Ambrose Didymus nominates for India United PP
![South Korea](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/India.png)
Ambrose Didymus
Party President nominee Ambrose Didymus delivered this address earlier today:
"Good afternoon eIndia, my name is Ambrose Didymus and I am running to become the Party President of eIndia.
Party President's have two roles.
First, a party president's job is to select the party candidate who runs for President and determine which party candidates run for Congress.
The second and most important job of a party president is to consolidate the strength of our republik through a strong community.
I am sure all Party President candidates are capable of the first role, but it is in the second that I believe I can accomplish far more effectively than any of my worthy opponents.
When you go to the polls:
Vote for the candidate who has made the most impact on your experience in eIndia.
Vote for the candidate who you have seen encourage community growth.
Vote for the candidate who you believe will be able to make tough, thoughtful decisions about eIndia's future.
Vote for Ambrose Didymus."
Comments
Voted.
we will see who wins as the vote for candidate part is well suited to me as well. may the best man win
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/blazed-for-pp-of-india-united-776412/1/20
make up your mind, people of india, based on that article also
Good luck!
@Robert - In a republik that has only 1 party, it is not the job of the Party President to create policy. The focus (as is stated in the article) in a one party state turns to fostering a better community.
My actions over the last month more than make up for any perceived "lack of substance".
I invite both Blazed and Ambrose for a public debate on this! The various News papers can cover the debate.
http://eindia.forumotion.com/party-forums-f9/pp-polls-for-india-united-april-09-public-debate-t790.htm
@Ambrose- You're quite right actually, I am very sorry. I didn't just sit back and gather information about the situations and people in eIndia before I dived straight into it's politics.
Perhaps it would have helped if you put what's on the forum (link in comment from JackJack above) in the article?
Sincere apologies again,
Robert.