Terra and Japan: A Faded Bond?
![Japan](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/Japan.png)
Sophia Forrester
It would not be wrong to say that eJapan was lucky to be invited to the Terra alliance. At the time, we had been allied with the US, Canada, Australia and Ireland in the "Brolliance." Originally an informal club of to the US and Canada, the "bros" who fought off the PEACE GC invasion together, the Brolliance was expanded in 2010 to include three more English-speaking countries.
But by early 2011, the brotherhood was showing its age. PANAM was the new hope sought by the USA: An alliance with the former Phoenix nations of Brazil and Argentina. Of the nations who had sworn brotherhood, only Canada and Japan were invited to join. Japan was by far the weakest of the founding members, although we had significantly gained strength compared to the prior year. It was the goodwill of the USA that had made us the only founding member from outside the Americas.
PANAM soon became Terra, and with the addition of France and Germany, threw down the gauntlet to ONE: We intended to protect those two oft-conquered nations, habitual targets of powerhouses Spain and Poland, respectively. Even after ONE emerged as the leading alliance of the New World, Terra continued to fight for freedom. Unfortunately, Japan would soon begin to lose our sense of connection.
The trigger was a political dispute in North Korea. The Chinese ATO unit Volunteer Army and the native, English-speaking City Party had collaborated to push out the longstanding Russian PTO -- but the Chinese had begun to dominate, insisting on a more significant role. The two groups had agreed to take turns as Country President, but the Chinese broke this deal, unexpectedly calling the City Party a subversive group. Furthermore, when Japan's diplomats tried to intervene on behalf of the City Party, the Chinese exploited an open training war to invade, claiming that Japan had been corrupted by City Party influence.
Within a week, China had pushed Japan down to one region. Our Terra allies, pushed hard by ONE, were not able to intervene. But as sudden as it had begun, the war ended. It had either been a misunderstanding (as the Chinese now claimed), or a brutal attempt to show force before drawing back to establish an illusory peace.
It seemed that most of Terra believed the illusion, if that is what it was. China was an important member of EDEN, which was also under attack by ONE's onslaught. With the enemy at the gates, it was easier for them to trust China than to acknowledge the true situation. Indeed, most of our allies were not aware until quite late that the Chinese attacks had not been part of the training war. China kept Kyushu and Chugoku, but offered a token rent of Gold, more or less "take it or leave it."
And so, we drifted away. Our leaders saw China as an enemy, but our allies' leadership did not take this seriously. To them, ONE was the enemy, a clear and present danger that kept most of them constantly under attack. China was therefore a needed ally, and if they wanted to sweep their attack on Japan under the rug, Terra would not gainsay it.
Trust faded on both sides. We had faced a serious attack for the first time, and been ignored. But to our allies, the continued attacks of ONE seemed like the only true serious threat. It's easy to forget, now that the war is again confined to Europe, how America was wiped by the assault of five strong enemies at the same time. When our government protested China's defensive withdrawal from Kyushu, saying they intended to use us as a "meatshield," we must have seemed ungrateful to allies who had already been under attack from the war's start. The danger to a "meatshield" would have been far less than they'd faced from day one.
The irony is that Terra's success remains very much in our national interest. The dominance of ONE's alliance of the heavy hitters cannot be good for smaller countries. Terra gave us an opportunity to shift the balance of power, building an idealistic new alliance from the ground up. If we had remained engaged, the hasty move to eject us would have been unthinkable -- but engagement with an alliance is a two-way street. The truth is that both Japan and Terra lost an opportunity in July, and the next chance to change the New World may be a long time coming.
Comments
We joined TERRA out of a "tag-along" relationship with the USA. For some time we've followed them and collaborated with their efforts, even though eJapan has been divided on our ties with it.
Personally, I'm glad the strings are cut and we can stop being a pilotfish to the States and start being our own country. Some of USA's enemies - past and present - have been downright cool with us, and I've been exhausted with hating some of them just because we were told to by our "big brother".
Alot of Americans dont read the Japanese media either because it is dead or because they expect it to be in a language they doo not understand, you should consider posting a few articles in the U.S. and see what kind of response you get.
Bucephalus92, thank you for the suggestion! It is a good idea.
Kaige, I agree that we should not decide our foreign policyas a client of a single larger nation. However, it would be a mistake to lose all of our ties to Terra, just to get out of the USA's shadow. I'd favor alliance with France or Germany, since both are in harms way at the moment. Another alliance with the USA is less likely to be accepted in the short-term, with how carefully they have been stepping around the Chinese of late.
Good article. Ummm france voted us out of Terra. I doubt they would want to ally with us.
James?
Ecka, it would be a bit defeatist to simply assume that the answer is no without an effort to find out, Even if they DO say no, by making the attempt we would demonstrate that we intend to regain their trust. That counts for something.
voted
I can ask the US what they think, but I was pretty happy we could do better these days without them. I just hope we can talk to them as equals or friends.
Brasil Rules '-'
eChina's "problem" with eJapan stemmed largely from the fact that most of eJapan's active citizens happened to be former eNorth Koreans/City Party. Not necessarily a condemnation, but those who think eChinese government is dumb enough to pretend the eNorth Koreans who fled to eJapan are somehow different than they were in eNorth Korea are probably also the same kind of people who think the eChinese should be "grateful" for the time when eJapan helped "liberate" them.
eJapan in Brolliance turned out to more or less be an eUSA puppet state situation, PANAM->Terra membership was a little less so, I think, but more of a "meatshield" situation to cover eUSA's west flank. It is, as Kaigefoh states, nice that eJapan has broken out of that orbit (lol more like thrown out) and perhaps adopted (dare I say!) a more "unaligned" position...?
We should, of course, try to cultivate friendships/useful MPPs with nations that are positively disposed towards us. Considering this, I wouldn't rely much on eFrance, since usually voting a country out of an alliance indicates they are not interested in pursuing further friendly relations.
One of the government's top priorities should be to make sure that eJapan's voice is heard (regular articles, regular presence in IRC channels, etc.) in eChina/eROC, eKoreas, and eUSA. Quite a little language challenge....
Our government at the time was mostly players who had been eJapanese for a while, and it was more or less pointless for China to attack us in order to pursue a grudge. The cultural illiteracy of certain specific players did not help, but I can't condone the Chinese for pressing forward on a war just in order to further a grudge against a group of players who'd asked them to keep their word in an undiplomatic way.
I'm sure the bizarre decision to mpp with eUK over eCanada had something to do with getting kicked out of Terra also.
We always had MPP with eUK little before they left Terra due to eCanada. Probably why we stuck with eUK MPP over eCanada.