[TTH] Congressional Rebellion?
Franklin Stone
Join the People's military the Bear Cavalry.
Join the People's forums, Socialist Freedom Party Forum.
Sixx Sense with Nikki Sixx
Pistol Pete AKA Frank Eaton
The other day while in discussion with a friend it seemed as though we had nothing in common when it came to politics, except it was GLORIOUS to see the Sooners lose another for Big Game Bob, but in the end, we totally agreed. However, when I mentioned what I thought was the Military Arm of their Party I was quickly informed that they did not have a Military Arm. Now the Socialist Freedom Party has long maintained that the Bear Cavalry is not the Military Arm of the SFP, yet during the December Rebellion of 2016 Congress used the gossamer connection between BC and SFP to Blacklist SFP members who had simply privately contributed to a private MU. Now I mostly blame the Wiki article SFP Bear Cavalry for this misconception, but I want to give credit where credit is due, to those who crave all the credit and so I give full credit to Pfieffer.
Now back to non-Party Military Units. Easy Company has long maintained they are an Apolitical Private Military Unit while creating a political party. DeepChill, (I love y'all Chill but...) has a hard time keeping it that way since the most active political figures are in EZC and I think you will also find most are USWP members, supported by the fact that Pfieffer's cabinet was packed with them which was his way of asking them to be his Palace Guard, after all, he is the Prince of something or other. Now I am pretty sure if you ask Chill and the Party President of the USWP they will both say, 'EZC is not the party MU for the USWP.'
My point here is that there is no such thing as an Apolitical Private Military Unit. Every MU in America is filled with Citizens who belong to one party or the other. Commanders like Chill can say EZC is not political and do everything they can to keep politics out of their unit, but in the end, everyone in the unit has loyalty to one party or the other. Some of them may even be loyal to foreign lands.
Over in Public Congressional Proceedings there are three threads They are: Reinstate Dioism as the National eReligion of the eUSA, [Vote] Reinstate Dioism as State Religion, and [Discussion] Blacklist the Heretics or: Dioist Inquisition 2016 part 2). Now it seems as though these measures are not attracting much support, however, I see several things that need to be pointed out. First, notice how quickly these went through a Congress that is normally as slow as molasses in winter. Second, I am pretty sure Mr. Aundel is a Dioist. Third, notice that those in the threads calling for a Dioist Revolt, followed by an Inquisition and the Blacklisting of heretics are the same friends he wish to put in as 'placeholders' while he consolidated power in his hands.
So in a Massive Multiplayer Online ROLE PLAYING GAME the meta-government controls the eUSA Congress on an outside forum that is awash in bottom feeding Homophobic bullies and Administrators who abuse their powers (Cititation: Discussions / Re: [Discussion] Amnesty Bill of 2016 and Favorite Quotes) we are currently seeing a sore loser try to take his revenge. Using a Congress which through the Dictator Law controls the in-game American Congress. Mr. Arundel need not plop his ass into the big chair he simply needs to sit back and let his minions Blacklist those who do not convert to Dioism and control Congress. Now ask yourself, 'What would have happened if he had won and consolidated all power in his hands.' While demeaning the Socialist Freedom Party for trying an RL belief in the game it seems they have brought an RL belief in terrorism.
IMHO, what is happening in Congress currently is nothing short of rebellion against the Dictator duly elected by the People. It is a Blacklisting offense as grievous as the December Rebellion. A Rebellion led by a radical religion that wishes to control Congress through terror. A terroristic religion of which Mr. Arundel is a member. Yet not a one of those citizens will be Blacklisted. Maybe he is not the leader of the Dioist Terrorist in Congress but he supports them simply by belonging to the same religion. If you are a Congress member, no matter your party, I advise voting no to all current and any such future terroristic measures because you may be next.
Join the Revolution, get out and vote!
C'est la vie, mon chéri, smoke 'em if you got 'em...
...it's 4:20 somewhere.
Strength & Honor
Comrade Cowboy Frank
Socialist Freedom Party
Bear Cavalry, MACV/SOG
Commanding Officer
Headquarters Company
1st Regiment, Bear Cavalry
Red Zepplin Squadron
Comments
[TTH] Congressional Rebellion?
https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/2612441/1/20
READ | VOTE |SHOUT
VV
ezc is apolitical in the fact that they do not use their military power to influence politics.
mmmhmmmm
Never said EZC has or would use its power, doesn't mean their members aren't political and wouldn't use their power elsewhere. It is fairly easy to slip off the EZC uniform and join a rebellion. Remember? You have to be a member of the MU which started the revolt in order to fight in it.
o/
Actually EZC, the military unit is apolitical, still is and always will be. The members of EZC, on the other hand can freely join whatever political party they want, hell EZC probably has more SFP members in their rank than Bear Cavalry.
