Join the new world

Note: fűck means "meatballs" in Swedish, and is therefore distinctly different from the vulgar "f*ck" we hate and despise.

Rob's article got taken down for spam and vulgarity so I have reuploaded it here

Several times

Each time you read it you gain a deeper understanding of the meaning of life


PASTEBINnew pastetrends

Pastebin PRO Accounts CHRISTMAS SPECIAL! For a limited time only. Get 40% discount on a LIFETIME PRO account!

Plato can get in the fucking sea
A GUEST DEC 17TH, 2015 104 NEVER

rawdownloadreport 3.86 KB


Right, 'ello. Neil left. That's the topic. Why'd he do that m8? summink about not liking nifty causing conspiracy theories, willy jokes and some other stuff creating probably the best last words ever seen:

Anywwaaaayyy, beyond Addaway being potentially one of the saltiest mofos in existence I've been struggling to find any reasons for the anti-nifty sentiment which started this, 'cause regardless of who allegedly bullied/didn't bully who and who should/shouldn't "play the victim", it started because of a Neil anti-nifty sentiment appearing outta nowhere causing some hardcore arguments in mongress and elsewhere.

Mad Pauly gave me a decent explanation of his view, which I will take to be the view of everybody else because I have literally no better idea.


I suppose if you hold that view and combine it with Add being salty, one can perhaps begin to grasp what the crack was.

However, this view in itself... hmm.


Ok so the first thing coming to my head is that it's been mainly nifty CPs because... errr... people are voting for them? You know...

But then there's the issue of ministers. Creating a cabinet has always been DodgyTerritory®, even before Fata made a daft MU with some mates. Here's a chart of things would have to consider if they wanted to create a cabinet that pleased literally everybody it got so big good lord the efforts I have went to:


You following so far? Ok... now you see that pre-nifty it was already a complex issue, but people just about managed back before MUs were a thing that needed to be considered. If we throw nifty onto the en😛



D0 Y0U S33 TH3 PR0BL3M? It's a bit difficult. You've tried to fulfill everything, but now suddenly happening to have most people from the same MU makes you a none-inclusive scumbag. Gets more iffy than trying to crack a joke on tumblr that doesn't offend somebody...

A potential solution suggested by Mad "the lad" Pauly, is as follows:


Intriguing, could work to some degree. An immediate problem I spot tho is that as the pretty much "better" guy is the less senior minister, if the more senior guy does something a bit wrong the better guy doesn't really seem to have the authority to step in and make sure everything is fine and dandy.

The second alternative is getting the ol' deputy jobs out and handing them over to the newby dudes, but gawd those can be boring. One could just have more ministers, all on pretty much equal power. This can be real gud for MoHA, and to a degree can be handy for MoD as if orders change there's a higher chance of there being somebody online to sort the changes out quickly. But the CP's got the issue of having to manage more guys, make sure these extra guys fulfill all those other things on the chart, and I can imagine that a large number of dudes as MoFA could get weird in places. Of course this could all be workable, but it's a bit dodgy.

Anyway, summing to think about, but I would argue that being anti-nifty based almost entirely on the reason that they get a lot of cabinet jobs makes things quite mental for when prospective CPs wanna sort a squad out.

Whatever, debate it or something.

---

-Rob the Bruce
RAW Paste Data



Right, 'ello. Neil left. That's the topic. Why'd he do that m8? summink about not liking nifty causing conspiracy theories, willy jokes and some other stuff creating probably the best last words ever seen:


Anywwaaaayyy, beyond Addaway being potentially one of the saltiest mofos in existence I've been struggling to find any reasons for the anti-nifty sentiment which started this, 'cause regardless of who allegedly bullied/didn't bully who and who should/shouldn't "play the victim", it started because of a Neil anti-nifty sentiment appearing outta nowhere causing some hardcore arguments in mongress and elsewhere.

Mad Pauly gave me a decent explanation of his view, which I will take to be the view of everybody else because I have literally no better idea.


I suppose if you hold that view and combine it with Add being salty, one can perhaps begin to grasp what the crack was.

However, this view in itself... hmm.


Ok so the first thing coming to my head is that it's been mainly nifty CPs because... errr... people are voting for them? You know...

