[Presidency] Article #3
Léon Reno
Dear Citizens of South Africa,
Vote here first, please.
This is my 3rd article to inform you.
First of all, I want to congrulate all new Party Presidents. I hope we can work together until the end of term.
Freedom of South Africa
Few citizens always keep talking about this issue. They don't suggest, they do attack. Why? Because I followed to congress' decision. They don't understand that I gave them choices: 1- Freedom no matter what 2- Aggreement. They choiced to deal with both Russia and Uruguay. Both of them have been approved with 66% majority.
They want me to go against congress. I will not do that.
Brazil' NE
At the comment section of our MoD articles, Brazilian people were saying "Your real friend is Brazil!" We already don't believe them but they have proved how good friend they are with their NE proposal.
I promise that we will participate congressional elections and we will kick Brazil out at the end. We didn't sign an aggreement with them again because we want to prove that South Africa is not country that can be invaded anytime.
Official Forums
There is an open discussion in congress about this issue for 5 days. Today, Wacky368 said that someone should find a solution about that so I created a poll which is available for congressmen and honorable citizens. Since noone from congress criticised like "It should be gone to the public", I did like this.
Non-congressman citizens: Please state your opinions about this. If you like, I can turn it into the public-vote.
Impeach
If congress believe that I'm not good enough to lead country, it's their right. Please vote by considering what I did so far. I respect all decisions of congress.
Security Issues
As I promised, no citizen have been illegally accepted so far. Our MoS also work hard to inform our community about application and ask opinion of everyone. Please participate those topics on forums.
Ask Me Anything
I am in touch with your Party President always. If you have in your mind, please feel free to ask question to me or your Party President. Attacking someone without knowladge is the easy way. Suggestion, criticism, etc are benefical ways for our country.
Best Regards,
Léon Reno
Comments
vote first
v
V. Sal 😃
voted
You don´t have to worry about beeing impeached, you´re Congress little lapdog now, they say jump, you ask how high! You promised we´d get to fight Russia and Brazil, you lied! You´re weak, always has been, always will be!
I promised I will give you a chance to get Russia out and I gave it. You didn't want that.
That´s a lie, and you know it! Quit trying to save your face, it´s too late for that. Congress runs this country, not you. You´re so affraid of impeachment that you will betray your voters, shame on you!
Locutus, ffs. Check your PM.
[removed]
I checked my PM´s, you brought up stuff that is invalid as it comes from that unofficial forums and I didn´t read it through because of that! You said to me that if the DB-PF backed you we´d get to fight Brazil AND Russia, you lied! You´re a poor excuse for a CP! A weak little boy, man up ffs!
Locutus 4 CP
" If you have in your mind, please feel free to ask question to me"
Lies.
I did, you have yet to answer.
I will try to get answers from somebody else now.
"Dear Citizens of South Africa"
So.. last time I checked I was still a honorary eSouth African citizen.
next excuse.
Citizenship: Israel
You seem to be slightly dyslexic Mr CP. let me type it slow so you can understan😛 h-o-n-o-r-a-r-y e-S-o-u-t-h A-f-r-i-c-a-n c-i-t-i-z-e-n.
I do believe even you can grasp that concept.
lame excuse dude. Lame excuse.
I have MoFA to inform FOREIGN citizens (;
Lets try pictures cause you really seem a bit slow. http://prntscr.com/1fufye
You introduced yourself as Israel's something, not Honorary Citizen of South Africa.
But to get back on topic since you seem to have a black belt in lame excuses. lets try again:
"Ask Me Anything
I am in touch with your Party President always. If you have in your mind, please feel free to ask question to me or your Party President. Attacking someone without knowladge is the easy way. Suggestion, criticism, etc are benefical ways for our country."
Now even after answering your lame excuse wrt my citizenship, do point out where in that paragraph the words "eSouth African" or "citizen" appears.
Just another one of your lies I suppose. Thank Allah there are actual people willing to help in eSA
eIsrael's something? It's called an ambassador. It was an official request for the official govt position on your dealings with brazil and russia. After a previous PM notifying you that I will be ambassador to eSA this term. Ass.
Since I already started my article with "Dear Citizens of South Africa", you should have understand that this is for SA citizens. If you have any question as SA's honorary citizen, I like to answer it. But I have no time for Israel's something.
Rofl. You're an ass, you know that? Btw, this is my opinion as honorary eSouth African citizen. My opinion as eIsrael's Ambassador is that you are a rude knuckle-dragging troglodyte not worthy of his current office that talks so much crap that he believes it himself.
Here's another question as honorary esouth african citizen: Why do you lie so much?
Is this how eSA CP treats ambasadors? Schocking!
So, wait - you broke a rental agreement two days after being payed, betrayed the same agreement by signing MPPs with Argentina and Uruguay just to enjoy a rare weak moment of eBR in the war against TWO, and now complain that the country NE's you to get those regions - already payed for - back under its control?
LOL
They were suppose to sign an MPP with us every month and protect us against other countries but they did not. So they are the one who broke the aggreement.
The MPP signing was not done to avoid wasting eSA's money, and was always agreed with the current CP.
The protection was simply not requested, as your former CP signed the agreement with Russia - that you also renewed. Who should eBR protect eSA from? Should eBR fight eRussia against eSA's will, simply because they paid you a lot to rent a region?
We aggreed Russian deal this month, not last month. If Brazil offered help last month against them but our CP rejected it, I'd like to see proof and apologize for my words.
There was no offer for help as there was no request for help, simply because there was no need. Your former CP *agreed to the russian deal*.
