WHPR [Day 1,692] - Congratulations President Evry
![USA](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/USA.png)
James S. Brady Press Room
![](http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/716/muad7a.jpg)
1. Cabinet List
2. Alliance Answer
3. See new places! Be an Ambassador
![](http://i50.tinypic.com/kdlsn8.jpg)
Greetings, America.
I do hope that everyone’s recovered from the political battle that was one of the most controversial and exciting elections in recent times, the fight between Evry and Glove. While not the closest election in history (Blank Keating vs Technician), the media war between the two candidates served to be the most interesting part of it.
On winning the election, President Evry had the following statement:
![](http://i47.tinypic.com/2yjzjpx.jpg)
Congratulations to President Evry on her victory, and without further ado, here’s your elitist kabal, otherwise known as the Cabinet, for the month.
![](http://i681.photobucket.com/albums/vv177/Civilizor/wallpaper-2052212.jpg)
Oversight
President - Evry
Chief of Staff - John Killah
Deputy Chief of Staff - Ghost Killah
Defense
Vice President of Fighting - Ralph Ericson
Secretary of Defense - Cerb
Director(s) of the National Security Council - ErrOrka and potato134
Deputy Secretary of Defense - Dravik Rixx and Avruch
Director of OMS - Kemal Ergenekon
Director of Arm America - Soil3d
Foreign Affairs
Vice President of Communications - Alexander_Auctoritas
Secretary of State -Tenshibo
Deputy Secretary of State - Fhaemita Malodorous
Director of Alliance Affairs - Fhaemita Malodorous
Special Envoy of the President - Greene12
Director of Ambassadorial Affairs - Angelini
Domestic
Vice President of Domestics - Molly Emma
Secretary of Interior - Rainy Sunday
Secretary of Education - Dennis McVicker
Deputy Secretary of Education - emdoublegee
Civilian Military Unit Commander - DevinKestin
Meals on Wheels Director - Kodos
Boobs4Newbs Director - Molly Emma
Captain of the Smile Squad - Eric Vanderberg
DoI Staff Writer - Malarky83
Technology
Secretary of Technology: DarkMantle
Media
Secretary of Media - Civil Anarchy
Staff Writer - e5anderm
eNPR Director - youngHood
Advisors
Grand Visor - Cromstar
Congressional Liason - Artela
DoD Advisor - GoalieBCSC and Avruch
NSC Advisor - Vanek26
Congressional Advisor - Haliman
Feel free to check our President Evry’s Inaugural Address here
![](http://i50.tinypic.com/kdlsn8.jpg)
![](http://i681.photobucket.com/albums/vv177/Civilizor/wallpaper-1925490.jpg)
So, there’s been a lot of controversy over the new alliance issue, primarily due to the fact that it was released before any of the real details could have even been settled, and that fact caused a lot of people to jump to conclusions about it, some of them with less than honorable intentions regarding the new charter, but I digress. A lot of people truly underestimate how little had developed with the charter when it was made public. The core nations of CTRL hadn’t even signed on to the Charter, and yet people still hurled around accusations that we had betrayed our allies for Poland and Spain. These accusations are not only unfounded, but many of them are maliciously attempting to mislead people into thinking that we’re performing actions that we’re actually not. So, to dispel some of these things, I’ll take some of the questions that I’ve seen most frequently, and deal with them as best I can. Other questions in the comments section will be taken, and I’ll answer them to the best of my knowledge, and the amount of information that can be made public.
Reference to the old PANAM charter - I’m going to be referred to this as precedent quite a bit
Statement made by Secretary of State Tenshibo about CTRL
Q1: “Why did we have to start this new alliance?”
A) In the original Terra/PANAM charter, this is the stated purpose, “As a group of nations long driven by the whims and wills of Europe, we have decided to move away from the infighting and Eurocentrism that existed in both EDEN and PHOENIX. As a result, we have created a new alliance in which we will be able to explore our own goals outside those of Europe.” While the exact wording of the charter states eurocentrism, it became clear that the issues were being driven by Balkan conflicts, instead of an overall European centrism (hence the introduction of France, Germany, Portugal, ect into the alliance with little issue). As time went on, it became clear that PANAM (renamed Terra) was not able to fully operate on this capacity, which forced it into becoming Eden aligned after a major invasion of the primary Terran powers. This status quo continued for months, while Terra became weaker with the loss of certain members. In recent times, it was common knowledge that Terra had failed in it’s primary goal, and yet, the member states remained in the alliance because it was unfeasible to join Eden outright, or leave the alliance, due to powerful enemies. The creation of this new alliance changes the dynamic of the current TEDEN v ONE alliance structure so radically that, we believe, this idea of Balkan centrism can be combated and overcome, fulfilling the original intent of PANAM, and that of many of it’s member states.
