Fighting with Q7 or 3 Q5 weapons?
J Seemore
One Q7 tank gives us 200% more damage and 10 hits. If we compare the efficiency of Q7 and Q5 weapons we will see that 3 Q5 = 1 Q7, but the price for 3 Q5 is 8,5-9 cc and it is around 2,5 times cheeper than one Q7.
What is the disadvantage of using 3 Q5 instead of 1 Q7?
3 Q5 = 15 hits => We will need 50 energy points (2 cc) more and we will spend 5 experience points extra when we use Q5 weapons. So if we want to use 100 Q7 that will cost us 1000 exp. points, 10K energy and 2500 cc. Same damage made by Q5 weapons will cost 1500 exp. points, 15K energy and 850-900 cc. 5k energy = 200 cc, but 500 prestige points will give us some extra enery and I do not believe that will be necessary to buy so much food.
A week ago the price/efficiency for Q7 and 3 Q5 were approximately 1:1. Now it is 2,5 times cheeper to fight with Q5 and it is going to be 3 times.
You can deal 3xDamage when using Q5 weapons for the price of 1 Q7.
One Q7
Q5 weapons
Would you keep your experience? Would you save your energy? If you do - then take the Q7!
*Dear players from 1-st and 2-nd Division (like me), we must fight with Bazookas, rockets and bombs only.
Shout the article if you like it:
http://www.erepublik.com/bg/article/fighting-with-q7-or-3-q5-weapons--2356650/1/20
Comments
Voted,
Weapon prices have gone crazy!
skanky girls don't get you my vote, sorry.
skanky girls need love too
Binda, don't be so cruel - these girls are kitties! Don't you like kitties, couse I like them much 😉
No, they're porn stars, only a step away from being naked. I understand that this appeals to horny boys who don't have much experience and/or have no current relationship with a real girl, but it really shouldn't be posted here. There are kids who play this game mate.
Yes, they are porn stars. At least 80% of the players here are men. If you care about the children... there are not so young boys and girls here. I will give 3Q7 tanks to every single guy, who said that he doesn't like to see these pictures here.
My point is that even if guys do like it, and I'm sure most do, it's not really good to post this kind of thing where there may be kids watching.
Kids have to be at least 14 to play this game according to the rules, this is perfectly legal material for 14-17 year olds... These girls aren't naked.. You see more revealing than than in M15+ movies..
I wouldn't want a 14 year old to see those pics tbh. Would you like your 14 year old sister or daughter to look at that?
binda
I was looking for worse images/vid than that when I was 13
I respect your position, Binda, but I hope that all players are older than 17-18 y. Give to 12 y old child a PC, Netbook, phone, touchpad, or whatever device you know conected to the internet and few days later take a look to the history menu. Then we shall speak again about these pictures.
I don't think you understand my point here. Not all kids will go looking for this sort of thing online and you are removing their choice by posting it here. This is a game played by kids as well as adults. We all understand that rude pics are available online, but nobody will go looking for them on this type of game. If people want this kind of thing they certainly know how to look for them.
voted hard, its something we need to start considering if these prices keep up
v!
o7... Extra Prestige Points for the chicks! 😛
Ugh, I don't like seeing skanky girls in here!
Successfully transferred 3 item(s) to ChosenR.
[removed]
There was a time when this game actually had a theme, a plot, a narrative... way back then, from beta till about 8 months ago pics of girls were just background. Binda used to write about politics, battle plans, strategy.... the very things that no longer count in this game. Weaps prices seem manipulated... hmmmmm, does that sell moar gold?
Honestly, her point is well taken in terms of young people and all people when it comes to combining violence and weapons with sexy pics of women. Models or not, they are women and as one myself, I think that the world has enough violence and does not need to associate the beauty of a women with a rocket launcher or auto weapon.
Maybe they are just enjoying their second amendment rights: 'Every citizen has the right to bear arms..' Self defense.. The only reason why were are free, is because of the U.S second amendment... And that's the truth of the matter... Everyone knows that it's almost impossible to enslave an armed population, and that is the truth of the matter...
