Vote with your heart!
Alphabethis
I'm rather indulgent, empathic, understanding, with people which do mistakes, with people full of defects. We are united more in our very imperfections than in our best abilities.
For me, vote buying (either for newspaper or for elections) is not the greatest defect in life. As a matter of fact, vote buying is just a special case of bulk-voting, or mass-voting, where the mass is gathered along MONEY.
Other case of bulk-voting is the party-bulk-voting. This is a specialty of TUP. I bring you the latest and shameful case of bulk-voting:
- Sexagenarian wrote a thoughtful article:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/some-things-you-might-want-to-take-into-account-when-voting-2125726/1/20
which was promptly bulk-voted by:
- Talon, http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/some-things-you-might-want-to-take-into-account-when-voting1-2125733/1/20
It's not uncommon to see TUP behave as a block of bulk-voting in newspapers and elections, and that's one of their many faults.
Yes, TUP is somewhat soulless, a machinery that comprising 25% of the voters gets 33% of the votes election after election.
They could be called properly THE NEGATIVE party or the NO-PARTY:
- they said (in forum) no to a real budget
- they said no to NHS, nor BEF, nor a national army
- they said no to rational discussion ( Talon's article of spiderman
was a milestone of his statesmanship)
- they said no to rational foreign policy ( France no way, Poland of course,
what about the rest? do you know at all what a foreing policy is? )
- they said no to a discussed politics
- their common practise in comments is direct insult and they seldom
discuss the core of the points
- they said no to a procedured government (including citizenships).
So, when Sir Nick, Richard Feist or anyone else search for bulk-voting
"using money" instead the brute force of a party, I remind myself we
all have defects, and some have the Power and the Corruption.
So vote with your heart and remember we're all humans and have mercy (
but no votes) to the corrupts.
Comments
Another article against TUP. Still curious why this is needed. Other parties together have big majority. Are you not able to change things when they are needed? Or do you not get majority for ideas?
I assume you are for the yes party? Why so negative then and blaming TUP?
NHS and BEF are still existing thanks to privatizing. Our nation have a low income and our MPP's cost as almost much as we earn. We exist as independent nation thanks to good foreign affairs. Yes we do!
Is your e-Life only dedicated to share your hate against a party ?
You only protest and propose nothing as solution. Try be constructive but I'm thinking that it is too hard for you
This is another hateful and useless article published by alphabetis.
Actually, the main reason why the TUP keep saying no is because your policies and ideas tend to be seriously flawed... It is not only the TUP who were shaking their heads....
Likewise, please don't soil the rest of the UKPP based upon Sir Nick's decision to buy votes for his article etc... Quite a few are equally narked about that too...
I lol'd once again.
We can't afford a NHS nor justify having it. It served its purpose. (TUP sent it into private hands)
BEF is still going albeit slightly different from before.
Peace with France? If your such a whizz with FA, then surely you can see by Frances actions alone in regard to us that peace with them won't be forth coming any time soon.
Understand the game, understand the players and you might start making sensible suggestions that people actually take aboard.
V+S, ould comment but the screen hurts my eyes...man flu
hugh, very likely , you have unsubscribed!
It's a shame that all the UKRP members joined TUP and turned it into UKRP.