Q2) Why weren’t all of our allies informed of this?
A) In the creation of the new alliance, we needed to actually have the core of nations settled before we invited new countries to the alliance itself. Similar to the way that PANAM was ratified as the original 4(5) countries involved, CTRL followed the same precedent. Negotiating terms with 10 different countries as a part of the creation of a new alliance is so diplomatically frustrating that, basically, most alliances choose to avoid it in the beginning stages. This doesn’t mean, at any rate, that our current allies won’t be accommodated for and invited into the alliance once it’s actually in existence. As I previously stated, when CTRL was leaked, even the charter hadn’t been fully agreed upon, so we were in no position to ask our allies to jump onto something that didn’t even exist at the time.
Q3) Are we allying Serbia/Hungary and becoming ONE aligned with CTRL?
A) This is one of the misconceptions that is most confusing to me. We are in no way allying with Serbia, Hungary, Macedonia, or ONE/CoT in general. It’s an entirely unfounded accusation, and is a perfect example of how a lot of the ‘information’ about CTRL consists of assumptions, and not actual statements of the US Government.
Q4) Okay, but isn’t an alliance with ONE inevitable? Aren’t you afraid Poland will somehow hijack the alliance and make it ONE aligned?
A) First of all, Poland is just as committed to the idea of an anti-Balkan centric alliance as any of the founders of the alliance are. Secondly, the leadership structure of the current alliance ensures that no one country would be able to force the other members into a conflict, or alignment, such as this. The Security Council based administration gives equal say to each founding country, and therefore, prevents such manipulation from any of the founding members.
Q5) What’s the deal with Canada?
A) So, even though Canada was originally on the list of countries that we were going to solicit for membership in CTRL, they refused to join the alliance on the basis that they wanted a founding seat for themselves. The Canadian President, Rylde, was able to obtain a copy of the makeshift CTRL charter from one of the four founding countries congressional processes, or some other leak, and decided to publish it immediately instead of consulting a representative from the country. Canada felt as though the new leadership structure put them in a subordinate position within the alliance, and demanded that they be placed as the ‘5th Security Council’ member, or else they would not join. Considering the fact the USA isn’t the only founding member of CTRL, we said no, they couldn’t have a founding member spot. Afterwards, we were told Canada would not be joining CTRL, in a less polite way than I previously phrased it. Canada’s invitation to the alliance has not been closed, however, and we’ve taken no preparations to become hostile towards them. Canada has, previously, been a steady ally of the United States, but if they refuse to follow us here, it is a choice we cannot force upon them.
Q6) How can we trust Spain and Poland? They’ve been our enemies for so long!
A) Enemies and allies has always been an interesting flow of events in eRepublik. Our very first enemy in this game was Canada. We fought many wars against Russia, invaded them and received invasions from them, and we were still able to put things aside. Brazil, at one point, was a major Phoenix power, but made the switch, wholeheartedly, to the opposite side. Allies and enemies change regularly in eRepublik, especially when some sort of mutual interest is met, such as the goal of CTRL. Spain and Poland weren’t always our enemies. In fact, for a good amount of time, Spain was one of our best allies.
Q7) When will any of this become official?
A) At the moment, not all of the founding countries have ratified the charter. Once that happens, the alliance will go public, and we will solicit old and new allies to join the alliance. Expect the next big announcement regarding the alliance to take place at around that event, just to keep the citizenry in the loop about what’s going on regarding the alliance.
Remember, new things cause a lot of people to freak out. If you have questions regarding the process, or the new alliance, feel free to show up in #whitehouse.public, or post in the comments. I’ll be sure to get to as many of them as I can.
![](http://i50.tinypic.com/kdlsn8.jpg)
![](http://i681.photobucket.com/albums/vv177/Civilizor/wallpaper-945993.png)
Disclaimer: you do not actually get paid
Are you a citizen looking for their place in this country?
Do you have any interest in trying to set up a political career?
Do you like titles?
Well, cadet, you sound like a perfect candidate for the United States Department of Ambassador Affairs! Become an Ambassador. Meet interesting people, insult less interesting people, have a cool title to add to your signature or whatever.
