Join the new world

It's a garmr day today.

And tomorrow too*

month*

Fair enough.

oh damm you as moha, let's fly in some japanese 😉

Good luck from eBE 🙂

If no distinction between ministers and state secretaries is made, for the forum medals I will consider serving a full term working for a ministry as 0.5 state secretary terms and 0.5 minister terms. I've just tested the medal calculator and it clearly allows for non-integer input, so this shouldn't pose any problems.

However, if you have more than 10 terms, you cannot enter the part behind the decimal point. In that case, I will still do the calculation based on such a mixed term.

And of course, if at some point the decision is made that based on the work done there is a difference between the members of a certain ministry, then I'm sure Garmr will re-introduce the terms state secretary and minister for that specific ministry. 😉

Oh yeah absolutely, if there is a clear distinction between people and the time they spend in the ministry then there's reason to deputize someone.

Garmr, can you also introduce Mazzy Cat?
I'm sure many of us do not know her.

I hope she won't be part of another gov (which would be a violation of lawbook III.1.4)

It's a joke, she won't have cabinet access.

As MoF (MoC is already taken so you're term won't fit) is undecided yet; What are the options as to me that will make a large, if not the largest, difference.

Strong team, good luck 🙂

[removed]

You know you are required by law to appoint a Minister of Defence and a Minister of Finance? I haven't seen either of them...

Minster of Defence is Minister of War (Headed possibly by Maarten) 😉 and Minister of Coin is Minister of Finance (which he stated there will be appointment soon)

Then I didn't read correctly that there are no ministers 😛

Yeah War = Defense and Coin = Finance. Everyone is a minister.

RikW has a good point:

"Article 2 – Organization of Ministries
1. A Ministry is headed by a Minister, supported by one or more State Secretaries, if deemed necessary.
2. The Country President has the right to create and abolish Ministries at will.
3. The Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Defense must always exist and must always have an appointed Minister."

Not making the distinction between ministers and state secretaries is opposed to what this lawbook article says.

'A' minister is not 'one' minister. Everyone can be a minister.

That sounds like you're trying to exploit a loophole in the law. I'm not sure congress will agree with this interpretation...

They ultimately have to decide whether "a minister" is "one minister", or "at least one minister".

I am the kingpin of exploiting loopholes in the law. It's hardly an offense seeing some other people just openly defy following them. And it's not up to congress how to interpret a law, we had a now-abolished senate for that. They can only do a NC vote.

Voted. Good looking cabinet IMO. 🙂

Good luck! 😃

Good luck!

Ohai 0.0

Meow! ♥

Let's hope this ain't going to happen. it's clear to see you want our MoF Weekstrom out of the way, so you can go back to spend whatever you like, what happened in the old days when you tried to lead the country. Most folks here don't even know that you where implicated in the great hest as well, when eNL lost all it's gold, cc, and weaponstock. 🙁 I sure hope it won't come to this again, but by putting Weekstrom aside, the man that has made our finances healthy again, after last year the I&W MoF Auggustus trow all our cc overboard, you are making our state coffers vulnareble to exactly that. I say NO, not again!!!

Since PL will sign a treaty with me, and not with you, I am pretty sure my cabinet will earn a lot more CC than yours.

that is complete bs, and you know it. I had a very nice conversation with PL, and they assured me that if we want, a new treaty can be signed once I amin office.

Then why did the PL CP publicly said he wouldn't, after you said this same statement in an earlier article?

PL will talk to me 🙂

Further proof: http://tinyurl.com/6xmou7m

But really it's a bullshit story you try to spin here, we made an attempt to RW a region which was the only time PL really had to give an effort, and we lost in the final round in the final 5 minutes. I didn't hear you complain at all at the time.

Also, your cabinet saw fit to grant PG with thousands of CC yet the subsidies for young players fell outside the budget. Sounds like you really got finances healthy right there.

and there's more bs. the cc is still there, ready to use in case of need.

That wasn't the point, my point was that new players couldn't even get their subsidies while that's their right by law.

You also have a good point. Ever since I notified Weekstrom that the subsidies were
a: out-dated since they stimulate the wrong kind of actions
b: out-dated because CC has become much more valuable
they have been suspended, but still have not been removed from the lawbook and been replaced by more useful plans.

So both congress and the MoF apparently keep forgetting/postponing this... Maybe I should candidate for MoF and make sure that this gets done?

It's not a MoF job, as long as it's in the lawbook it should be followed. That's what I've been saying for over a month, but people just walk all over the laws if it's convenient to them. Follow them or change them are the only two options.

, but people just walk all over the laws if it's convenient to them | it is funny that especially you are the one who say's this |I am the kingpin of exploiting loopholes in the law. It's hardly an offense seeing some other people just openly defy following them. And it's not up to congress how to interpret a law,| and now you are saying that the law book should be followed

There is no Val3s in the cabinet

There was no Val3s in my inbox seducing me for a cabinet position 🙁

There was no time so Val3s could send you a pm because of his magnificent trip in Öustria

Why, still there? Banged any broads?