Artela, Israel Stevens; I object!
![USA](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/USA.png)
Yui MHCP001
This article is in response to Israel Stevens (http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/because-you-deserve-a-debate-2334629/1/20), and Artela's (http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-artela-a-surprising-turn-of-events-2334884/1/20) articles.
I object.
I do not like the idea of opening the presidency to the newer players of this current community. Most people of this eCommunity are not efficient leaders.
And what happens when an inefficient leader is elected? We get the opposite of progress, which is what we need in our current state.
We need an absolute known-to-be efficient leader. Some examples:
Paul_Proteus
Artela
Israel Stevens
Fingerguns (may you eRIP)
Josh Frost
and many more.
Some may refer to these people as "Elitists". But, Dio be damned, we need these Elitists. We are in a bad position. And we need people to bring us out of the situation that Spain and Poland have put us in.
We need you Artela.
We need you Israel Stevens.
And frankly, we don't need anyone else.
(Jfrost please run again q_q)
-Leo
Comments
lol
Awwww.... :3
I believe that our role as experienced leaders should be one of guiding new players. The ones that are hungry to prove themselves and want to see their ideas get absorbed into the community. Those are the people that should be leading us.
Not us bitter old players with all of our grudges.
New leaders with drive with old player advisors = excitement
Kind words for us bitter oldfags there, but progress is progress. Eventually the training wheels have to come off 🙂
Eventually most of the old players leave. What does that leave us if we haven't gotten new players to take their place? The movement to new players fights stagnation. Sure new players might not be the best players for the job, but fighting stagnation is one of the most important things at this point.