But then there's the issue of ministers. Creating a cabinet has always been DodgyTerritory®, even before Fata made a daft MU with some mates. Here's a chart of things would have to consider if they wanted to create a cabinet that pleased literally everybody it got so big good lord the efforts I have went to:


You following so far? Ok... now you see that pre-nifty it was already a complex issue, but people just about managed back before MUs were a thing that needed to be considered. If we throw nifty onto the en😛



D0 Y0U S33 TH3 PR0BL3M? It's a bit difficult. You've tried to fulfill everything, but now suddenly happening to have most people from the same MU makes you a none-inclusive scumbag. Gets more iffy than trying to crack a joke on tumblr that doesn't offend somebody...

A potential solution suggested by Mad "the lad" Pauly, is as follows:


Intriguing, could work to some degree. An immediate problem I spot tho is that as the pretty much "better" guy is the less senior minister, if the more senior guy does something a bit wrong the better guy doesn't really seem to have the authority to step in and make sure everything is fine and dandy.

The second alternative is getting the ol' deputy jobs out and handing them over to the newby dudes, but gawd those can be boring. One could just have more ministers, all on pretty much equal power. This can be real gud for MoHA, and to a degree can be handy for MoD as if orders change there's a higher chance of there being somebody online to sort the changes out quickly. But the CP's got the issue of having to manage more guys, make sure these extra guys fulfill all those other things on the chart, and I can imagine that a large number of dudes as MoFA could get weird in places. Of course this could all be workable, but it's a bit dodgy.

Anyway, summing to think about, but I would argue that being anti-nifty based almost entirely on the reason that they get a lot of cabinet jobs makes things quite mental for when prospective CPs wanna sort a squad out.

Whatever, debate it or something.

---

-Rob the Bruce


create new paste / api / trends / syntax languages / faq / tools / privacy / cookies / contact / dmca / advertise on pastebin / scraping / go
Dedicated Server Hosting by Steadfast

PASTEBINnew pastetrends

Pastebin PRO Accounts CHRISTMAS SPECIAL! For a limited time only. Get 40% discount on a LIFETIME PRO account!

Plato can get in the fucking sea
A GUEST DEC 17TH, 2015 104 NEVER

rawdownloadreport 3.86 KB


Right, 'ello. Neil left. That's the topic. Why'd he do that m8? summink about not liking nifty causing conspiracy theories, willy jokes and some other stuff creating probably the best last words ever seen:


Anywwaaaayyy, beyond Addaway being potentially one of the saltiest mofos in existence I've been struggling to find any reasons for the anti-nifty sentiment which started this, 'cause regardless of who allegedly bullied/didn't bully who and who should/shouldn't "play the victim", it started because of a Neil anti-nifty sentiment appearing outta nowhere causing some hardcore arguments in mongress and elsewhere.

Mad Pauly gave me a decent explanation of his view, which I will take to be the view of everybody else because I have literally no better idea.


I suppose if you hold that view and combine it with Add being salty, one can perhaps begin to grasp what the crack was.

However, this view in itself... hmm.


Ok so the first thing coming to my head is that it's been mainly nifty CPs because... errr... people are voting for them? You know...

But then there's the issue of ministers. Creating a cabinet has always been DodgyTerritory®, even before Fata made a daft MU with some mates. Here's a chart of things would have to consider if they wanted to create a cabinet that pleased literally everybody it got so big good lord the efforts I have went to:


You following so far? Ok... now you see that pre-nifty it was already a complex issue, but people just about managed back before MUs were a thing that needed to be considered. If we throw nifty onto the en😛



D0 Y0U S33 TH3 PR0BL3M? It's a bit difficult. You've tried to fulfill everything, but now suddenly happening to have most people from the same MU makes you a none-inclusive scumbag. Gets more iffy than trying to crack a joke on tumblr that doesn't offend somebody...

A potential solution suggested by Mad "the lad" Pauly, is as follows:


Intriguing, could work to some degree. An immediate problem I spot tho is that as the pretty much "better" guy is the less senior minister, if the more senior guy does something a bit wrong the better guy doesn't really seem to have the authority to step in and make sure everything is fine and dandy.

