Join the new world

I love to comment , but am not congresmen 🙁

"Some parties are behaving in a suspicious way, and they more than others, need to show everybody that the suspicions are false."

"It is not my goal to accuse anybody"

Objection! There is a contradiction in voice's statement!
-Phoenix Wright "Objection" theme plays

Adam: add your CV, the quality of complete lack of logic. you apparently do not know what is a contradiction

AR: I see no contradiction. Voice accuses nobody, she simply asks those who are inactive to start participating.

You are accusing people of behaving in a suspicious way.

I rest my case.

1. this is not an accusation, it is an observation
2. i said some parties, i did not say people behave in suspicious way
3. even if it was an accusation, it is not my goal. I did not say i did not accuse anybody, i said that it is not my goal

Accuse: To charge with a shortcoming or error.
"Some parties are behaving in a suspicious way"

It doesn't matter if you meant "parties" or "people", because it's all the same when it comes to an accusation. Try wording your articles better next time.

Picking apart an argument based on wording....chump move

I would bet the majority of what I own that you know exactly what she meant by her statement. voice isn't writing an English paper, lay off

I like Voice, she's got the eye of the investigative journalist.

I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired of this PTO shit.

There were some elections. The "Serbian" party won them.

If you don't like the Serbian party being in control then construct arguments, policies and incentives to make people vote for your party. Get organised, get people active and create a vision that we can strive to build together.

AR: there are no charges. there is an observation. but that is one point you are trying to debate, lets assume for argument sake that yes that was an accusation to (some) parties. how would that contradict my statement that the (supposed) accusation is not the goal of the article...

one can accuse, and that accusation not be the goal of the article... there is still no contradiction!

your attempt to prove contradiction ==> BIG FAIL

@DDV

You think if we do all these things they walk away whistling Dixie and leave us alone?

They have the numbers, they will be in power as long as they want to be. Doesn't matter if we think they are right or wrong.

We could have the best arguments, policies and incentives and we would still lose in the elections. You could agree with us 100% and we would still lose the elections.

voice, the fact that you used the phrase "BIG FAIL" is, in itself, losing the argument.

that is your new trick 🙂 apparently you can't reply 🙂 another BIG FAIL

Well, I learned all about not responding from you, voice

i know you got stuck 🙂 not my proble, you put yourself in that stupid position by talking about a contradiction that does not exist 🙂 ciao

Hey, now, voice. eNew Zealand an English speaking country.

Don't use words like "ciao". It's traitorous.

Adam: so you are trying to escape the embarrassment of "my contradiction" 🙂

LOL..

btw CIAO is English also.. i should not teach you your own language
but look here it is in the dictionary
from Merriam Webster
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ciao

...No, it's Italian, not English. Just because English speakers use it, doesn't make it English. I'm not sure why I have to explain such a fundamental thing to you.

Also, what contradiction? That you say it's not your goal to accuse anyone, yet you constantly accuse people every time you open your mouth? Such as calling them wolves and this entire article?
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/we-are-all-kiwis--1561500/1/20

I wouldn't say that's much of a contradiction. More like proof that you're delusional.

No it is in Merriam Webster, it is English.. in linguistics this is called a loan word... if you insist it is not you have to remove half of the english words..
in your last comment verb USE came from French;, sure from french, explain from french, fundemental from french, contradiction from french, accuse from french, people from french, article from french proof from french delusion from french

citing another article is irrelevant, and does not prove that my goal in this article is to accuse anyone

and btw, that article has no accusation/// i used the word (some) i criticized behaviors (from all sides).. and i did not mention wolves!!! the word wolve did not appear in the article cited

"Loan word" means it's not English, but it's taken from another language and used in our vernacular. Still not helping your cause there. Not to mention, all of those words aren't the same spoken in French, and I'm betting a lot of French words don't originate from France.

It's not irrelevant, because you didn't specify you weren't trying to accuse anyone in this article. You only said you weren't trying to.

I said "and this entire article". Pay closer attention. You called them wolves in this article:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-bad-intentions-new-zealand-s-pp-elections-1573647/1/20

Nice try, though.

Loan word means it is Englihs, loaned from another language. It is in the DICTIONARY! Full Stop. i suggest you read something about linguistics before even trying to debate me on the issue 🙂

so you changed the article
after citing an article were even the word "wolves" did not appear...
still that one was a past article.. that does not mean that my Goal in this article is to accuse any one, and i did, in this article i did not accuse anyone 🙂

the last article cited is "Bad Intention" if you do not understand what this article about, you are likely to make silly of yourself.. wolves is an accusation??? c'est vraiment stupide 🙂
i said "party of wolves".. i did not name anybody there... i did not say eSerbs are wolves.. and that will not be an accusation nor an insult!

It's not English. "Loanword" means a word borrowed from another language and "at least partially" naturalized. This means that it has become part of our vernacular, but no one would associate it with being English. How about YOU learn linguistics before professing to be an expert on it?

I never changed the article. Both of these articles point towards your accusations towards the eSerbians in the past. Also, as I've said, it might not have been your goal in "this" article to do so, but you didn't say that. You only said your goal is not to accuse anyone. You didn't specify.

You said it was a party of wolves. Which party were you talking about then, if not the eSerbians? Also, calling some a "wolf" is an accusation. You're likening their actions and ways to that of a pack of wolves.

tl;dr: Which party is made up of wolves? Answer this.

it might not have been your goal in "this" article to do so, but you didn't say that. You only said your goal is not to accuse anyone. You didn't specify.


LOL, nice try to escape the embarrassment of being shown so illogical.. if i am to use your own logic, i did not either specify that i accuse them in the other articles..

you really need to learn
1. a little about linguistics
2. a little about logic

wolf is an accusation?? LOL x2
why it is an accusation?
what is wrong with wolves?

I think your grammar is embarrassing, to be honest.

As I've said, which party is made up of wolves, and what makes them wolves?

Answer these two questions, or you have no room to talk about "escaping embarrassment".

it is not you who decide .. answer first, ask second

I asked first.

you are childish

You're one to talk.