An argument; Opposition to "Lucky Seven"
![USA](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/USA.png)
Hale26
![](http://media.merchantcircle.com/5841557/shop%20logo_full.jpeg)
Lucky 7; Excellent in principle. But, in practice....
Following the latest PTO-free Congressional elections, there were rumors spreading around about a push to reform the Work Tax implemented by the last Congress. While the WT has always been starkly reminded to us through our 4pm factory clickings, it has been a particularly covered issue as of late. Our Tax-Per-Click has shot up rapidly to 3.15 USD per click, due largely to the recent spat of Contests. These same contests damned us into terrible warfare performance, leading many to question just how does this money we earn from the WT benefit our war effort. Some have even asked if this money is even going towards the war effort. Being USAF myself, I can easily refute the rumor that was spreading around that the USAF branches are getting more funding. No worries; USAF isn’t going to get any more of our money for a long, long time.
Unfortunately, that seems to be the only one of these two rumors that I can dispel. As seen in this Discussion Thread, the push I heard of for lower WT has came to light. The proposition of this idea jumped quickly into the discussion, citing the various effects of the WT on the populace. How the Marines have left, how the Newbs are being hurt, how Communes cannot operate...etc.
America, I am not here to tell you that the pain the proposition talks of isn’t there.
I am here to tell you that this pain is worth it.
![](http://i1270.photobucket.com/albums/jj612/Hale266/0367e1cd-c513-4364-8a0d-21be3e2778ca_zps47bbfb55.jpg)
To elaborate, I must take a few steps back in eHistory. Approximately to the time right before the Oblige administration.
At this time, we were between a rock and a hard-place, so to speak. Past FA policy had damned us into one of the worst positions we’d ever been in as a team. The failure of CoT as a whole (ourselves not excluded in the least) to move on EDEN nations had ended up in a 20% damage pit. For victory to be obtained, we had to day in day out, defeated 60% of the world. Needless to say, that was not being done.
We had no Congress. We were occupied completely.
As time progressed, now back after Oblige had won elections, an opening had made itself apparent to us. Hungary, a nation we have never lost a direct 1 on 1 war with, had extended their empire beyond what they could control. Through an off-hand RW in Alaska and a hard-fought victory in Oaxaca, hope was in sight. Hungary had two, strong nations opposed to it, ready and able to begin one of the largest empire dissolutions Erep history.
...But then, we remembered the pit. The 20% deep hole that was dug by our past, now fruitless policies as both a Nation and an Alliance. Even while we held the massive mechanical advantage in terms of fronts, our damage was nothing compared to Hungary’s.
And this, eAmerica, is what leads us to the first step towards whale-esque warfare. President Oblige requested around 1-2 million USD from the reserves to ensure that Hungary could not force us back into our metaphorical pit. We obliged (heh. Punny) him, spent the amount and decimated the Hungarian Empire. They were out of Russia, America, Mexico and the most of the Ukraine. Not to mention, our efforts helped the French secure a Congress that month. As well, we had now formed the “Great Wall of Mexico”; A vital tool, even now.
To cut to the point, we had found a way to defeat the odds. By using supreme strategy backed up by monetary aid, we could survive this war. This proved true yet again when we destroyed the Serbian Empire. They too were removed from America. They too had their empire destroyed, their politics turned upside down and internal divisions shown off to the world.
![](http://i1270.photobucket.com/albums/jj612/Hale266/0367e1cd-c513-4364-8a0d-21be3e2778ca_zps47bbfb55.jpg)
Now, wtf was the point of that whole speech? To drive in the point:
Even with RW blitz opportunities on our side, victory is not assured. Until the 20% damage divide is gone, money must be used to ensure we hold a fighting place in the world.
This is where the Fiscal Solvency Protection Act comes in. The FPSA mandates we keep a 10% WT till the reserves hit 10 million USD. By default, it also prepares us for more of the monetary-backed warfare that we have seen in the past. The question the opposition originally posed to the 10% was~ Is this really worth it?