The second alternative is getting the ol' deputy jobs out and handing them over to the newby dudes, but gawd those can be boring. One could just have more ministers, all on pretty much equal power. This can be real gud for MoHA, and to a degree can be handy for MoD as if orders change there's a higher chance of there being somebody online to sort the changes out quickly. But the CP's got the issue of having to manage more guys, make sure these extra guys fulfill all those other things on the chart, and I can imagine that a large number of dudes as MoFA could get weird in places. Of course this could all be workable, but it's a bit dodgy.

Anyway, summing to think about, but I would argue that being anti-nifty based almost entirely on the reason that they get a lot of cabinet jobs makes things quite mental for when prospective CPs wanna sort a squad out.

Whatever, debate it or something.

---

-Rob the Bruce
RAW Paste Data



Right, 'ello. Neil left. That's the topic. Why'd he do that m8? summink about not liking nifty causing conspiracy theories, willy jokes and some other stuff creating probably the best last words ever seen:


Anywwaaaayyy, beyond Addaway being potentially one of the saltiest mofos in existence I've been struggling to find any reasons for the anti-nifty sentiment which started this, 'cause regardless of who allegedly bullied/didn't bully who and who should/shouldn't "play the victim", it started because of a Neil anti-nifty sentiment appearing outta nowhere causing some hardcore arguments in mongress and elsewhere.

Mad Pauly gave me a decent explanation of his view, which I will take to be the view of everybody else because I have literally no better idea.


I suppose if you hold that view and combine it with Add being salty, one can perhaps begin to grasp what the crack was.

However, this view in itself... hmm.


Ok so the first thing coming to my head is that it's been mainly nifty CPs because... errr... people are voting for them? You know...

But then there's the issue of ministers. Creating a cabinet has always been DodgyTerritory®, even before Fata made a daft MU with some mates. Here's a chart of things would have to consider if they wanted to create a cabinet that pleased literally everybody it got so big good lord the efforts I have went to:


You following so far? Ok... now you see that pre-nifty it was already a complex issue, but people just about managed back before MUs were a thing that needed to be considered. If we throw nifty onto the en😛



D0 Y0U S33 TH3 PR0BL3M? It's a bit difficult. You've tried to fulfill everything, but now suddenly happening to have most people from the same MU makes you a none-inclusive scumbag. Gets more iffy than trying to crack a joke on tumblr that doesn't offend somebody...

A potential solution suggested by Mad "the lad" Pauly, is as follows:


Intriguing, could work to some degree. An immediate problem I spot tho is that as the pretty much "better" guy is the less senior minister, if the more senior guy does something a bit wrong the better guy doesn't really seem to have the authority to step in and make sure everything is fine and dandy.

The second alternative is getting the ol' deputy jobs out and handing them over to the newby dudes, but gawd those can be boring. One could just have more ministers, all on pretty much equal power. This can be real gud for MoHA, and to a degree can be handy for MoD as if orders change there's a higher chance of there being somebody online to sort the changes out quickly. But the CP's got the issue of having to manage more guys, make sure these extra guys fulfill all those other things on the chart, and I can imagine that a large number of dudes as MoFA could get weird in places. Of course this could all be workable, but it's a bit dodgy.

Anyway, summing to think about, but I would argue that being anti-nifty based almost entirely on the reason that they get a lot of cabinet jobs makes things quite mental for when prospective CPs wanna sort a squad out.

Whatever, debate it or something.

---

-Rob the Bruce


create new paste / api / trends / syntax languages / faq / tools / privacy / cookies / contact / dmca / advertise on pastebin / scraping / go
Dedicated Server Hosting by Steadfast
PASTEBINnew pastetrends

Pastebin PRO Accounts CHRISTMAS SPECIAL! For a limited time only. Get 40% discount on a LIFETIME PRO account!

Plato can get in the fucking sea
A GUEST DEC 17TH, 2015 104 NEVER

rawdownloadreport 3.86 KB


Right, 'ello. Neil left. That's the topic. Why'd he do that m8? summink about not liking nifty causing conspiracy theories, willy jokes and some other stuff creating probably the best last words ever seen:


Anywwaaaayyy, beyond Addaway being potentially one of the saltiest mofos in existence I've been struggling to find any reasons for the anti-nifty sentiment which started this, 'cause regardless of who allegedly bullied/didn't bully who and who should/shouldn't "play the victim", it started because of a Neil anti-nifty sentiment appearing outta nowhere causing some hardcore arguments in mongress and elsewhere.