Ambassadors are what we use to publicly spy on other countries, so your stolen information will be invaluable to the Department of State....unless you’re the ambassador to North Korea. If so, good luck! You won’t be coming back.
If you have any interest in becoming an ambassador, feel free to send a message to Angelini, stating your interest in titles and ambassadorificating other countries.
Recommended Reading:
| The President's Newspaper | Speaker's Word | DoD Civilian Orders | Dept of Education | Dept of Interior |
| White House Press Room | Pony Express | eNPR Radio | Terra Times | Voice of EDEN |
![](http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/ad221/ArmyPublicAffairsOffice/Line_Break-Flag_pin.jpg)
Join a Military or Militia: Links Updated 02.03.12
😉
eRebuglik now breaks links to Google Docs. If your link is broken, please contact this Org with a TinyURL or similar shortcut.
| US Civilian MU | Air Force | Special Forces | Rogue Squadron | Ultramarines | SEAL Team 6 | OWLs |
| EZ Company | The Higher Calling | Bad Company | Sons of Liberty | Bear Cavalry | Pickle's Patriots | Hell Jumpers |
| eUS Training Corps | National Guard | Mobile Infantry | eUS Army | Airborne | Marine Corps | Avengers | The ICA | The Chosen Ones| Cannon Cockers |
![](http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/ad221/ArmyPublicAffairsOffice/WHPR_separator_650.png)
![](http://i681.photobucket.com/albums/vv177/Civilizor/1302977469935-1.jpg)
Civil Anarchy
Civilized Anarchism, at your service.
![](http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/ad221/ArmyPublicAffairsOffice/Line_Break-Flag_pin.jpg)
![](http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/ad221/ArmyPublicAffairsOffice/DoD_30px-b.jpg)
![](http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/ad221/ArmyPublicAffairsOffice/Pony__HalfBanner-30x375.png)
![](http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/ad221/ArmyPublicAffairsOffice/WHPR_HalfBanner-30x375.png)
![](http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/ad221/ArmyPublicAffairsOffice/eNPR_banner_30x675.jpg)
2164
Comments
[removed]
[removed]
****ing Bot
Boated
Voted.
\o
Evry is black too?
Voted!
CANAM II: NAVE'S REVENGE
Voted!
V
will eRomania get an invitation to this new aliance? dont think so couse Brazil would not accept that...so will the new aliance have a mpp with eRomania?
@Molumze: Considering Romania's strong ties to Eden, they will likely not be a country we would invite to the alliance. As for an MPP with them, it's very possible that we will continue our MPPs with them, provided they don't choose to fight any CTRL members.
@Civil Anarchy
im not the govermant of eRomania, but i think its logical that if spain or poland dont atack, Romania will not...but hey...you never know what somebody has in mind for the future....
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvrcr4fIBT1qibz0jo1_1280.jpg
Sorry, but America will never fight for Poland or Spain. The founding four should have been five to include the United States, Russia, China, Brazil and France with Ireland, Germany and Canada the first invitees, with Spain under Portuguese occupation. You speak of getting out of a Eurocentric mindset, yet this Alliance is aimed at quelling the Balkans; that's as Europe as it gets.
@Dru: Many people would've said the same thing about Russia not too long ago. And no, this is not an alliance dedicated to 'quelling' the balkans, it's an alliance dedicated to the idea that countries outside of the Balkans do not have to appeal to those countries in order to be important.
This is a bipolar world, either Spoland will end up pro-TEDEN or Brazil & the USA will end up pro-ONE. The only alternative is Ctrl v non-Ctrl, but I doubt that is viable for either side.
Evry is Michelle Obama? 😮
Evry is Michelle Obama? 😮
^Listen to Danie Fox, this man speaks the truth
seriously? we all know that ur gonna sign mpp with serbia & hungry first week in that ''new alliance''
So how many regions will our smaller allies that we have long fought for be forced to give up to appease Poland's resource needs if they want a shot at the table scraps when they "join" this alliance?
Screw this place I'm outta here. You even specifically stated that we are now "anti-blakan" even though through thick and thin Croatia has been one of our best allies. Of course the others as well: Albania, BiH, Greece, Romania, Turkey. This sheer stupidity reflected on the past administrations is overwhelming, and because of this we've no sunk to the low that loland has, hey maybe even lower. Keep up the great work eUSA, nice to know ya.