The TRUTH of the matter is that if bearing arms is the only reason the USA is free than the USA has big problems. BTW: the USA is not under threat of enslavement and never has been. Your response is naive pablum, especially considering the international nature of the game and that several of the weapons in the pictures are not legal for civilians to own in the USA. ALSO; how about addressing the use of sex and females to promote weapons and violence.
I'm pretty sure that in Australia, we do not have the right to bear arms. Not that this has anything to do with pictures objectifying women..
Thanks for this comment! I sent you 3 Q7 tanks.
[removed]
Naive, you're joking right? It's a fact in history that armed populations are almost impossible to subdue. Did you know that's the reason why Hitler didn't invade Switzerland? His generals calculated that the price would be too high, because every man, women and child had the right to bear arms in Switzerland. And that's why the founding fathers put in the law to arm the citizens, in the event that if the government became tyrannical, the citizens would have a chance to defend themselves.. American could only as Thomas Jefferson rightly stated be taken from within... Certain powers would love to disarm the population... You should educate yourself a bit and stop listening to the mainstream media who are funded by the billionaires who buy off politicians and want the public disarmed.. They also totally don't mention the stories of self defense, and how all the armed cities have lower crime rates.. Highest crime rates are Chicago and New York, because all the criminals are armed and the citizens are not... Look it up... Naive lol... funny...
I realize you may not grasp that this is not a game about America, but it isn't. ALSO, outside of this game, no one, outside of terrorists (many of whom are native Americans, often mentally ill), are attacking America. Please cite three incidents where a armed citizen has stopped a terrorist; foreign or domestic.
"how about addressing the use of sex and females to promote weapons and violence"
Animis you have nice avatar, I like it.
haha.... you know what is pretty funny; ifr you take off the funny maple leaves, you end up with Disney's Snow White and her pretty gun.
Thanks, by the way good article.
I feel the the wigbot has played a major role in creating an artificial q7 shortage to sell moar gold.
good analysis of DMG and cost.
Are you for real? Alternative media always reports how criminals tried to rob a shop, and an old man with conceal carry make them run away. Or break ins, and attempted rapes... Look at the statistics... Texas and Arizona has some of the lowest crime rates those are the most heavily armed states, Chicago, New York highest crime rates strictest gun laws.. It's common sense... And yes part of the reason you are free today is because of the U.S second amendment. No nation in the history of mankind was set free as America was.. You would be a total slave with no rights under a monarchy if it wasn't for the second amendment.. As I said, every Military commander knows that attacking an armed population is certain defeat, and history has proven that time and time again.... 🙂
All I am seeing here, is some girls in bikinis enjoying their second amendment rights... It's got my tick of approval at least 🙂
We're in Australia mate. We don't have those same rights here.
We do, because when the U.S became a republic and man for the first time was set free, the idea spread around the world, and other nations followed, monarchies had to give the people freedom and land owner ship etc... That's the truth.... And the 2nd amendment was one of the main reasons for that... So yes you do have the rights they were awarded by setting America free... 🙂
Gun laws are much tighter here. We don't have the right to bear arms. We need to earn the licence for it instead.
That was a mistake, no government likes armed citizens.. Because it takes away the option of enslaving and oppressing them later on down the track... When I said they were enjoying their second amendment rights, I was referring to the girls in the pics, they are obviously not Aussies... So they are probably American chicks just enjoying their 2nd amendment rights..
There is no girl who will pose for slutty pics like that unless she's paid well. If you want to look at those types of pics I'm sure there are many places that cater to it. eRep shouldn't be one of those places or guys would be saying "I really want to look at slutty chicks so I'll go to eRepublik.."
what!
then fuck this, I'm outta here
Funny how much you have diluted your rhetoric; no longer is it "The only reason why were are free, is because of the U.S second amendment", now it is "part of the reason you are free today is because of the U.S second amendment". and you are citing the revolutionary war, which was fought with muskets on both sides. BTW: Naive = using false, uniformed, made up and undefined crime statistics to back a conclusion which you appear to have a bias towards proving true, no matter what the actual real truth is. If left up to you would you say that all crime in the US is because citizens don't have enough guns? LOL'ing hard. What grade are you in?, because no fully informed adult buys that crap.
