Join the new world

BEPClashmaxxxx!!!!!

I would just like to say say a big thanx to the dude who did the graphics.
🙂

http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-atilaa-1-1134634/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-ati[..]1/20
please vote this to avoid loseing democrasy

Sexy.....Manifesto will be put up ASAP

*BEP becomes PCP*

Clash Vs Devioux leadershipracemax!

Hahaha maybe the underdog has a chance at an upset 🙂

Everybody loves an underdog!

DD, how are we the pcp?

ignore DD

Woo go the salmon!

Jay, you're using the party to endorse a candidate. Only PCP does that. It's wrong imo.

Devioux - Why should i be ignored? I'm not trolling, imo im making a valid point - Or do you intend to "ignore" all valid points you don't like, should you become PP?

Admittedly, it's now including 3 candidates instead of just Clash, but it's still wrong.

every forum active candidate has had the full support of the party. if anyone else had been forum active, they would have had the same support! surely it is a possitive step letting the members that aren't so active, know how to find the manifesto of the most active candidates. as somebody who takes the time to help as many n00bs as possible, i know a lot of people don't know how to get to read these manifestoes. also, the only reason there was only clash being advertised at first, is because he was the only person forum active that was running. the others were added as soon as they made it clear to me they were running. for somebody who steals companies, i can't understand how you can judge anybody else. the real question everybody wants to know the answer to, is why you keep on posting here, when it has nothing to do with you. are you feeling a bit of regret. i'm just glad you showed everyone how much of an idiot you are.

This is spruce by the way, not Jay! And FYI, nobody is intersted in your opinion

Ouch. Well said Spruce!

Yes, I'm smarting.

I wasn't judging anybody, I was merely stating my opinion, much the same as all the other comment(ers) did, on this public article. Should you not wish for the public to see this article, may I suggest you don't release it in this fashion. Note the word "public" in "publicly".
Had you any idea of BEP affairs, you'd also know that I didn't steal any companies.

I'm just glad you enjoyed *proving me and idiot*, because given the amount of respect I carried with BEP, that must show how much MORE of an idiot you lot are, right?

FYI, before making such a comment, maybe check with some BEPers, who still seem deeply interested in my opinion.

LOL, thats like me going to eAmerica, then fighting eUK, and then expecting people in eUK to respect.

Notice how neither of us confused the meaning of respect with "Like"

So could you exlpain to the the epublik, how the companies left the BEP in the first place? That would really shut me up. Of course you didn't give us any warning, to move them to a different org, I'm sure there was a good reason.

Huh? I didn't ask anyone to respect me.

No, true, but then neither of us are pretending i was well liked. So i don't see how it's relevant.

Yes, gladly. In the full knowledge of your PP at the time, one Daniel Thorrold, i changed the organisations password and email. I then sold the companies the eRoyal Navy (for a profit, might i mention), and promptly returned the money to it's original owner, who can do as he wishes with it. You could start up the whole project again, with more money than you had before.
"Stealing" is a "crime". A "Crime", in order for it to be deemed as such requires a "victim", be it a collective victim or an individual. I don't see how there was a victim, seeing as though, as i previously explained, you were in fact, the beneficiary. A more relevant term relating to my actions would actually be "Charity".

K.
Thx.

Well... BEP just got owned

Does BEP have any further holes to dig?

I never said you asked for respect. Did you not just change the password and email, then tell Daniel!
Why sell them to the navy?
The companies should never have left the BEP!
Theft is taking without concent! Wheather Daniel knew about it is irrelevent, nobody told you you could take the companies. You really shouldn't proclaim to know about law, when you are just copying something you heard off the bill!
The only victim here is Betafoxtrot, for getting dragged into this and taking your side, when he obviously doesn't know what he's on about!
Any so called proffit, would only cover lost earnings, and the inconveniance of having the companies taken from us without permission.

I'm no victim, I'm just not stupid >_>

So your not stupid enough to comment on something you know nothing about? Your blind faith that your new RFA chum has done nothing wrong, is laughable. Maybe DD can enlighten us all with his book of made up law,lol.

Wait... Where did I say that?

Your arguments are getting rather lame, what with bill jokes etc

I don't believe Beta has taken a side, nor did he say he didn't think I'd done anything wrong, he merely oberved that you were getting owned. "Lost Profits"? That place never made a penny, and regardless, the companies were only gone for a few days, so the extra money would cover far more than that.

May I suggest you stop replying, before the public gets to see any more of BEP, because seeing BEP's true self isn't a pleasent experience for anyone, and I certainly can't see it enticing to prospective members.

You left the BEP and you still post here, why?
Beta saying we are owned by you is taking sides!
You still haven't answered why you took the companies without permission.

May i sugest you stop posting here before you run out of bull shit.

May I suggest you stop repeating the questions I've answered, evidently you ran out of bullshit a while ago, and have taken up insanity. For your benefit however, as I like to help out noobs when I can, I'll repeat myself. This is a public newspaper, so I am entitled to comment, if you wxnt it BEP only, do it via PM. Regardless, you were clearly making a dig at me, and I imagine most anyone would've defended themselves.

No, it isn't. Beta is making a valid observation from a neutral standpoint. He'll, BEP have admitted they failed at something enough times, using your logic, BEP is at war with itself. Is this true, or are you simply failing?

I have explained to Daniel, and 2 or 3 other members who recognise what I did for BEP, and have explained why I took the companies. Ask them in your pathetic excuse for a forum if you must. Regardless, I have no intention of telling you now.


/me yawns

Anything else?

which still meens that you have not answered here, why you took the companies!
yes i repeat myself when you keep on coming out with the same shit.
You have explained why you did it to two or three people, but fail to say why here. whats the big secret? Funny how the only person to make an observation is in the same party as you! are you trying to say that theft is ok as long as you have an excuse?
Why are you making rules of law up? crap about victims and all that. maybe if you said something that was true, i wouldn't make fun of the fact that you are probably quoting from the bill. as soon as you let us all know why you took the companies without permission, i will stop asking the question. is that so hard to understand. why are you getting so defensive over a simple question, which you refuse to answer. if i robbed your e-house
and then told you why the next day, would you forgive me?

No big secret. I had a plan, but decided not to go ahead with it. I was going to hold you to ransom over something, if you must know. But I chose not to. Simple, no?

It's not crap, and I wasn't quoting from the bill

Bill...

You'll also notice I never asked for forgiveness.

Have you quite finished embarrassing yourself?

Yes. Though i do like a heated exchange of words!
For me, the best bit about politics.
I wish you a good day, my good sir!