DoD Orders [Day 3,289 Updated 11:29]
Australian Defence Department
Greetings,
Priority Number #1
Fight for Australia in Victoria
https://www.erepublik.com/en/military/battlefield-new/89193
Priority Number #2
Fight for Cyprus in Al Jawf
https://www.erepublik.com/en/military/battlefield-new/89198
Your MoD Team
Mo
😨Theolor
Comments
o7
eREP REWARDS + FREE RW INFO, November 20th!
https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/birthdays-rewards-rw-info-20--2620764/1/20
Why DO are fighting in our RW when it is 100% guaranteed that they will be won? They are even in the list for Resistance Hero hunters. Seems pointless to waste damage such way. Is that the new strategy to get rid Peru from here?
yes okay...
J I would love to explain it to you here, but since it is a public area I would prefer not too. But if you watch battle timings, damage given etc you will see there is more to it. But considering you say it is 100% shows you dont even pay attention to the battles, where they have been 80 points to 75 etc.
and I must of forgot, where it is classed as wasting damage fighting for your nation. You would notice when there is a DW, that takes 1st priority. But until Peru starts a DW, I cant really set it can I? or neither can Theolor...
DO are edited now but when we have RW and DW simultaneously we need to set only DW as priority.
And when I am online I always have the DW as number 1 priority.
You do realise that the people who edit the DOs cant do anything until they are online, and when they are they will edit it to suit.
So far (I say cautiously, as I still have a good sized pile of Q7) I don't waste damage whether just going for a BH or actually trying to win something. It's nice to RW Tasmania because people can work for a day or two.
When I don't use the free energy that Plato gives me, that is what's a waste.
I can't understand ...
In my opinion it is not healthy all cabinet members to hold same position without seeing other perspective. It is not a matter of fighting for Australia or not but when it is not necessary (because the end of battle is clear and we will win 90😵 then much better to set DO helping our MPP partners. Some day they will return the damage and we will fight as a team with clear position.
J, I respect your opinion, but that is formed with out knowing all the facts, CoTD are set for allies when we can. RWs can be slowed down which help Peru, or sped up which help us.
We have sent more then damage to allies in the past, we have sent cc as well. But that is a two way street. Recently there was a big push to help Hungary, the same nation that ASed us (after planning it with Peru), so should we help them them while we struggle for our freedom?? And while we were being asked to assist the same nation who ASed us in cohorts with Peru our current occupiers, they laughed about taking regions from us.
Winning a battle is only a small part of total strategy, timing, picking which RW to start or plays into it. I personally would love to see Aussies save their energy for the DWs and not blow it on RWs, hence why RWs are always second priority. But it is not as simple as it might seem from where you sit.
That's why Dill will never work great in a cabinet since he sees everything differently, JS. He will always see things differently other than his way.
If this was real life politics, I would have him publically shamed and stripped off all his political achievements, because he is a disgraceful and useless politician.
Seriously Dill is the type of person who will infront of the enemy will tell about internal problems so that they can see it and make the country even weaker.
One word for him: U S E L E S S
Rusty, of course my opinion is formed only from the info I have. How could I know that when this article points Theolor as MoD, furthermore you wrote CP article hours ago without mentioning that we have another MoD as it is already visible at country page.
https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-eaust-cp-update-day-3-288-2620876/1/20
From where I sit nothing looks simple when you do everything useful/useless you want without speaking with the congress. And that we must call democracy?
[removed]