Mad Pauly gave me a decent explanation of his view, which I will take to be the view of everybody else because I have literally no better idea.


I suppose if you hold that view and combine it with Add being salty, one can perhaps begin to grasp what the crack was.

However, this view in itself... hmm.


Ok so the first thing coming to my head is that it's been mainly nifty CPs because... errr... people are voting for them? You know...

But then there's the issue of ministers. Creating a cabinet has always been DodgyTerritory®, even before Fata made a daft MU with some mates. Here's a chart of things would have to consider if they wanted to create a cabinet that pleased literally everybody it got so big good lord the efforts I have went to:


You following so far? Ok... now you see that pre-nifty it was already a complex issue, but people just about managed back before MUs were a thing that needed to be considered. If we throw nifty onto the en😛



D0 Y0U S33 TH3 PR0BL3M? It's a bit difficult. You've tried to fulfill everything, but now suddenly happening to have most people from the same MU makes you a none-inclusive scumbag. Gets more iffy than trying to crack a joke on tumblr that doesn't offend somebody...

A potential solution suggested by Mad "the lad" Pauly, is as follows:


Intriguing, could work to some degree. An immediate problem I spot tho is that as the pretty much "better" guy is the less senior minister, if the more senior guy does something a bit wrong the better guy doesn't really seem to have the authority to step in and make sure everything is fine and dandy.

The second alternative is getting the ol' deputy jobs out and handing them over to the newby dudes, but gawd those can be boring. One could just have more ministers, all on pretty much equal power. This can be real gud for MoHA, and to a degree can be handy for MoD as if orders change there's a higher chance of there being somebody online to sort the changes out quickly. But the CP's got the issue of having to manage more guys, make sure these extra guys fulfill all those other things on the chart, and I can imagine that a large number of dudes as MoFA could get weird in places. Of course this could all be workable, but it's a bit dodgy.

Anyway, summing to think about, but I would argue that being anti-nifty based almost entirely on the reason that they get a lot of cabinet jobs makes things quite mental for when prospective CPs wanna sort a squad out.

Whatever, debate it or something.

---

-Rob the Bruce
RAW Paste Data



Right, 'ello. Neil left. That's the topic. Why'd he do that m8? summink about not liking nifty causing conspiracy theories, willy jokes and some other stuff creating probably the best last words ever seen:


Anywwaaaayyy, beyond Addaway being potentially one of the saltiest mofos in existence I've been struggling to find any reasons for the anti-nifty sentiment which started this, 'cause regardless of who allegedly bullied/didn't bully who and who should/shouldn't "play the victim", it started because of a Neil anti-nifty sentiment appearing outta nowhere causing some hardcore arguments in mongress and elsewhere.

Mad Pauly gave me a decent explanation of his view, which I will take to be the view of everybody else because I have literally no better idea.


I suppose if you hold that view and combine it with Add being salty, one can perhaps begin to grasp what the crack was.

However, this view in itself... hmm.


Ok so the first thing coming to my head is that it's been mainly nifty CPs because... errr... people are voting for them? You know...

But then there's the issue of ministers. Creating a cabinet has always been DodgyTerritory®, even before Fata made a daft MU with some mates. Here's a chart of things would have to consider if they wanted to create a cabinet that pleased literally everybody it got so big good lord the efforts I have went to:


You following so far? Ok... now you see that pre-nifty it was already a complex issue, but people just about managed back before MUs were a thing that needed to be considered. If we throw nifty onto the en😛



D0 Y0U S33 TH3 PR0BL3M? It's a bit difficult. You've tried to fulfill everything, but now suddenly happening to have most people from the same MU makes you a none-inclusive scumbag. Gets more iffy than trying to crack a joke on tumblr that doesn't offend somebody...

A potential solution suggested by Mad "the lad" Pauly, is as follows:


Intriguing, could work to some degree. An immediate problem I spot tho is that as the pretty much "better" guy is the less senior minister, if the more senior guy does something a bit wrong the better guy doesn't really seem to have the authority to step in and make sure everything is fine and dandy.