![](http://i1270.photobucket.com/albums/jj612/Hale266/0367e1cd-c513-4364-8a0d-21be3e2778ca_zps47bbfb55.jpg)
Well, it depends. See, our income at the moment is equal to that of Serbia, our largest enemy. Keep in mind; This doesn’t mean that Serbia is equal to us in terms of warfare advantages. Rather, due to Serbia’s multiple RW openings and chokeholds, this means we have an advantage.
Serbia - (xRW+US+ALLIES+USD)= VICTORY
Now, take away the monetary side of this equation. Lets say we were to implement the “Lucky 7” proposal, outlined and supported by the Federalist Party. Alright, so, we now earn less money than Serbia. If we choose to spend money, our chances of success are questionable.
Serbia- (xRW+US+ALLIES+LUSD)= UNCERTAINVICTORY
![](http://i1270.photobucket.com/albums/jj612/Hale266/0367e1cd-c513-4364-8a0d-21be3e2778ca_zps47bbfb55.jpg)
Naturally, like all bills in Congress, the Lucky 7 Proposal has a PRO to this CON. The base pro is that newbs will able to survive and that many e
😜at Americans will come home. It will end the mass exodus out of eAmerica that is clearly damaging our nation on a whole.
Now, that may all sound convincing. But, take into account the following two facts;
1. Wipe of our nation, which can easily occur if we don’t prepare to launch a long-term monetary war, hurts our newbs much more. How fun do you think it is to enter a game, supporting your nation in a RW which is being crushed? How enticing do you think it is to play a game where you must fight for your opressors, unwillingly ignorant to the fact that you can move somewhere else? How fun must it be to try time and time again through wasting your weapons, your USD and your energy to liberate that one state?
Answer; Not very fun. As proven in states such as Bulgaria, newb population goes down greatly when longterm occupation ensues. Having a 7% WT only minorly allevies newb pain, while ensuring massive doubt is cast upon our war effort. Occupation is not something to be played with, people. Also, I believe now is the time where I mention that eAmerica has the strongest monetary newb-support network I’ve ever seen.
![](http://i1270.photobucket.com/albums/jj612/Hale266/0367e1cd-c513-4364-8a0d-21be3e2778ca_zps47bbfb55.jpg)
2. There is no “Mass Exodus”. As Kemal states here, we have not lost the massive amounts of people like the Lucky 7 proponents like to portray. Yes, there have been vocal departures. But those were of people who had lost faith in us, as a Congress. They simply do not see the reasoning behind this. In essence, a solid point of the Lucky 7 proposal is that people don’t know why we have the FSPA and don’t trust the people who made it. As a Congress, it is our job to show people logic where there is logic. Coming from a Populist party here, I’m telling you, you cannot change course because you as a body are doing a sh*tty job at explaining why something has to be. True populism involves direct communication with the peoples. You do not to feed off their fears and mistrusts. You hear those fears and mistrusts, then show them the logic behind it all. Granted, that process is hard. But seriously here, are we going to deny our side a fighting chance because we don’t feel like an uphill battle?
The simple fact of the matter is that eAmerica can handle this tax. Our support networks are strong, our resolve can be formed and our options are grim. Just because we’ve done a bad job at explaining why we need a 10% tax doesn’t mean that we get to deny logic.
If we want to stay on the map, we must have this. Wipe is not an option. Wipe will kill our newbs, will put our FA prospects down to zero (who wants to work with the losing side?) and will not heal the base concerns much of our player base has.
![](http://i1270.photobucket.com/albums/jj612/Hale266/0367e1cd-c513-4364-8a0d-21be3e2778ca_zps47bbfb55.jpg)
Lucky 7 seeks to ease your concerns and restore your trust. That is a good-hearted venture. Sadly, what the proponents of Lucky 7 don’t see is that they are doing that through nation-endangering appeasement. Through the denial or ignoring of the base logic that drove this into existence.
To my fellow Congressmen voting yes on this bill;
I get where you're coming from and the good intentions you have.
