Union of South Korea and Japan
Grampa Alfagrem
Those eCitizens who have not noticed the war between eSouth Korea and eJapan may soon notice the disappearance of eSouth Korea from the world.
This has come about by the decision of the eSK government, congress, companies and populace to ask for and to be granted ‘Union’ with eJapan.
In the lead-up to the last party elections a number of ATLANTIS origin eCitizens from ePoland and eUSA arrived in our small country and without an introduction or a word of notice - they took the leaderships of 4 of our 6 parties.
Prominent eSK citizens then began an exchange of notes about fighting the latest threat (whilst receiving assurances that these attempts were not officially backed by the governments of those countries). The discussion soon turned into a general “The trouble with eSK is….” topic and after some debate the idea of following the Belgian example of ‘Union’ was mooted and eJapan was the ideal choice.
It was only in eJapan that we could continue to experience the democratic traditions, personal freedoms, outlooks, economic models and fun we had enjoyed and looked to emulate in eSK as well as to experience the stability and social activity that makes the game playable.
The government ministers voted unanimously in favour.
The owners of the then active, eSK owned companies were canvassed and a 2/3rds majority was achieved.
The eSK congress members were then polled and a majority was achieved there.
As the congress vote was on-going, The government of eJapan was approached about the possibility and agreed on the pre-condition that a majority of eSK’s would have to agree and the request was to clearly come from South Korea.
-
We then faced the most important vote in eSK’s short history and PMâ��s were dispatched to all the South Koreans that;
1. Were of voting age. (level 6)
2. Were active. (employed in any eSK company and showing as have worked in the last 3 days)
3. Were on the eSK citizens list. (had been in Korea the day before the last presidential elections)
5 eSK citizens were however not polled due to ‘security concerns’ and they were assumed to have voted ‘No’ in the final tally.
-
48hours after the last PM was sent, the vote was returned and the final tally presented to the president;
‘Yes’ - 23votes
‘No’ - 15votes
‘Abstain’ (no particular preference) - 4votes.
The president then informed the populace at large and the eSK congress began the ’Union’ by declaring war on eJapan.
Comments
Voted! Welcome Korea!
Voted!
23 to 15 votes is close. Don't be surprised to see a good level of unrest (and don't just dismiss them as goons).
In a country of several hundred, 42 total votes would hardly be considered a valid or accurate representation of the general eSK sentiment about the current events.
23 to 10 votes, when you consider the confirmed PTOers, is not such a close vote. And even out of those 10, most still stuck by our decision, rather than leaving us immediately.
And, most of the populace is dying and inactive. In reality, there were only about 60-80 active, working citizens. Take out the PTOers, you go down to 50-60. Take away those few citizens who aren't Level 6 yet, and you get about 40-50. So, all things considered, it is a rather accurate vote.
Good to see this article.
This made the process more clear.
I voted no actually, but I had my personal reasons, and understood completely of eSK's turmoils...
I think it's better now though, I have to admit.
I also voted no, but I guess it was economically smart, and as long as its in the best interest of eSK.
Best interests? How can it be in best interest? The nation hasn't even had time to really start off. To give up on a nation so easily. It was economically and physically smart not to fight the war for independence in many countries, but why do people fight them?
If it was in the best interest, all weaker nations should fall under the control of bigger nations, right?
Don't think so