The second alternative is getting the ol' deputy jobs out and handing them over to the newby dudes, but gawd those can be boring. One could just have more ministers, all on pretty much equal power. This can be real gud for MoHA, and to a degree can be handy for MoD as if orders change there's a higher chance of there being somebody online to sort the changes out quickly. But the CP's got the issue of having to manage more guys, make sure these extra guys fulfill all those other things on the chart, and I can imagine that a large number of dudes as MoFA could get weird in places. Of course this could all be workable, but it's a bit dodgy.

Anyway, summing to think about, but I would argue that being anti-nifty based almost entirely on the reason that they get a lot of cabinet jobs makes things quite mental for when prospective CPs wanna sort a squad out.

Whatever, debate it or something.

---

-Rob the Bruce


create new paste / api / trends / syntax languages / faq / tools / privacy / cookies / contact / dmca / advertise on pastebin / scraping / go
Dedicated Server Hosting by Steadfast
PASTEBINnew pastetrends

Pastebin PRO Accounts CHRISTMAS SPECIAL! For a limited time only. Get 40% discount on a LIFETIME PRO account!

Plato can get in the fucking sea
A GUEST DEC 17TH, 2015 104 NEVER

rawdownloadreport 3.86 KB


Right, 'ello. Neil left. That's the topic. Why'd he do that m8? summink about not liking nifty causing conspiracy theories, willy jokes and some other stuff creating probably the best last words ever seen:


Anywwaaaayyy, beyond Addaway being potentially one of the saltiest mofos in existence I've been struggling to find any reasons for the anti-nifty sentiment which started this, 'cause regardless of who allegedly bullied/didn't bully who and who should/shouldn't "play the victim", it started because of a Neil anti-nifty sentiment appearing outta nowhere causing some hardcore arguments in mongress and elsewhere.

Mad Pauly gave me a decent explanation of his view, which I will take to be the view of everybody else because I have literally no better idea.


I suppose if you hold that view and combine it with Add being salty, one can perhaps begin to grasp what the crack was.

However, this view in itself... hmm.


Ok so the first thing coming to my head is that it's been mainly nifty CPs because... errr... people are voting for them? You know...

But then there's the issue of ministers. Creating a cabinet has always been DodgyTerritory®, even before Fata made a daft MU with some mates. Here's a chart of things would have to consider if they wanted to create a cabinet that pleased literally everybody it got so big good lord the efforts I have went to:


You following so far? Ok... now you see that pre-nifty it was already a complex issue, but people just about managed back before MUs were a thing that needed to be considered. If we throw nifty onto the en😛



D0 Y0U S33 TH3 PR0BL3M? It's a bit difficult. You've tried to fulfill everything, but now suddenly happening to have most people from the same MU makes you a none-inclusive scumbag. Gets more iffy than trying to crack a joke on tumblr that doesn't offend somebody...

A potential solution suggested by Mad "the lad" Pauly, is as follows:


Intriguing, could work to some degree. An immediate problem I spot tho is that as the pretty much "better" guy is the less senior minister, if the more senior guy does something a bit wrong the better guy doesn't really seem to have the authority to step in and make sure everything is fine and dandy.

The second alternative is getting the ol' deputy jobs out and handing them over to the newby dudes, but gawd those can be boring. One could just have more ministers, all on pretty much equal power. This can be real gud for MoHA, and to a degree can be handy for MoD as if orders change there's a higher chance of there being somebody online to sort the changes out quickly. But the CP's got the issue of having to manage more guys, make sure these extra guys fulfill all those other things on the chart, and I can imagine that a large number of dudes as MoFA could get weird in places. Of course this could all be workable, but it's a bit dodgy.

Anyway, summing to think about, but I would argue that being anti-nifty based almost entirely on the reason that they get a lot of cabinet jobs makes things quite mental for when prospective CPs wanna sort a squad out.

Whatever, debate it or something.

---

-Rob the Bruce
RAW Paste Data



Right, 'ello. Neil left. That's the topic. Why'd he do that m8? summink about not liking nifty causing conspiracy theories, willy jokes and some other stuff creating probably the best last words ever seen:


Anywwaaaayyy, beyond Addaway being potentially one of the saltiest mofos in existence I've been struggling to find any reasons for the anti-nifty sentiment which started this, 'cause regardless of who allegedly bullied/didn't bully who and who should/shouldn't "play the victim", it started because of a Neil anti-nifty sentiment appearing outta nowhere causing some hardcore arguments in mongress and elsewhere.