However, we must remember that it is our job to explain the needs behind what we have done. The FPSA was done with just cause and logic, as illustrated above. No matter how badly we explain that just cause and logic, the just cause and logic remains.
I urge you to consider what you have just voted upon after reading my two counter-arguments above. Consider why you are doing this, what this will accomplish and the damage it will reap.
A Lucky 7 won't get us out of this mess. Rather, in the point of view of mine and many others, it will get us deeper into it.
![](http://micevhill.com/attachments/Image/congressional_seal.png)
~Hale26
WTP Congressman
Comments
Voted!
First for populism; repeal the FSPA immediately thereby restoring eCongress's ability to change the tax rate as situations evolve. There is no substantive reason to bind this and future sessions of congress with the whims of a previous session of the eAmerican Legislature.
Regarding the debunking of "mass exodus" bear in mind nearly every party has lost members to foreign powers due to the enactment of the FSPA act; including many of the t6 parties.
Once FSPA is repealed hopefully eAmerican MU's and citizens will return to help liberate the eUSA.
Tiamati, Congress is open to change the tax rate as situations evolve. The FSPA is a law; Laws can easily be repealed. Just need 50%+1 and you're swimming.
Yes, every party has lost people. But, as I mentioned, a common trend was that those people said they were "Fed up with the US Government." The only leavers were vocal and had lost faith in government. This 10% tax making sense, their leaving is the fault of our poor communication skills. Rather than give into their fears, I'm trying to communicate why we have this tax to uninformed parties. That's my job.
As I said, lowering the tax to 7% only endangers the sustainability of our war effort. It doesn't restore faith in the Gov. Only we, Congressmen, can do that.
(Plus, 7% will not make people leave 1%, if that's the reason cited. As well, the ta😜er-click rate is going to go down soon.)
You're trying to argue that it's worth the pain and it's the wrong argument. Most players just want to have a good time which means making enough money to be successful and level up. The WT eliminates that possibility. The income/click may have skyrocketed, but I bet the click rate has declined. You lost about a couple dozen clicks in my case!
Yes, there are some players who aren't effected by the state of the nation. But, as seen by pre-wipe America and after wipe America, wipe is not an option. Many newbs die during wipe, many low-level players give in, other players stop fighting out of futility, some leave the nation...etc
All that is backed up by egov, as well. We are no longer the #3 nation that we were before the wipe.
I'm happy to see you can stand wipe. But, most can't mate.
"PTO free"
oRly
and stupid, naming a tax after some dumb show that will be cancelled in 2 episodes
It is a pretty terrible show
Wait. Who's a PTO?
INSURGIO~
More scare tactics, as if we don't have cash. Unbelievable.
Yes, because people use walls of text without pictures to scare people. That's clearly how that works.
/end sarcasm.
Till we see a solid policy change (Rea😛Acceptance of Wipe) or a FA miracle we're going to be prepared to wage this monetary-backed war long-term. Also, something you probably aren't factoring into your "we have cash" idea; Worst case scenarios and Empire destruction. Getting Poland out isn't what it's going to take alone. We are now TWO's #1 target.
Better start work on those 1-liners, John. They're starting to get almost as bad as your credibility.
[removed]
going to 7% doesn't help me at all really. This whole tax thing is admins doing. searching for balance. fail
If I thought a lower rate would pass I would have gone for the lower rate.
Yes, so you decided to attempt to pass a law aimed at appeasing people. Instead of showing them the hard logic behind this, the state of our side militarily, why we're here and our economic opponent's income, you are attempting to calm people through giving them what they want. Not even; You're only giving them a bit of what they want, at the risk of the sustainability of our war effort.
Tyler, I get why you're doing this. I don't think the Feds are doing this to be the "We axed the WT party!". You're doing this to genuinely help out.
But, what you're not seeing is that you cannot help the nation handle WT through surrendering them to their fears. The hard truth is that we must convey this logic to a pissed playerbase. Nothing less should be done.
I find it interesting that the proponents of your law until now haven't bothered to attempt a civil discussion or explanation to the people. Until this article all I've seen is trolling and insulting of the people. This repeal attempt fell short. I can live with that. We tried to respond to the concerns of the people.
