CHOOSE and SELECT and ELECT... and what after?
![Malaysia](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/Malaysia.png)
Amli Nujhan
I think we should correct our behavior and habits.
For every election we can see candidates pop out of nowhere; I hate to say that the focal motive can be no other than medal hunting to some of them.
I would like to see the parties play 90% in any election. Election shouldn't be a personal effort of each candidates. Because through elections parties can prove their strength, relevancy and objectives. Although nowadays not many people pay attention on statistics of the winning seats, number of membership but those are some other pride that has been lost for long.
From what I believe, it should have been the party that should carefully selected the running candidates. If there are only 9 seats to be contested, then let be 9 candidates running; 1 or 2 blockers are still acceptable but if there are too many got involved than we are wasting our valuable votes.
On top of all, the decision on who would represent the party for the CP election. A party SHOULD nominate a person for the CP election.
I actually really meant that such important person has to be well discussed among the party elders. The best if it's not driven by the sole ambition of the candidate, but rather take it a responsibility entrusted to him.
And, the role played by the parties shouldn't end there after the election.
The parties mechanism should always be the prime backbone of the elected person's carrier. The party should always try to elevate him to be seriously successful.
If anything go wrong with the elected candidates credibility, the party should hold responsibility as well.
Comments
hmm... i didnt see this coming.
Nice insight!!
We should make CP candidacy a party effort!! : D
How in conjunction with the eMLP's Constitution article.
eMLP is already on the track.
We have 3 systems running the country
1- Congress: from multiple parties
2- Cabinet: selected by the president; as the MANAGEMENT body
3- President: as the ADMINISTRATIVE pole; which I'm suggesting to be motivated and braced by the party mechanism.
Only then, we can polish up the form and functions of the parties.
Otherwise our parties will remain as plain dumb bodies; just to fulfill the game's requirement for the election purpose only.
I think with eMLP what we are trying to do as a party is to revive the political scene in eMalaysia. We have not only revolutionised the 'third party' but have also brought in a good amount of new talent.
And from what I've seen there is sadly a general lack of activity from the other parties especially when it comes to proposing laws in Congress.
Well written.
the real problem is we lack of player and activity. there is not much competition and most of ppl not interested in it.
in CP election we can see the vote reach 100+, MU have 50 member.
but i only see same ppl posting or comment, everyday not more than 10....
Yup... we are lack of player... AND ACTIVITY.
That is why we need to make parties to a working main instrument.
...TO PROMOTE ACTIVITY
Infinity, you are the current CP... what you are experiencing now is a HELL when everything is piling upon your head alone.
I tell you guys a sickening truth about how a successful party should be...
Even if you elect a stubborn 'donkey' as a country president, everything just may turn out fine due to structural collaborative effort to make that donkey successful. For what that donkey is carrying on his back are the burden and the objective of the people. The objectivity is laid by the party conceptual manifesto... be it reflecting capitalism, communism or whatever.
A little arguments and ass kicking caused by different ideas projected by other parties perhaps can make our life merrier.
We need a babyboom.
I'm new please add me as friend