Poland has done us almost as much harm while our ally as it has while our enemy. At least while Poland is our enemy we can respond in kind.
Forcing an alliance down the throats of the eUS citizenry is not a wise way to do things.
I have to agree with John Jay. The entire way this fiasco was carried out is unsettling and I will NOT fight for Poland or Spain. I will fight FOR our traditional allies and against the alliance if necessary, as will many others.
There is Balkan-centrism simply because 70% of the world power is concentrated on the Balkans. Good luck escaping from that. I know very well you wont drop your Balkan MPP's for the exact same reasons.
@SVV lol, Spain and Poland are our "traditional allies".
What’s the deal with Russia?
@Publius, that was a really long time ago. And don't forget that Greece and Croatia were also in ATLANTIS.
@DH The point is the hypocrisy. For a while after we went to PANAM/Terra a lot of people (but particularly the JCS) were all like I could never fight against Spain because they are like bros. Now people are like I could never fight with Spain because they are not bros. Peoples' attitudes will change with time and new players will come that have never know the current status quo.
The executive sets policy, so either go with it, vote in a new government, or leave the country.
I choose Dio.
can i be ambassador? preferably in brazil, hungary, prague, thailand or some other place where yoghurt is in high demand.
Spain and Poland have been allies for a very long time,that's why I'd agree with the project of this new alliance.I hope this last will include also countries,that have been loyal towards U.S.
usa is becoming new loland..
As long as Spain and Poland keep their MPPs with Serbia and Hungary the Americans will end up fighting against Croatia, Greece, Romania, etc.
The reason is simple: as long as those MPPs exist, Poland and Spain will support Serbia and Hungary, so Spain and Poland will need to be drained every time Serbia and Hungary are under attack.
As a result the USA will be dragged again in the "Balkan wars", this time against long term allies like Croatia, Greece and Romania.
tl;dr-Version: "We are no traitors, we just changed sides"
Civil Anarchy
'@Dru: Many people would've said the same thing about Russia not too long ago. And no, this is not an alliance dedicated to 'quelling' the balkans, it's an alliance dedicated to the idea that countries outside of the Balkans do not have to appeal to those countries in order to be important.'
I agree, but as far as I know Russia has never back stabbed us like Poland and Spain. For me the most import fact is that America needs someone -Russia/China- to protect our west coast....
This alliance is obviously in the best interest of this country. If your not a complete noob you would notice that changes like this have happened numerous times over the last couple years. So stop complaining and show some support for your leaders and your country.
This is bull&^$$.
Dumb & Dumber mode just to believe ONE word.
I wholly agree with Cil venom.What's the matter?It's quite normal to change alliance.Years ago USA were a member of EDEN
@Scoundrel You're exactly right, alliances do change and we were members of EDEN. However, when we left and, eventually, joined a new alliance we didn't allow the other founding members to maintain their MPP's with ONE. We also didn't force our weaker Allies to take concessions to join the alliance.
@Maxx et al: Poland and Spain are not dead set on keeping those MPPs, especially considering the fact that the polish president announced that they would, very possibly, sour relations with ONE once this alliance deal went down.
I think this new alliance is a great idea and dont see why everyone's getting mad about it.
@CA the fact that it is allowable and on the table for the alliance should have been a deal breaker, plain and simple.
There also hasn't been any comments on where Poland is getting it's resources from if Germany and France are to be Allies. It's almost as though our NAP with Poland which allowed Poland to pick up additional territory in Europe was done to give the alliance a bargaining chip against F/G to force them into the fold under less than ideal terms for them.
Q5 amendment, or what really happened, read here:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-potus-canada-betrays-america-2075388/1/20
Canadian president Rydle answer to the accusations that Canada betrayed USA:
"I wasn't contacted or informed about this alliance in the works vs TERRA's enemies as France and Germany barely stands on the map.
Were they??
I stand next to my allies to the death.
I'm a traitor for bringing a secret alliance to the light for all to see?"
tfw no gf
The first condition of creation of new alliance shall be: leave France and Germany alone. We shall offer same with Mexico. Aligning with country which occupies allies is wrong. I am not sure if I have seen conditions of NAP anywhere.
NO PEACE WITH POLAND AND SPAIN
NO PEACE WITH POLAND AND SPAIN
Oh man, we're worse than the damned Brits. Blah, blah, justify stabbing your friends in the back...blah, blah, rinse and repeat.