Presidential elections
![United Kingdom](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/United-Kingdom.png)
Keithunder
![](https://media.giphy.com/media/aVe1qzVZmgr2o/giphy.gif)
time=09:51 GMT
The system is simple plurality with no threshold
Huey George................... (W orkers' Rights Party) 59 votes 70%
Pannonian Nomad............... (Gay Pride Party) 25 votes 30%
Total Votes= 84 (-22)
Estimated Quota= 42
Projected Winner
Huey George
![](https://media.giphy.com/media/2gcmmuaqnfMt2/giphy.gif)
Projected Losers
Pannonian Nomad
Last time results
Huey George................... (W orkers' Rights Party) 48 votes 45.3%
Monster Grinder............... (British Patriots) 26 votes 24.5%
Michael Ludgate............... (Pirate Cat Party) 26 votes 24.5%
Mr Immanuel Kant.............. (The Nifty National Front) 3 votes 2.8%
Kavman0000.................... (British Support Party) 3 votes 2.8%
votes vs Party members
Huey George................... (W orkers' Rights Party) 59 votes from 65=91%
Pannonian Nomad............... (Gay Pride Party) 25 votes from 27=93%
Comments
o7
Sorry, I'm running as the candidate of the Gay Pride Party, supported by the Anti- PTO Party...no Pirate Cats.
Vote for Huey or for gay? (President Gay Pride Party) I think it's better to stay aside and hold your ass against the wall.
This homophobic language is unacceptable and not funny (although maybe you are in the closet?). I urge everyone to report you. Please go away!
Be careful, maybe your ass is a replacement for the ballot box
I refer you to my previous comment.
Whilst I agree with the sentiment, I'd point out that suggesting Rusofil74 is in the closet is also a form a homophobic comment. You're implying that a class exists of bad people who make homophobic comments because they are in the closet, being of course homosexuals who've not come out, they are still homosexuals, just haven't come out. Thus a protected class, the homosexual, is being punched down on due to their status of not coming out. Instead of implying that Rusofil74 is bad for holding the status of being in the closet, we should be making him feel accepted for his homosex existence. The flip side, that we don't think he's homosexual, and thus using the suggestion of being closet which requires the status of homosexual, is inappropriate. Using a protected group as a slander for a non member of a protected group, even with the good intention of 'I knew it would upset him, because he's upset by incorrect attribution of status as a homosex person is still inappropriate. I think the sticking point for a lot of people is not realizing that closet status isn't isolated and heterosexual before exiting said closet, i.e. not like being innocent until proven guilty.
People like you Keith disgust me.
You always cry out in pain while striking out at those you dislike.
You (((remind))) me of someone...
What I don't understand is why we have a party dedicated to homosexual lions...?
Why not? Everyone deserves representation.
Vote none.
Good for you.