Is this a joke?? Go look up the stats... lol... You seriously need to get educated... It's available to anyone who wants to look.... It's not the point whether is it muskets or not... It's not even the point for them to be used.. It's the fact that criminals know that you got a weapon in the closet they don't brake into your house... That's why the crime rates are lower in armed citizen states in the US... Made up stats.... lol
http://americangunfacts.com/
http://pjmedia.com/blog/fbi-crime-stats-show-an-armed-public-is-a-safer-public/
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2013/08/30/harvard-gun-study-no-decrease-in-violence-with-ban/
http://www.policymic.com/articles/22835/gun-control-facts-detroit-crime-rate-is-the-result-of-gun-control
BTW: with all this gun talk, could you please address the price of Q7s
I could post just as many biased articles that prove the opposite, and others that cite stats claiming it makes no difference. Other studies have shown that the availability of firearms increases the chances of domestic violence, suicide and accidental gun shots. BTW: Do you know where do most bank robberies occur? Are guns involved? Do you know what the most common crime in America is? With just about one gun for every man, woman and child in America in private hands, how do the statistics for gun related violent crime in America compare to other nations, or let's say Western Europe?
By the way, when you try to to claim someone is not educated, or in some manner lacking your superior intellectual skills, you should attempt to spell simple words correctly; BREAK. It makes a better impression to at least know how to spell.
So take away the guns, so you leave the criminals armed? Okay, you do that, you hand in your guns.. Then go live in New York and Chicago where the criminals are armed and the citizens are not... Look at Switzerland's crime rates too while you are at it.. Look at the crime figures of UK per capita compared to armed states of the U.S.
Btw when I said uneducated, I wasn't talking about in general, I was talking about this subject. But now that you mentioned it you spelt 'more' wrong above ''.. Animiis 'hmmmmm, does that sell moar gold?'' Also a grammar mistake here: ''Please cite three incidents where a armed citizen...'' Should be ''an armed citizen...''
Animis quote: ''think that the world has enough violence and does not need to associate the beauty of a women..'' Should be ''beauty of a womAn''
Only voted cuz of the women pics
people crying about gun prices, learn to do grade 3 maths to figure out why...its not hard, but apparently it is for you people who cant do simple arithmetic and multiplication.
Just take the pics down mate and I'll give you my vote. My girlfriend almost broke up with me because I was looking at this article. I can see why women would be offended by this and there is no point to them
no way did your girlfriend almost break up with you because of a picture on in the internet which you did not intend to view
if she did then you need to get yourself a new one because she is either overly attached or jealous, neither of which is good
Successfully transferred 3 item(s) to lord braddy.
In few hours this article will be in the history.
And btw info war the only reason the U.S has a gun right law is because they originally had no military thus it was necessary for defence. And the American democratic system was actually based on the English monarchy (which already had set up a early voting system) so don't give me "leaders of the free world" crap
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” – Thomas Jefferson
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.” – George Washington
“Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence. The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference.” -- George Washington
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive." - Noah Webster
"One of the ordinary modes, by which tyrants accomplish their purposes without resistance, is, by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms." - Constitutional scholar and Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story
You're also wrong about U.S constitution not setting man free for the first time in history.. Totally wrong... They adopted British law that is true, but they were still slaves under the monarch and that was the whole purpose of the war of independence, to break away from British oppression and unjust laws.
So it's a good thing that America is the fourth most dangerous country? And you say America was free now? What about the partite, the riots against women's independents, the slaughtering of the red Indians. Is that really a "freedom" to be proud of? The west minster system is a much. Better system of government