And, on the other hand, I find that tragic. Granted, Congress tried in varying extents. Tenshi got an article up, we commented on shouts ...etc.
But really, we as a group didn't give our whole to this uphill battle. Doesn't hurt that we already had a bad reputation, to start with.
Neverless, the appeal of logic and reasoning on the grounds of an uninformed populace wasn't proper or reasonable. Again, coming from a party which has populism rooted in a lot of our ideas and voting structure, giving into fears is just that; Giving into fears. It became abundantly clear after only a few pages of the Lucky 7 discussion that what was needed was not an ammendment, but rather, an explanation to the public.
I'm hoping that this has now been provided.
~INSURGIO
WE NEEDZ ZEH MONEH!!!! That is all I care about. 😛
~INSURGIO
Meow! ♥
[removed]
I've Played Enough Call Of Duty to Know this is all going to turn out well In the end with The USA coming out on Top.
I agree with your point. I wish you had made it more clearly.
Psh, what's more clear than a wall of text with few graphics Gnil? ^_~
The piano has been drinking... not me.
Hale, that was one of the better articles I've read in ages. Thanks for spending the time.
I tend to think a solid and growing reserve is an effort that trumps most everything. There's always saving for a purpose. But saving for the unforeseen emergency, the emergency we can't always expect or imagine, is cause enough to ALMOST always prioritize saving (Reserves).
Remember the gold standard? I wonder where those folks who fondly recall the gold standard sit on the issue of deep reserves. And why.
Never mind me. Voted, two thumbs up. W due respect to those friends above who disagree. Just a personal moniker, strong cash reserves.
Thanks for lending it a read Candor o/
Yes, but for me to run my factory (and for everyone else with default companies to run theirs), I still lose money by WAMing instead of going to the market. I would expect there to be boatloads of people with iron factories (iirc, creating it was part of the tutorial set of missions), but right now it would cost me 2.91cc to WAM and produce 42 units. There are 27 pages of WRM at 0.05, so even if I wanted the WRM to create weapons or to donate to my MU, I could buy 42 units for 2.10cc. If I wanted to sell them for cash, I would only be able to get 1.68cc. Lower the tax to 7%, and I /might/ work (and you'll get 2.10ish from everyone who is in my situation, which is 90% of players who don't buy gold). Lower the tax to 5% and I /will/ work. Leave it where it is, and you get no WAM tax from me.
If the intent is to shrink the economy, then the argument in the article is sound. If the intent is to actually raise money, then higher rates will continue to result in less WAMage (and a collection of 0cc).
If you're not making any money selling $20hamburgers, charging $40 won't get you more income (with rare exceptions http://gothamist.com/2008/05/20/175_hamburger_o.php
Thanks for commenting. Few points of order I have to address on your example though;
Some of the lower Q factories, for the record, were already unprofitable before the High WT. It is generally not recommended to have those unless you intend on upgrading them.
As for Iron factories; That is the lowest, and most unprofitable, Q of WRM factory. Again, before the switch these were not recommended. Rather, it was recommended that you complete the missions with them, sell them and buy a WRM plant with a higher Return on Investment. (I believe)
WT didn't kill those; Erep overproduction did.
The argument I make in this article is that wipe (lack of bonuses) hurts us much, much more than a high WT. Wipe kills newbs through their feeling of futility, hurts your factories through lack of bonuses and drives away skilled political talent (as seen with Canada). Individually, some can weather wipe very well. On a national scale though, wipe is to be avoided.
(And yes, wipe would be an end result. Our battles can only be won through spending. Our reserves, while strong, can easily run low before a FA switch occurs. Congress needs a heavy stream of income if we intend to wage this war longterm. Not to mention; We only now equal Serbia's income. Without this tax we would be at a disadvantage to our chief rival.)
Side note~ If you need help making a profit in these conditions, feel free to PM me an overview of your companies and training grounds. Second pair of eyes could help, no?
Voted, good, concise article.