Difference between TEDEN and ONE

Day 1,580, 07:18 • Published in Chile Cyprus • by L30n4rdo



Two alliances, two rivals.

So, whats the difference of TEDEN and ONE?
The answer is simple: There is no difference

Some months ago all TEDEN members were proud of their alliance. There was a true brotherhood and everybody knew it. ONE's domination had smashed every possible internal conflict. There was no chance for damage against your ally since most of countries were deleted or in a very bad situation.

On the other hand, TEDEN tried to be benefited from ONE's internal conflicts. And TEDEN succeeded in it. I still remember the conflicts between FYROM and Poland. Serbia and Turkey (when Turkey was in ONE), Iran and Turkey. TEDEN became stronger through these incidents.

Since then, situation has changed much. TEDEN's domination is a fact. But a fact is also that there is no Brotherhood anymore.

TEDEN became the same thing with ONE. They are getting used to it and they are very very pissed off. Now, we have to deal with many (not all) opportunist countries who put their egoism and personal benefit first.

The examples are numerous. From the damage of Bulgarians against Turkey, to the Israelians stealing a needless for them region from Cyprus that cut their bonus.



There are more & more examples but i dont want to take it so long. Everybody knows.

Then, where does this power of TEDEN come from?
In my point of view, TEDEN relies on the completely different timezone of very strong countries like South/North Americans, China etc. Moreover there is a better strategy and a better sharing of damage through battles.


Give a shout if you wish