Mad Pauly gave me a decent explanation of his view, which I will take to be the view of everybody else because I have literally no better idea.


I suppose if you hold that view and combine it with Add being salty, one can perhaps begin to grasp what the crack was.

However, this view in itself... hmm.


Ok so the first thing coming to my head is that it's been mainly nifty CPs because... errr... people are voting for them? You know...

But then there's the issue of ministers. Creating a cabinet has always been DodgyTerritory®, even before Fata made a daft MU with some mates. Here's a chart of things would have to consider if they wanted to create a cabinet that pleased literally everybody it got so big good lord the efforts I have went to:


You following so far? Ok... now you see that pre-nifty it was already a complex issue, but people just about managed back before MUs were a thing that needed to be considered. If we throw nifty onto the en😛



D0 Y0U S33 TH3 PR0BL3M? It's a bit difficult. You've tried to fulfill everything, but now suddenly happening to have most people from the same MU makes you a none-inclusive scumbag. Gets more iffy than trying to crack a joke on tumblr that doesn't offend somebody...

A potential solution suggested by Mad "the lad" Pauly, is as follows:


Intriguing, could work to some degree. An immediate problem I spot tho is that as the pretty much "better" guy is the less senior minister, if the more senior guy does something a bit wrong the better guy doesn't really seem to have the authority to step in and make sure everything is fine and dandy.

The second alternative is getting the ol' deputy jobs out and handing them over to the newby dudes, but gawd those can be boring. One could just have more ministers, all on pretty much equal power. This can be real gud for MoHA, and to a degree can be handy for MoD as if orders change there's a higher chance of there being somebody online to sort the changes out quickly. But the CP's got the issue of having to manage more guys, make sure these extra guys fulfill all those other things on the chart, and I can imagine that a large number of dudes as MoFA could get weird in places. Of course this could all be workable, but it's a bit dodgy.

Anyway, summing to think about, but I would argue that being anti-nifty based almost entirely on the reason that they get a lot of cabinet jobs makes things quite mental for when prospective CPs wanna sort a squad out.

Whatever, debate it or something.

---

-Rob the Bruce


create new paste / api / trends / syntax languages / faq / tools / privacy / cookies / contact / dmca / advertise on pastebin / scraping / go
Dedicated Server Hosting by Steadfast
PASTEBINnew pastetrends

Pastebin PRO Accounts CHRISTMAS SPECIAL! For a limited time only. Get 40% discount on a LIFETIME PRO account!

Plato can get in the fucking sea
A GUEST DEC 17TH, 2015 104 NEVER

rawdownloadreport 3.86 KB


Right, 'ello. Neil left. That's the topic. Why'd he do that m8? summink about not liking nifty causing conspiracy theories, willy jokes and some other stuff creating probably the best last words ever seen:


Anywwaaaayyy, beyond Addaway being potentially one of the saltiest mofos in existence I've been struggling to find any reasons for the anti-nifty sentiment which started this, 'cause regardless of who allegedly bullied/didn't bully who and who should/shouldn't "play the victim", it started because of a Neil anti-nifty sentiment appearing outta nowhere causing some hardcore arguments in mongress and elsewhere.

Mad Pauly gave me a decent explanation of his view, which I will take to be the view of everybody else because I have literally no better idea.


I suppose if you hold that view and combine it with Add being salty, one can perhaps begin to grasp what the crack was.

However, this view in itself... hmm.


Ok so the first thing coming to my head is that it's been mainly nifty CPs because... errr... people are voting for them? You know...

But then there's the issue of ministers. Creating a cabinet has always been DodgyTerritory®, even before Fata made a daft MU with some mates. Here's a chart of things would have to consider if they wanted to create a cabinet that pleased literally everybody it got so big good lord the efforts I have went to:


You following so far? Ok... now you see that pre-nifty it was already a complex issue, but people just about managed back before MUs were a thing that needed to be considered. If we throw nifty onto the en😛



D0 Y0U S33 TH3 PR0BL3M? It's a bit difficult. You've tried to fulfill everything, but now suddenly happening to have most people from the same MU makes you a none-inclusive scumbag. Gets more iffy than trying to crack a joke on tumblr that doesn't offend somebody...

