Top 5 reasons I'm voting Woxan and why you should too
![USA](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/USA.png)
Harrison Richardson
So, it seems the US forums are down. We (the Admin team) hope they're going to be up quickly, but we're never sure of how quickly. Rest assured, we're (and when I say we, I mean PigInZen) doing all we can to get them up as quickly as possible. However, this gives me some time to write again, so I'm going to talk about the election. I've been a pretty outspoken but cordial critic of the Jewitt administration, I'd like to think, and it should come as no great surprise to anyone that I support Woxan for his bid as President of the United States. There are plenty more than 5 reasons why I like Woxan, but I'm going to narrow it down to that many for you here:
Woxan's platform
5. Woxan's promise for a Federal Auditor, appointed by Congress
This was something that I worked hard on during my term as President, but I never thought to give Congress the chance to appoint an individual. Having someone appointed by Congress given oversight and broad access to internal spending documents will greatly enhance the transparency of our Executive Branch. Also, the Federal Auditor would serve as a person who could provide suggestions to streamline processes to make sure budgeted funds get to the right people on time so it can help them. The Federal Auditor's role is to make sure funds are being spent in the right place and are being done in the most cost-efficient manner.
4. Promise to use diplomacy before war
One of my biggest complaints of the Jewitt Administration has been the continued declarations of war. By last count, we've had 3, which totals nearly 5000 gold just in declaration costs. That doesn't include the monies used by tanking and arming military forces. The US undoubtedly spent a pretty penny attempting to take Kyushu, only to be granted free passage merely days later. Perhaps only to me this seems like a glaring diplomatic error. Did so much change in President Dokomo's eyes in those two days that he flip-flopped on a position, or did the US State Department not adequately relay our position and our diplomatic offerings to the President to convince him to allow us free passage? I trust Woxan will hold up this campaign pledge in his (potential) term.
3. Promise to place allies over all else
This is a tactical approach I have always advocated. Back when Sweden and Germany we were at war, we were pushed to support Germany, a more or less neutral nation, versus an invading Sweden, a staunch ally. We couldn't back Sweden's invasion, but our neutrality proved that we will stand by those who stood by us for the entirety of the game preceding that event. As with Spain and Romania being invaded, we have to show that the might of the US Armed Forces is not only used for our own gain but for the continued support of our allies. Spain helped the US out and arguably won Lioaning for us, it's only fair that we return the favor.
2. Promise to create a tactical rainy-day fund for future engagements
When I was President and we were being invaded, our coffers were relatively small. We had a couple thousand gold, but that was dozens of thousands less than what PEACE had at their disposal and spent during the North American invasion. Had we initially had more funds to use, we would have been in a much better position and been able to spend funds at the beginning of the war, stopping it before it ever started. Because of our limited financial capability, we had to resort to a war of attrition and willingly giving up regions because of a lack of funding to tank them or arm soldiers at times. Never again should this happen, and the proposition of a massive fall-back fund for such occasions is a great idea and one we should have done a long time ago. Emerick has always been a proponent on this and it's one thing he's definitely right about. Also, this will be helpful if we see massive changes in the new economic module and we need to use federal funds to adjust to it.
1B. Promise to keep and secure a high iron region and to use it to increase our military power
This goes without saying, but it's assumed that if we take PHOENIX's high iron and keep one of the extra regions for ourselves, the power of the game will shift massively towards EDEN. We will not only use this high iron region to create massive gold reserves, which serve as a deterrent to foreign invasion, but we will also be able to use the money to continue to free oppressed nations, as we've done with Greece, India, and Asia. This is the best course for our nation and I hope we continue on it.
1A. Ligtreb is his Vice President
Because he really is that awesome. Seriously.
There you have it. Those are 5 of the many reasons I'm voting Woxan in this election. We're lucky that we have two incredibly competent candidates for office this month, so let's count our holiday blessings. Gone are the days when Ajay Bruno can actually get on the ballot. O7 America, over and out.
HR
Comments
unomaxxx
Second
2nd
Damn, FRANCOMAXXXX
I win 🙂
From Estonia with love 🙂
Lol
Doesn't it get annoying when an enemy takes what you thought you had?
Woxan's platform is good, not going to lie. But Jewitt's platform is what he's done so far this term, and no offense, but no other president's accomplishments, save for maybe emerick/gaius can really compete with that.
Also, the high iron pledge in the platform is kind of pointless now, after Jewitt already proposed a q5 hospital in Karnataka.
I'll have to be sticking with Jewitt for my vote this election. :/ (both are very good candidates though)
i passed HR in experience points, his argument is invalid.
@ Boomer - I'm of the mind Jewitt has pretty much reaped the benefits of other's labors, if we're being honest. This plan wasn't a product of Jewitt's Administration, it's a product of the Frost Administration and others before it.
HR supports Woxan? What a surprise. lol
That's not to say Jewitt has had a bad term, btw. He hasn't. I just don't think he is deserving of all the credit he gets from the liberation.
