Congressional Results: A Breakdown
![USA](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/USA.png)
Ansen
Here are the final congressional results broken down by party:
1) United States Workers Party: 14
2) Conservative Party: 9
3) United Independents Party: 8
4) Libertarian Party: 6
5) America's Advancement Party: 5
6) Nationalist Party: 4
7) Federalist Party: 3
😎
Socialist Freedom Party: 1
* The Rhode Island seat is vacant. The winner there, Mexidus (CvP), was permabanned. (Dillon Smith (UIP) of Hawaii was also permabanned, but the seat there was awarded to Chimichonga Barbosa.)
The United States Workers Party finished with a solid election, winning big in states like Florida, New York, and California. However, many of their votes went towards piling on for their "big state" candidates. If the votes had been spread around more evenly, they might have added even more states to their win column.
The Conservative Party had a solid election as well. They had 12 winners under the CvP banner, but Kyle321n is a Nationalist, and, as mentioned previously, Mexidus of Rhode Island was permabanned, presumably for multi-accounting. That leaves them with ten, still pretty strong for the third largest party in the nation.
The big winners of the March elections may have been the United Independents Party (full disclosure: I am a member of the UIP). The UIP finished third in the final tally, despite only being the fifth largest party with slightly over 300 members. They may have been helped by the fact that all of their election winners were actually from their party - none were "sixth party" candidates. Additionally, there weren't really any landslides in the UIP victories (Oregon maybe being the only exception). This allowed the party to spread their votes around quite effectively.
The big loser in this election is probably the Libertarian Party. Despite having over twice the membership of the UIP, the Libs were only able to garner six spots in congress. The Libs didn't see their numbers shrink due to sixth party candidates either - six wins was the grand total under the Libertarian banner. There were some small victories, however, as they saw impressive victories in Michigan (Chisholm came back after being down most of the day) and in Alaska, a UIP stronghold (ghvandyk beating Justinious McWalburgson III by a comfortable margin).
America's Advancement Party made a push for the "biggest loser" title as well, finishing with just five congressmen. The small number stems from the amount of sixth party candidates running with the party. All three Federalists, two Nationalists, and the Socialist Freedom candidate all ran with the AAP.
Of the smaller parties, the Nationalist Party finished with four members, running under the CvP and the AAP. This was about status quo for the nation's sixth party. The Federalist Party was able to grab three seats this election, with Tiacha, Bill Brasky, and Gilroy (all ran with the AAP) winning seats, ending up one seat behind the Nationalists. The final candidate, Robert Bayer, of the upstart Socialist Freedom Party, won his election in North Dakota by a comfortable margin.
Thanks for voting and subscribing!
Ansen
Vice-President, UIP
Congressman, KS
Comments
"The big losers in this election"
I'm not a loser 🙁 that hurts Ansen
Gilroy is a Federalist too. There are three Feds who won.
I knew I would mess something up! My bad - Gilroy hasn't switched back yet. The article is updated, thanks Tiacha.
I'm voting this...like 9 times.
"The United States Workers Party finished with a solid election, winning big in states like Florida, New York, and California."
The New York election was a shoe-in. The opposition was fresh to eUSA and therefore didn't stand a chance against Citizen Dru. Not to vote for Citizen Dru may have been a regrettable decision, as it may have allowed a 0 experienced eCitizen have a go for a month.
New York, although a large state, is not a state worth boasting its win.
I agree Thomas. My point was that they had a lot of "wasted" votes in those big states that could have made a big difference if they were re-routed to smaller ones.
Well we've controlled New York for quite some time. I think we've held that seat for 4 months now. Same goes with California.
The Florida win was huge, but we've never won Florida before. Do you chalk that up to party-line voting or to the fact that the best candidate possible (Ananias) was running for that seat?
Anyway, I don't regret our votes because the assumption is we SHOULD be moving people around to win other seats. Quite frankly I think election bombing is a despicable tactic and I shy away from using it.