A potential solution suggested by Mad "the lad" Pauly, is as follows:


Intriguing, could work to some degree. An immediate problem I spot tho is that as the pretty much "better" guy is the less senior minister, if the more senior guy does something a bit wrong the better guy doesn't really seem to have the authority to step in and make sure everything is fine and dandy.

The second alternative is getting the ol' deputy jobs out and handing them over to the newby dudes, but gawd those can be boring. One could just have more ministers, all on pretty much equal power. This can be real gud for MoHA, and to a degree can be handy for MoD as if orders change there's a higher chance of there being somebody online to sort the changes out quickly. But the CP's got the issue of having to manage more guys, make sure these extra guys fulfill all those other things on the chart, and I can imagine that a large number of dudes as MoFA could get weird in places. Of course this could all be workable, but it's a bit dodgy.

Anyway, summing to think about, but I would argue that being anti-nifty based almost entirely on the reason that they get a lot of cabinet jobs makes things quite mental for when prospective CPs wanna sort a squad out.

Whatever, debate it or something.

---

-Rob the Bruce
RAW Paste Data



Right, 'ello. Neil left. That's the topic. Why'd he do that m8? summink about not liking nifty causing conspiracy theories, willy jokes and some other stuff creating probably the best last words ever seen:


Anywwaaaayyy, beyond Addaway being potentially one of the saltiest mofos in existence I've been struggling to find any reasons for the anti-nifty sentiment which started this, 'cause regardless of who allegedly bullied/didn't bully who and who should/shouldn't "play the victim", it started because of a Neil anti-nifty sentiment appearing outta nowhere causing some hardcore arguments in mongress and elsewhere.

Mad Pauly gave me a decent explanation of his view, which I will take to be the view of everybody else because I have literally no better idea.


I suppose if you hold that view and combine it with Add being salty, one can perhaps begin to grasp what the crack was.

However, this view in itself... hmm.


Ok so the first thing coming to my head is that it's been mainly nifty CPs because... errr... people are voting for them? You know...

But then there's the issue of ministers. Creating a cabinet has always been DodgyTerritory®, even before Fata made a daft MU with some mates. Here's a chart of things would have to consider if they wanted to create a cabinet that pleased literally everybody it got so big good lord the efforts I have went to:


You following so far? Ok... now you see that pre-nifty it was already a complex issue, but people just about managed back before MUs were a thing that needed to be considered. If we throw nifty onto the en😛



D0 Y0U S33 TH3 PR0BL3M? It's a bit difficult. You've tried to fulfill everything, but now suddenly happening to have most people from the same MU makes you a none-inclusive scumbag. Gets more iffy than trying to crack a joke on tumblr that doesn't offend somebody...

A potential solution suggested by Mad "the lad" Pauly, is as follows:


Intriguing, could work to some degree. An immediate problem I spot tho is that as the pretty much "better" guy is the less senior minister, if the more senior guy does something a bit wrong the better guy doesn't really seem to have the authority to step in and make sure everything is fine and dandy.

The second alternative is getting the ol' deputy jobs out and handing them over to the newby dudes, but gawd those can be boring. One could just have more ministers, all on pretty much equal power. This can be real gud for MoHA, and to a degree can be handy for MoD as if orders change there's a higher chance of there being somebody online to sort the changes out quickly. But the CP's got the issue of having to manage more guys, make sure these extra guys fulfill all those other things on the chart, and I can imagine that a large number of dudes as MoFA could get weird in places. Of course this could all be workable, but it's a bit dodgy.

Anyway, summing to think about, but I would argue that being anti-nifty based almost entirely on the reason that they get a lot of cabinet jobs makes things quite mental for when prospective CPs wanna sort a squad out.

Whatever, debate it or something.

---

-Rob the Bruce


create new paste / api / trends / syntax languages / faq / tools / privacy / cookies / contact / dmca / advertise on pastebin / scraping / go
Dedicated Server Hosting by Steadfast