Francomaxxx
Woxanmaxxx
ST6maxxx
oh, look, franco likes woxan. I'll be voting jewitt
I'm voting Woxan this election, he's a more calculating leader instead of the brute force, for the lulz one we have now. Plus it will decrease the number of articles Arjay pumps out each day 😉
Woxan can promise the moon and diplomacy but I doubt he can deliver either.
Promise to never run around and hurt us?
Nobody cares HR.
This game is about wars NOT DIPLOMACY!! GIMME MOAR WARS!111!One!1!!eleven!1!!
Agreed. Jewitt did it but it would've been better if he had spent a little less gold 😛
Anyways.. nice article.
After a millisecond's consideration of Woxan, I'm voting Jewitt again.
derpjewittsucksderp
Jewitt promised us some Lobster-backs, yet we are not in London.... That's all I'm saying... 😛
All true
Awesome article HR, your points and/or the tradition pic have swayed me!
There have been some stunning displays of rational discussion in this thread. I would like to cite HeinekenCoC as a stunning example of the thought that all of us could should be putting into our comments.
Now is your moment, EDEN needs you! http://www.erepublik.com/es/article/now-is-your-moment-eden-needs-you--1117338/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/es/article/now-[..]/1/20
I'm not surprised by HRs decision 😛
5. More government red tape and bureaucracy. Most likely an appointment that will be given to a good-ol-boy-backslapping-buddy, or a group of them.
4. Is just not realistic. Diplomacy is only saying "please?" before taking something, in eRepublik. Diplomacy is 100% role playing, and has no use in terms of defensive game mechanics - unless you want to ally with every other nation.
3. Allies are extremely important, but it's foolish to get in between two warring allies.
2. Interpreted to mean an even higher tax rate to maintain current operations PLUS saving. Saving should happen during peacetime.
1B. Keeping a high iron region is just absolutely, completely idiotic. All that will do is be a gigantic red target for anybody looking to "take down" the US. Plus, it will hurt the economies of our iron-supplying allies. This also contradicts promises #4 & #3.
1A. Can't argue with that.
Nobody cares, Krems.
Well, I've been thinking about trying Woxan out for president for awhile, depending on if I think he can either continue this war, or make its legacy successful will be the test if I vote for him this term or not.
Without endorsing anyone I have a few comments:
1. There were many diplomatic efforts made with Japan for literally months prior to the Kyushu attack. From Emerick's term forward. I personally had a number of discussions with Dokomo for several weeks leading up to the declaration. Dokomo's ultimatum was his doing, not ours, and was intended to show that Japan was no one's instrument, especially not ours. Your opinions are just that, opinions.
As for the other declarations of war, did you expect Iran and North Korea (Russia) to willingly depart? I mean the POINT of the whole Asian campaign was to take regions from the enemy. That's hard to do without an active war against them.
Many of the military decisions were designed to take advantage of the Russian President situation where time is of the essence.
As for your contention that we are not supporting our allies, I assure you that decisions are being made at an alliance level for the benefit of all members. It is to the advantage of all of EDEN that Iran and Indonesia no longer have high iron and the US does. The leaders of these nations understand this and agree, regardless of what you read in the media.
Rainy day funds are great, but the point of them is to have funds for strategically important battles like say TAKING HIGH IRON FROM IRAN AND INDONESIA. Yes, we've been spending gold and it's been worth every cent.
@ Harlot -
I'm not contending we're not supporting allies right now. I'm just stating why I'm supporting Woxan, which is that is a part of a platform that is literally a deal breaker for me.
Rainy day funds are great for, say, when you're being invaded. I agree, it's good to spend funds and take high iron from enemies, but it's also nice to have funds to back up those investments when you're attacked the next day.
inre: Dokomo - I'm sorry, we may just have to agree to disagree, but I simply don't see how we can attack and spend thousands of gold on a region when the President willingly let us through a few days later.
@ Dell -
If you think Congress won't appoint someone impartial, go talk to Congress. I trust their judgment.
If you think Diplomacy doesn't exist in eRepublik, I don't know what to tell you. I think if we would have tried a bit harder, Dokomo would have let us through and we'd be a couple thousand gold richer right now.
I agree, it's not a good idea to get in between two warring allies, but when they both ask you for help, you have to pick a side. Who are you going to take?
We can find room in our budget (especially with increased revenue, which we are seeing!) for a rainy day fund + current operations.
I fail to see how 1b contradicts any points.
Harlot 1 Franco 0
Congress is one gigantic group-thinking rubberstamp. They will appoint one of their own. Their populist mentality will not allow them to name somebody who would be critical of them, or -God forbid- actually be objective. Methinks thou protest too much; perhaps you have a personal stake in this? Maybe you've been whispering in ears to land the job?
My stance on diplomacy is that standing on a railroad track asking "Please stop?" isn't going to stop the train from running you down. Your presidency, where the US lost 50 of it's 51 territories, is a perfect example of my point.
A competent diplomat/politician does not get involved at all with warring friendlies. This should be a stipulation of (or amendment to) any alliance treaty. No choice is a choice.
