Thoughts on the future for Denmark
•
by pho3nix
Taking critizism from someone apparently under the influence of alcohol is something I find difficult. Especially if he's right. Algaroth's latest article points out that DGIN hasn't presented a plan for Denmark, after her independence has been proclaimed. We have – in a state of depression and despair in our current position – not started brainstorming ideas in every specific topic. Therefore, my plan is to explain some of the things we will try to enforce.
The first thing that would happen to a free Denmark is the inauguration of her Preisdent – which logically will be Grev Per. We have discussed this matter within DGIN, but a non-competing state would probably not be feasible in the long run. During the first time however, a state of political concurrency must be enforced to get the country back on it's feet properly. Companies needs to get started, goods needs to get produced and money needs to start circulating. To enable the general Danish populace to start companies the party will try to start some kind of foundation from which the inhabitants can lend a starting capital at long term, low rate interest. The owners of the foundation will probably be the top politicians of DGIN, however this has more to do with activity than choosing people. I simply don't know how many active players we have in our party, but everyone is welcome to join the foundation.
One thing we cherish is our own market. Thus, we cannot accept a free trade between Denmark and Sweden from day 1. The Swedish market is in comparison too big, and would flood the Danish market with cheap goods – making the Danish companies unable to compete on fair terms. The Poles might have ignored this point in their agreement and accepted free trade between Poland and Sweden. The question is whether the Swedish companies will have any success in Poland (solidarity playing?) or if the Polish companies will have a hard time establishing in their own market. To completely out rule Sweden as a partner in trade is however not our plan. We will focus on establishing the local market before introducing supra-territorial trade.
Politically the party will probably split up in various factions. I have had plans to start a party of my own for some time, for one example. This discussion has not matured enough, since we have seen no concrete actions to liberate Denmark.
Denmark will also not try to enhance it's territory, but plan to keep it's status as a small country made of win. Freedom of alliance is something we would like to have – but we will of course sign a NAA- aswell as an MPP-treaty with Sweden and her allies.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Grev Per avgudar dionisterna i Pakistan och ser dem som sina vänner, hur är det med dig då?
Jag har aldrig varit i kontakt med Pakistanier, så det är svårt att uttala sig i frågan.
Så du läser inte forumen för att sätta dig in i den globala politiken och åsikterna som världsmedborgarna har?
Jag vet vad /v/akistan handlar om, men det är framför allt Danmarks poitik som intresserar mig. 4chan är kul, men det är inte samma sak som eRep.
Danmark förtjänade att bli övertagen
I don\'t see why my potential allies or alleged allies are any concern of yours Toothpaste. As you know, the Pakistani\'s reside in Pakistan.
Please shut up Falkonetti (said in a very gently way.)
You who can not to other things that complain. You should write \"thank you\" because you have not gained any attention at all.
Toothpaste - When the article is in English, it is maybe because it shall be legaible to all, also thoose who are not talking Swedish. Then it is selfish that you write in Swedish.
Btw, I support what you say Pho3nix, without having any specifik comments to it.
Falkonetti was saying his opinion.
You should respect every citizen in the world.
Every citizen is born with rights and duties.
I actually understand him, Denmark (Grev Per) did provocate swedes a bit.
We could complain for years about that, but that is Falkonettis opinion and you have to accept it.
Jack Nicholson, apparently both Falkonetti and Mr David are quite well known for trolling. It\'s best not to pay any attention, then they will get bored and stop. 🙂
In all fairness though, I haven\'t seen MrDavid troll blatantly. Just falkonetti.
You are right Grev Per.
Somehow they are below the mean intelligent, I think.
Nej till ett fritt Danmark.
Oavsett hur vi utformar vår framtida relation till ett självständigt Danmark, blir Danmark ändå ett puppet state till Sverige på ett eller annat sätt.
@Mr David. Respect is earned, not given.
I think you grossly underestimate Danish spirit, Fafner.
Ph03nix, now now everyone deserves respect. People who endeavor to lose openly and in public however are not our problem. Falkonetti is spamming, this is his typical message in any article made by a supporter of Denmark, and I think I will report him for spamming on that basis.
tror inte ett fritt danmark hade funkat, då det lär kosta för mycket att bygga upp ett nytt land och det kommer att tömma resurser.
That doesn\'t make any sense. I still have the Danish treasury.
How much is that?
Its not a matter of gold, its a matter of labour. But you have to start somewhere.
Indeed, however the longer the occupation lasts the more self-fulfilling Swedish doomsaying becomes. However I think most nations are bound to increase when starting with lower numbers. DGIN is almost as large as the entire Danish population when I first joined the game.
Grev Per - I think a \"basic condition\" for having a healthy economy is having at least 500 people steadily working.
Well there have been countries throughout e-history that simply have never been able to fit your definition. A working economy is not necessarily a healthy one, but a working one can become a healthy one. But you and I have very different views on what and who the economy should serve.
@pho3nix: Thanks for answering my ramblings. Voted.