PEACE Tactics
•
by Dczip
It has been seen in many battles that if PEACE (mainly Indo) is about to lose one of the battles that they started, that they will retreat instead of them losing. Thats just part of the game. But then they will just start a new battle (with their unlimited gold that they get "legally" from the game.) This means that they are exploiting a loop hole in the game, which the ADMINS went back on their word saying they would do something about it. Each time they do this, they slap the face of the country that is protecting their region, as when PEACE does this, they know most 2 clicking citizens have used up their fights, so PEACE can get a better advantage on taking out the wall.
I know that most US citizens are tired of PEACE exploiting this condition, and it is even part of the reason that the US President, HarrisonRichardson, was temp banned during a big war day a few days ago.
If the ADMINS are reading this (and I know they might be) lets try and fix this exploit, cause I would hate to see the day that the US is taken over and all the active people from the US stop playing. It has already semi-happened with Romania.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
First and Voted
Agreed, entirely.
Tired of that broken mechanic as well
Yes, it is incredibly cheap to allow a country to indefinitely continue attacking so long as it's attacking somewhere.
Broken mechanics should be fixed ASAP, not months down the road. It's better to patch it now and deal with the immediate problem (which means that they buy themselves time to come up with a proper solution), than to leave it in place and let countries continue to abuse it while they try to come up with the best solution they can.
The perfect is the enemy of the good. The admins should get something in place to close this loophole now, not wait until they have everything just right, be it months from now.
USA have 16 ally, PEACE have 9 ally. Blocking PEACE countries with ally. Can not? It's your problem. Glorious nation, lol.
God bless Amerika, ok 🙂
Stop crying, go fight with us.
This is not true.
There are many wars we used on purpose to draw damage from you. And thus "retreated" from them even though it was our goal from the begining.
You just had to check our newspaper, the orders were always "do not fight yet".
Fixing that loop holes would mean you can attack only one region at a time otherwise nothing prevents you from making other attacks before one is finished. Which is not a good thing.
pffft the whining has already started
game mechanics works this way. Its not an "exploit". Every game has its mechanics. Learn to use it and use it to your benefit.
Just because you (and your leaders) don't have the slightest clue of how it works, doesn't mean it's unfair.
it's easy to say that the indo's have unlimited gold making loophole hack technics🙂 but you know what? the spanish have a lot of gold too🙂
faiiiil
sounds like alot of peace members think this is not a fair argument? OK so lets clear one thing how you are winning is legal,not cheating,and is the game mechanics. With that said is it right? is it realistic? is it fun? i think i can see three NOs. now you can flame me all day and all night but it dosent change the fact that the mechanics are retarded...nobody said you arnt doing a good job of using them because well you are..and yes we had our opportunity and failed to take them but that is another argument. So the point of this story is that the erep game mechanics are NOT realistic and give a 80% /20% ratio to the attacker IMO. as in as long as you attack two states at the same time you can retreat one thus not being considered by game mechanic law a loser..and with the defenders assets poured into winning that one battle they inevitably lose the second...and you add up the unbalanced assets,tanks.gold and the like that 80%/20% ratio is even worse for your average defender. not just eusa but anybody fighting three fronts at the same time.
so yes you are good at using game mechanics PEACE and yes your laying a beat down...but remember that you had an 80/20 ratio atleast in my opinion out of the gate. and that the game mechanics ARE NOT REALISTIC.
even if you want to keep the retreat feature why cant we attack another region from another region as a separate battle? because that's realistic right? when we cant do this..well theres no incentive for you to worry about well anything really..and to the ereps should make changes according.
thanks for bashing because i know you will silly PEACE members 😛
no peace with PEACE GC
You'd think that it'd make sense that if a nation retreated from attacking a specific region, they wouldn't be able to attack it again for 24 hours. The 24 hours would count as "rest and recoup" time for the losing (retreating) attacker. Ah well...
Well we'll see what happens if the US is taken over and all the big players drop out of the game.
IMO we might get beaten back into FL and NJ maybe another state or two..but i think PEACE can reach every state without needing NJ or FL...didnt look at the map to check though.
another interesting note as we know Portuguese gave Georgia back to us in order to prevent Spain from directly aiding us. meaning Louisiana might be important... otherwise they would need to attack over oceans right? thus not using the same fronts they are now. and the cost of that attack would be massive and with only one or two regions they wont be able to siphon nearly as much power as they do now with three fronts.. meaning we will more than likely defend much better...however the downside is that they can batter those regions with some of the most experienced erep players in the eworld.