"Finding room in a budget" is politicalspeak for raising taxes. Plain and simple. Only a fool would believe otherwise.
I'll just assume that your "failure to see any contradictions" is just your way of compensating for poor reading comprehension skills.
I wouldn't want the Federal Auditor job.
We wouldn't be asking "Please stop", we'd be asking "Please let us through so we can avoid spending 8000 gold on a battle we're going to lose".
When you're forced to choose, you have to pick a side (or pick neutrality). I support the one where we side by our allies.
Stop twisting my words. Right now, we're bringing in revenue above budgeted amounts. Instead of going elsewhere, I'd like to see it go to a rainy day fund, at least some of it. Call it a surplus.
You can assume whatever you want, that doesn't make it any more right.
You might also consider that the plans for Asia were already well in motion when Jewitt took office. The Declaration of War was on his first day. You can hardly fault him for what you perceive to be the diplomatic failures of the previous administration.
You are free to disagree with me all you like but it doesn't change that fact that it was Dokomo's decision, not Jewitt's. Japan was not going to let us through despite extensive negotiations. What changed after Kyushu was a change in Japan, not in our approach. I suggest you read Dokomo's articles, you'll find nothing in them about failures of US diplomacy. It was an internal decision for Japan.
I agree, Harlot, it was an act of prior administrations. I'm just curious why Jewitt felt the need to jump in so quickly without giving Dokomo (who was, iirc, a newly elected Japanese President, I may be wrong on that) time to possibly think over his diplomatic options. You saying he declared in his first day underscores the diplomatic failure in that he didn't give time for his Secretary of State to talk to Dokomo and seemingly jumped in guns blazing.
I agree, it's Dokomo's decision, but why couldn't we work harder to get them to agree? I'm an outsider so I don't know how intense the discussions were, but if they flipped mere days after, they had to have been considering the issue during the negotiations, we just didn't do enough to convince them of acting.
Funny how the author, chief actor, and promoter of this little piece of literature:
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dgc6tq9n_6fb755zgg" target="_blank">http://docs.google.com/View?id=dgc6tq9n_[..]5zgg
is all bent out of shape over "only" 8,000 gold that was LEGITIMATELY used. By legitimate, I mean not stolen. You hypocrite!
Now, don't get me wrong, I like Woxan, I think he's competent, and I have some respect for the guy. But...your endorsement of him is poisonous.
"I may be wrong" - You are.
"I am an outsider" - You are.
Because YOU weren't a party to the negotiations doesn't mean they didn't occur. As I said already, the operations for Kyushu were already under way. As a former President and officer in the Airborne, you know that major military operations just don't magically appear. It takes time and effort. We had exhausted diplomatic approaches and the time had come to act.
I will refrain at this time from considering your characterization of "jumping in guns blazing" and your continued delusion that no diplomacy occurred as being a mild form of calling me a liar.
As for your rainy day funds for an invasion, you have misplaced yourself. Congress sets the budget, not the President. In case you aren't paying attention, we are in the middle of a major offensive, the biggest the US has ever been involved in. That costs money. If you don't support the Asian campaign then just say so, but I think you'll have to change a few of your other platform planks.
Actually, I just remembered that Woxan was Frost's VP. So any failures of diplomacy could be laid at his feet moreso than Jewitt's. Just a thought.
ITT: Harlot's mad.
I never said negotiations didn't occur. I am saying that I believe we didn't try hard enough to get them done. I believe Frost was probably on the right track for Japan to let us through, but Jewitt jumped in on the first day of office (your words) and declared war on Japan. Surely he didn't have enough time to digest the situation, much less attempt diplomatic accords with Japan?
I fail to see how I'm calling you a liar, because I'm not.
We currently have a massive budget surplus because of increased revenues. All I (and others) want is to see some of that tucked away so that we can access it if we really need it. Spending now is all good and well and I hope some of the surplus goes to the military, but to never save money is a bad tactic and it was shown during the NA invasion that it can be deadly.
Josh Frost/Woxan may have been able to make diplomatic relations with Japan or they may not have, we'll never know. What we do know is Jewitt wasn't able to.
Of course all failures are naturally all my fault.
I like Woxan and have been voting for him every election. I hope he finally pulls it off this time 😃
So you ignored Frost's article where he said he would have attacked Kyushu too? Since he was involved in all the planning for it. Seems logical that Woxan, as his VP was as well.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/you-have-questions-i-have-answers-1111394/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/you-[..]1/20
"Yes without question I would have attacked Kyushu. The die was cast by that point and there was no turning back. We had an incredible opportunity in eRepublik history to strike into Asia and make a legitimate attempt at taking Heilongjiang (Hello Kitty) from Hungary and effectively ending the war. No president worth his salt would pass on that opportunity."
I don't get mad about this stuff. I'm just keeping you honest. You can have legitimate complaints, but not bullshit ones
Harlot v. Franco
Call your local ticketmaster or order on PPV!
Actually Harlot, Woxan was not involved in the planning. Gaius and I tried to limit as many people in the know as possible in terms of planning the actual operation.