome Election Day, V1 will be right around the corner and no-one will be experienced with the new abilities and options that are open to a President\"
I disagree, theres a lot we can do to prepare for what we know is coming - surely this should be one of the key aims of governmen in the coming weekst.
\"Political Party simply does not factor into the equation when deciding these positions.\"
Small nitpicking point - How is this different to the other 2 major parties
Say that the Aussie Resistance war happened while WW1 was on still. Would you send troops over to Australia over Romania?
Is it just Australia that you want freed? What of Switzerland whom our Paratroopers thought bravely in the battle of Bellinzona?
What is your stance on Irish Neutrality?
Have you decided on who would you like to be in your cabinet?
Home Affairs 1:
The \"Regional Managers\" would completely replace Mayors, they would do all the duties that current Mayors do.
Home Affairs 2 & 3:
I\'ve recently proposed 2, which has been well received. I believe with extra work these things can go through and make an impact. Regarding 3, some of our Mayors have already started on similar things and are looking to build on them.
Military 1:
10 items is still double, which is alot more.
LEs:
It shows we have members who are capable of doing their jobs and are intelligent enough to introduce new things.
Political Party Preference:
I agree, but im saying that TUP would continue this trend and that its a good thing
\"How is this relevent to the GES. Surely LEs are irrelevant to party affiliation.\"
All we\'re saying is that we have strong members who are ready to lead and have proven that they are good at what they do.
\"Say that the Aussie Resistance war happened while WW1 was on still. Would you send troops over to Australia over Romania? \"
I think we would need to see how WW1 has panned out. Alot is going to start happening when V1 is released and we need to be able to look at the situation, and see how to move forward. I dont think its a very good idea to committ yourself to either without knowing situation.
\"Is it just Australia that you want freed? What of Switzerland whom our Paratroopers thought bravely in the battle of Bellinzona? \"
Of course we would support other nations who are willing to fight for their freedom.
\"What is your stance on Irish Neutrality?\"
Ireland are their own nation. They have the right to make their own decisions, and how they want to act. I dont believe we should pressure them into doing anything they dont feel comfortable with. I would, however, give advice and assistance with problems that they may have.
\"Have you decided on who would you like to be in your cabinet?\"
I am honestly still deciding on this. Its obviously all theoretical, but I would definitely keep the strong members we have at the moment.
\"We would introduce the “Minister of Health”, who would then have “Regional Managers” under him/her. The “Minister of Health”, would take the place of the Regional Council President, who would be assigned the position by the President, like any other Minister and the “Regional Managers” would be the new Mayors. These Regional Managers would be delegated their position by the Minister of Health.\"
This is already being discussed in congress, so you can\'t say it\'s a party policy, same goes for the British Academy. Also, the MoH shouldn\'t be solely responsible for delegating the position as these people would then not be representing their region. That\'s my opinion though.
I agree with the forums push. Also agree with everything in FA, nothing I can see that\'s not good there.
I\'m not sure that MI6 and possible functions should really be discussed in a public manifesto, really. Bit of a breach of secrecy. Good idea though. However, regarding the military, things like logistic corps wouldn\'t/shouldn\'t be down to the president or congress. Organisation of the military is separate from politics in this country at the moment and would be best kept that way.
Regarding the war council, the president is on the war council and should have sufficient military knowledge of his own to ensure that the rest of the war council is doing what it should.
Great manifesto though, really.
Why \"British Academy\" (sounds like something to do with those dreadful Oscars or BAFTAs) and \"Logistics Corps\", when it should be \"Royal Academy\" and \"Royal Logistic (note the lack of an \"s\") Corps\"?
I think you\'re forgetting something rather fundamental about the United KINGDOM! We already have Royal Ordnance, and so the precedent is set.
Oh, where did my earlier post go?
You never said anything...
Thats strange, I\'m sure I did...it was something to the effect of looks good.
Ah well,
It looks good.
Good to hear, and I agree - it looks good, and the fact that it can spark this kind of cross-party discussion makes it even better