Great job, Ansen! 🙂
I never chalked anything up to party line voting. I think Ananias was the best possible candidate, and I'm glad he won.
I guess I differ w/ you on the definition of election bombing. I see that as a group of people in one country that move into another to take it over for the purposes of absorbing it or somehow using it for their home country's gain.
Moving around within regions in a country to vote for a candidate you support is well within the (current) parameters of the game, and I see no problem with it.
FIGHT SOCIALISM!!
"I see that as a group of people in one country that move into another to take it over for the purposes of absorbing it or somehow using it for their home country's gain."
That seems well within the parameters of the game too, as far as I know, there is no rule against PTOs, and if there is, its obviously not enforced... I don't support it though. I don't support congressional election bombing by parties, either.
You could re-word the definition of domestic election bombing to say, "A group of people from one party moving into one state to take its congressional seat over for the purposes of gaining control of congress for their own party's gain."
Whether on a national scale, or an international scale, I see little difference.
When most people run congressional campaigns, they don't anticipate non-citizens moving in to vote for their opposition. Neither do the actual residents of that state.
I like this. voted.
If the USWP supported election bombing, we'd probably have a 2/3 majority in Congress right now. I'm glad we don't use our numbers that way tho-- there are some great candidates from other parties I'm happy to see were elected.
Hm. I do agree in large part with your analysis, but, while I am the SFP's congressman, I do plan on working closely with the AAP.
I make no apologies for my win in New York, Thomas Forbe. Every other party was free to compete there, and they chose not to. The USWP won this month 89 to 15, whereas last month with virtually the same vote total, the USWP only won the vote split as 40/25/23/11/7.
The USWP and UIP were indisputable winners. Every other party lost at least one seat.
Fail on the CVP (9 seats, actually) for not vetting a now banned multi.
My name is in this, therefore it deserves a vote 😉
Nice article, well written too, votado!
I'm actually AAP/NP, so I'm not sure what that does to your numbers? Maybe 0.5 for each?
I also think the comments by others about "the residents of a state" is hilarious. No region in the US actually has hard and fast residents. When there is war, there is no reason to be anywhere other than Florida. Although, now, apparently New Jersey is an exception. If my fellow Congressmen get their way, we may end up with a Q5 hospital in every state. I suppose then you could have people live where they really wanted to and be able to fight from a "home" of sorts.
The only other people attached to a particular state (other than for elections) are new players who maybe don't have the money or interest to move. That is fine. But to suggest that they'd be somehow offended that other people travelled within the US to vote for someone they support is a bit absurd.
After all, this is just a game, is it not?
Go socialists : )
Please VOTE.
You can play and have fun to😇
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/do-you-need-fun-round-2-764095/1/20
Tnx!
Socialist Freedom!
"Additionally, there weren't really any landslides in the UIP victories"
Uh.... did you LOOK at Montana? The UIP candidate there got more votes that the state TOTALS for the past 3 months!
@ Talia
Since I was looking at 51 different races, I didn't really have time to study each one's history. The race was won by four votes, which doesn't really qualify as a landslide to me.
@ Equality / Jordan
Exactly what Equality said. Jordan, let's take your definition for a moment: "A group of people from one party moving into one state to take its congressional seat over for the purposes of gaining control of congress for their own party's gain."
So is a USWP candidate getting sent to run in a state that he neither lived in nor has any real connection to election bombing as well? It fits the definition!
"When most people run congressional campaigns, they don't anticipate non-citizens moving in to vote for their opposition."
Give me a break. The candidates themselves are non-citizens.
As Equality said, the difference between national and international is that few experienced and active players in the game have a "home state" in any real sense. At the very least, we're much more passionate about our "home nation". For political purposes, states / regions are largely irrelevant.
Voted. Nice job Ansen!
Quick Analysis
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/why-the-uswp-failed-to-score-a-landslide-763381/1/20
Hey, I'll accept near-landslide designation. ;-P
Thanks Ansen. Just rub some salt in that wound. lol.