Now, if you think that it should have been approved by the congress before, or if it wasn't done properly, or whatever - that is something between that month's congress and that month's CP. As far as the rest of the world is concerned, the deal was properly signed last month.
The Russian deal was preliminarily verbally agreed, but unpublished and thus unofficial because South Africa's congress refused to confirm the details of a final draft.
Russia, rightly, were only prepared to pay once the treaty was published. It was only published in July and thus only went into effect in July under President Léon with improved rental terms.
Protection did not have to be requested. It was part of the contract. Russia invaded eSA and Brazil stood by and watched.
And we have been signing an MPP every 3 days, why would we not want the agreed upon MPP with Brazil? You betrayed us.
Russia did not invade - Russia rented. You should really talk to your former CPs about it. Oh, and I just remembered that your current CP (after the previous one was impeached) also did not request - or otherwise spoke anything - about the russian agreement.
One day eBR pays the rent and Russia is signing a rental contract, the next day there is an impeachment, and the next one eSA takes all the money and signs with eBR's enemies. That's not just breaking an agreement, that is stealing money.
Our congress voted no to that and that president was impeached. You should talk to our congress and not CP when we have a rogue CP. Especially considering that congress created the contract, not CP.
Nope. No one on the entire eworld talks to the congress of the other countries - external relations are done by the CP and the MoFA. If congress is unhappy with the CP, they take him out.
Thing is, your new CP (after the impeachment) never actually contacted eBR. Never said anything. He just kept the money, broke the contract with eBR, formalized the contract with Russia, and used it as an excuse to sign with eBR enemies.
And after president was impeached and Cody Caine became CP who was our new MoFA? Me.
I talked to many countries during my term as MoFA but not once did Brazilian CP or MoFA approach me, so your argument is void.
eSA did NOT have responsibility to ask for help. Brazil DID have responsibility to help. The contract said Brazil had to help. Not eSA has to ask for help. Why should we ask for something you already agreed to do??
You did not contact President or me.
So, wait - you just admitted that you never approached Brazil to say there was a problem with the agreement that your former CP made. So let's change the wording, since you are reluctant with the 'asking for help' - you never actually *notified* Brasil that there was a problem.
So, naturally, you assumed that the brazilian government had to know, in detail, everything that was going on in eSA's congress? You just assumed Brasil had to airstrike Russia (no borders available), because a *valid tready* your former CP made was suddenly no longer valid after the impeachment?
Russia did not invade South Africa. We agreed to host them for a Congress election. I know because I made that agreement with Brazil, Russia and South Africa's CP, MoFA and MoD's present.
Brazil told us up-front that they would honour whatever decision South Africa reached. Russia did too. Agreement was made to unlock opportunity and not under duress. It succeeded gloriously.
You paint an unnecessary lie to support false perception.
nW0lf no rent was paid in June or July.
I, the then CP instructed Grimstone to return the rent in lieu of both CP re-affirming the treaty are stipulated, or renegotiating the terms which we have been concerned about for well over 6 months.
We never got to a public affirmation with both CPs affirming the agreement within 5 days of taking office as stipulated by the NAP. In fact, no Brazilian nor South African CP have affirmed the treaty monthly as required for the last 2 years. It was also not affirmed Léon assumed office.
Brazil making payment and South Africa accepting payment in the past could be seen as tacit acceptance. We accept this as a reasonable legal interpretation.
This did not occur for June nor July.
The treaty is thus null and void.
Oh, but it *was* paid. We still haven't seen it back though.
We do agree it was broken, we just don't agree when. The contract says:
"will remain in effect until the day on which either party notifies the other of its intention to terminate or renegotiate the Treaty,"
eSA did not notify anything. True, there was no formal confirmation, but it had been going for so long (and with verbal agreement from the previous CPs), was it really necessary?
"will become null and void if broken by either country, with the country breaking the Treaty being required to compensate the other country with the guaranteed penalty of 250 Gold, as agreed."
Now, who owns who the penalty?
Now you are just lying to my face. Grimstone personally returned it to MaulMaul on my instruction.
Selective reading is not your friend in a literate society:
4) This Non-Aggression Treaty
a) will remain in effect until the day on which either party notifies the other of its intention to terminate or renegotiate the Treaty,
b) will, however, be reviewed by both countries every 90 days, unless a change in game mechanics affecting the resources provided by regions has a material affect on the terms of the Treaty,
c) will be confirmed by successive governments of both countries each Presidential term by the addition to the Treaty of the signature of the current President within 48 hours of taking office, and
d) will become null and void if broken by either country, with the country breaking the Treaty being required to compensate the other country with the guaranteed penalty of 250 Gold, as agreed.
4c is a mutual breach. I guess we owe each other 250G. Want to write it off or exchange cheques?
You should check with your team before accusing anyone of lying. That money never reached eBR.
My point about that the "selective reading" is that the other points had been neglected for so long - and yet, both countries continued to consider the agreement valid - that there is no reason to suddenly consider it a breach now.
You were just looking for an excuse to break the agreement. You could have done it the proper way, notifying that you didn't want to renew it, and eBR would leave - but you chose not to. You chose to take the money and sign with Uruguay and Argentina, and now come up with technicalities. It could have been just a commercial agreement undone, but it turned to plain and simple treason.
rare weak moment of eBR? Its been for a while and it will get worse. Things change.
Yeah, they do change. Uruguai gets erased again... :trollface:
I illegally accepted Wilpanzer actually
I am PTO
Lol
I wonder why nothing was said about that?
Yeah I planned on posting it on forum, but didn't know which one.
Wilpanzer is honorary citizen. MoS approval is not necessary.
But hey, LI already knows that. Next execuse please.