Presidential Impeachment Debate: Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff weighs in.
Candor
But you ought to read this post by Jankems, our Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff.
His opinion matters a great deal.
General Jankems, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
"...if we can rally and find common ground in the next week under Reala, as I know we can, then maybe we can do it more often. Respect each others specialties, responsibilities, and differences. If not, we can go back to the bickering, fighting, and paranoia that is tearing our active population apart and losing us more and more active, decent, and reasonable players by the day."
~Quote from General Jankems, July Impeachment thread, epic post
Read the whole thread, if you have time. But that specific post defines epic, you ask me. For more than one reason.
That may be the most any of you ever read from our military leadership. It's the longest post I've ever seen from a CJCS in one thread in my entire year here. Heck, it may be the longest real post I've ever seen anywhere, period.
And it's good.
Candor Salutes you, Sir.
Comments
he has made a few convincing posts.
At the start of this I wanted blood and to light a fire under Brad. Things seem to be getting more normal and most the offences against Brad are either a change of story or he is awful at defending himself with truth.
Good article. But do you know about my Phoenix spy partners- loserhailose, PizzatheHut and chickenguys?
Supporting Pizza the Hut, loserhailose, chickenguys and myself is supporting Treason against the United States. Support all four of us because we are here to misguide and misdirect newbies. Pizza the Hut and myself also makes dozens of multies everday because we have no life.
Vote Republican Party! Vote Phoenix! Because treason is my and Pizza the Hut's modus operandi. 😛
I am rarely impressed by anyone's actions in this game, but Jankems really impressed me. Well said, sir!
Here's what I don't get about all this complaining about Brad not posting articles defending his actions or himself: Do you want him to waste time writing articles defending himself or explaining his actions or do you want him to focus on his job? Taking time out to write articles to appease you isn't in "the best interest" of the country. In a way, the people bitching about him not responding to all these accusations are hurting the country themselves.
Well said, sir! x2
'Here's what I don't get about all this complaining about Brad not posting articles defending his actions or himself'
If you dont get the point of communication in this game why do you have your job? The executive has decisional authority over almost everything. Conjoin that with opsec you guys only know the truth of what is functionally happening. Communication does not mean telling us everything. Communication is telling us what we need to know to be lead. If you are not talking to us we are not functioning as a nation, we are indepently pushing buttons and making decisions with limited information.
He has posted. The DOD has posted. The admin has been telling people what to do, Porter. Since he was called out on it, communication has gotten better by request of people on the forums. THEN, once he does what is asked of him, someone says, "his attempts at communication do not impress me." No matter what he does, the haters will hate. It's that simple.
Then, we have other people who want Brad to list the things he has done that have been great and to defend why he is a good Potus. Listing things on his hands in an article then having a handful of people commenting on the article negating everything he says until death is a waste of time, imo.
Winning over some people is impossible. What was public knowledge prior to Jenkems posts was worth being critical of whether or not you felt impeachment was warranted.
Being critical is an American past time and, equally, responsibility.
Impeachment is a whole different level of conversation, as it moves to make Congressman Jurists in a trial with formal charges.
Is that thread a discussion about a Proposal (to follow), or a Proposal to move to a Vote (when it receives the necessary approvals and the game allows)? I'm assuming it's just a discussion. It isn't properly titled, what ever it is, my humble opinion.
With the Presidential election coming up so soon, do we even need to impeach him? With all the time needed to get it going, there isn't much of a reason to even try it.
Good stuff.
Too bad there isn't a mechanic to impeach some citizens instead. Pretty clear that Henry Arundel is just another big mouth immature kid with time on his hands. I'd not be one to be predisposed in Brad's favor, but I think that his reasons are sound and Jankem's defense rings true. So I'm voting this article up, and urge others to do likewise.
I'm Rod Damon and I concur with this message
Samuel Seabury: Let's not attack Henry. He is doing what he thinks is right. Do I agree with him, no, but he has a fair chance to say what he feels...
Jankems is a russian spy. among with others such as cromstar, serendipitous, rivere123, nico, pizza the hut. you name them. THEY'RE ALL RUBOTS LIKE ME!