Sadly, that is probably true. I am sure there are other parties represented also. However, I still believe USWP has the largest contingent and by default will almost always go the USWP way.
No, we have more Feds than USWP right now.
Interesting....
Before I read this, I can tell it's controversial. Look at the number of comments.
seven comments by yourself... Are you putting the con in controversial, because all I read is frankie still has his hard on for pfieffer
It's Mr. Antisocial.
How's it going?
Lets analyze the list of Admins in EZC shall we... Deepchill EZC Apolitical Party, Gnilraps USWP, MelissaRose Fed, WhydoIbotherToo Fed, what4 BSP... YEP, USWP runs the joint...
We could expand into the officer corp that has members of AMP, BSP, FED, SFP, USWP, EZC Apolitical... No one party controls EZC, I would argue that our diversity of party affiliation ensures that we don't favor any party in particular.
As for having our members in Cabinet positions, did you ever think it was because the PEOPLE are qualified for the position in question and that it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that he/she is a member of EZC?
[removed]
I lost every race I ever ran, against MU commanders. I was better qualified, in some of those cases.
I'd be undefeated, if you dismiss those. MUs can influence the way people vote.
What election specifically and who beat you?
https://www.erepublik.com/en/main/party-elections
I'm not fronting my friends out, to prove a point. Clearly, there is a bias created.
What month? directing me to look at Party Elections doesn't tell me who ran against you. Maybe they were more well liked by your party.. maybe they ran a better campaign. Maybe your party didn't like something you said during campaigning. Hell, that would be like me saying I lost the SFP election the month I ran against Jude because Bear Cav influenced the vote. Get real bro.. EZC doesn't meddle in politics. We see a political post on the MU wall in game or somewhere on our forum outside the political section, we remove it. As anyone in EZC, they will tell you we are quite strict about it.. Franklin knows just how strictly we mod those things.
I can't believe you don't see how that creates bias.
First thank you for this information, it has been quite illuminating.
Those are the Admins of EZC and not the eUSA Forum? I never said USWP controlled EZC, if I did I apologize. I said USWP seems to control Congress and they don't do it alone, the Feds help, the BSP helps when it feels like it. Yes, EZC -thanks to Chill- is mostly apolitical. Yes, your diversity is one of the reasons your the #1 MU. Yes, the community of EZC influences how each Soldier votes during Dictator elections when you can vote anonymously and outside your party.
Again, believe I said it was because the most active Citizens who are political are easy members and each one deserved the posting Pfeiffer was offering. However, wasn't it also for political points? No, it shouldn't matter what your MU or your Political Party.
As I said EZC is the gold standard in every aspect and all done with no government help and if I knew how they did it I would replicate it in a heartbeat.
_7
How else would you interpret this? ' DeepChill, (I love y'all Chill but...) has a hard time keeping it that way since the most active political figures are in EZC and I think you will also find most are USWP members,'
sure seems like you are trying to say EZC and USWP are one and the same..
Ah...it means Chill has a hard time but seems to manage to keep EZC apolitical, especially when a Dictator Candidate during his live stream says -and I paraphrase, 'EZC is apolitical ,but I am going to post a VOTE FOR ME on the MU Shout Wall just to see what happens.'
Citation:
https://beam.pro/JSPfeiffer
Yet he did not do so
Okay.
In the stream he says he did, then a few minutes later he talks about the response he got to it. Believe what you see and hear or not.
Your boner for Pfeiffer is weird.
That's because he causes more trouble than a box of doughnuts at an AA meeting.
So no trouble?
I don't get it. Not an alcoholic.
You know that's not true. He used to curse me as soon as I got on IRC.
(Until I pulled his card.)
[removed]
Just showing him what it feels like to be singled out and did he not offer to be the guy every hates if it created activity? I have been pretty active so I will give him that credit.
\o/
Currahee!
I was in EZC and I owe DeepChill and Gnilraps more than I could ever repay. I deeply miss the Screamin' Eagle forum. So I am going to do this one last time.
Currahee!
Interesting. The only way to stop this is to have an active press/citizenry, and honest people in Congress.
For Dio's sake you have got some serious screws loose Franklin. Your hard on for Pfeiffer is pretty much on par with Ajay Bruno level stalking. You don't publish anything in which you don't mention Pfeiffer's name. He's a guy who plays a shitty gypsy browser game just like the rest of us. You put the guy up on a pedestal and your obsession with him looks like some cross between love/hate/and worship. You think about the guy when you aren't playing the game don't you? You'd have to with as much of your time that you devote to him. Stay crazy Franklin, never change man, never change.