These are challenging times.
scrabman
These are challenging times.
I believe that Uncle Sam, his cabinet, Congress and, most importantly, each and every eUSA citizen would agree with that statement as being fact. We are currently faced with a choice that may have been inconceivable to many even six days ago ... and challenging times require that we seek steady, intentional leadership.
There is a growing call for change in leadership and in tactics during this challenge and those voices are valued. As I mentioned in my last article - congratulating Uncle Sam for his electoral victory just six days ago - every vote I received and every vote received by my colleagues in the opposition represents a voice of encouragement for the varied visions and goals we represented.
It is inevitable that my actions will receive increased scrutiny with the current Articles of Impeachment being brought forth - in which I took no part. This is due to the fact that I was the runner up in the electoral contest for President. However, it is imperative that I impress upon all my colleagues in Congress to join me in fulfilling their duty to weigh the accusations against the evidence, assess whether the allegations warrant the consequence, and the critical step, listen to your constituents prior to exercising your vote.
In short, while I fully recognize the possible implications of the passage of the Articles of Impeachment as they relate to my future; I will not apologize for receiving the votes I did, as each one represents the distinct voice of an eUSA citizen seeking progress; and I will not shirk my foremost responsibility to the West Virginians I represent, for personal gain. I will also be wary of Uncle Sam's skillful ability to talk his way out of sticky situations by promising the sun, the moon, and the stars while delivering nothing of substance.
Regardless of the outcome, it is critical that you are aware that I am currently working with the administration and a formidable team of Foreign Policy, Military and Economics advisers to finalize immediate and long range planning to strengthen our nations borders, proactively plan counteroffensive maneuvers, and increase the stability of our logistics and supply in the event of an invasion. I will not be distracted from protecting and strengthening the eUSA and this team did not appear overnight but were my closest helpers during the campaign for President last month and have been helping me to prepare for the next go round. I lead by delegation and will make sure that the right people are in the right positions so that we do not fail in crucial areas such as foreign policy, fiscal accountability, or communication with the Congress. This is how I led the USWP and it would be the way that I would lead the country.
Finally, if the voices for change do prevail, you may expect a leader that will leverage the incredible knowledge of the cabinet, the Congress, and the American citizens to make information-based (rather than unilateral) decisions to seek for public benefit rather for than personal gain, and most of all to provide steady intentional leadership for the remainder of this term. If selected to serve as President I will do so to the best of my ability whether it is now or during the next election. The war isn't the only issue that must be addressed. We also must address our depleted treasury and our critically low supply of iron but those will be topics for another day.
I hope that, one way or another, we can address these problems as a nation and become stronger from the experience. And perhaps we can learn from our past mistakes rather than cyclically repeating them.
Comments
Glad to see that you still do something other than just irrational bannings.
Sorry for your luck Emerick. How is the UK?
Luck had nothing to do with it, unless I just happened to be the guy you and your puppy chose to be an example for those who have the gull to express themselves.
The UK is fine. They're allowed the right to free speech. We should try that out. Again. Also they think that you're a Nazi.
Speaking of which, Justin tells me that you guys almost banned him for saying that my permaban was uncalled for. I sure hope that you make the US that crazy if you become president. We haven't had a president call people traitors for speaking their mind in almost 3 whole months, I'm jonesing.
That is a hilarious picture. Sadly, that's the only positive thing I can think of to say.
Hmmm... it's hard to see from this article where you stand on some of the issues; but I know that you have what is best for the country in mind. Keep focuesd on the country instead of the "shit" of the day like some congressmen.
Emerick brings up a good point. I'm not afraid of leadership or being unpopular.
When Emerick kept being a petulant child in the eUSA Forums I banned him. When he came back and started up again, I banned him again. Third time was a charm but the last time it wasn't me who banned him ... I just got to cast a vote on his PermaBan and I was glad to do it because I care about the eUSA Forums just like I care about the direction that the eUSA is heading under Uncle Sam.
I'm not alone in either of these concerns. While I'm sure that Emerick looks at himself as a Christ-like martyr ... many others thought he got what he deserved. While Sam thinks of himself as a great leader ... many more think that he is not. The question is what to do about it and my answer is that I am ready to take over whether it is now or next month.
I said this on another article but it's the truth. As the old saying goes "the buck stops here". Not saying the Sam is to blame but he is in charge and he as to take full responsibility for any failure/success, the same as any president has to do. If something bad happens,like what's happening now, get ready for some poo slinging right at you.
And as the other saying goes "with great power come great responsibility". Anyone with the guts to take on the role of president and not half-ass it is a great leader. I hope that if you ever become president you do as good of a job or if possible better than Sam.
You sir, are a class act. Much respect + Voted.
I have to say it's time to take a different tack.
In the last week, the Secretary of State, Quartermaster General, and Vice President have resigned.
What does that tell us about the wisdom of "staying the course"?
The current regime got us into this, we all had our fun, then all hell broke loose.
The chain of command broke down. The USNG is no longer getting orders. I asked my CO what to advise unit members (I'm the 1st Sgt of my platoon) and he told me to improvise, because orders aren't coming out anymore. Bad. News. We're fighting, and no one's in charge.
The Oaxaca resistance was totally disorganized, now 8 PEACE allies are looking at the lights of Nogales, Arizona.
One nominee for most disastrous strategic move ever in eRepublik history would have to be the attack on Southeast Mexico when the military was already overstretched and weapons were gone or outrageously overpriced days ago.
The icing on the cake is the President's decision, despite overwhelming public opinion, to immediately pay the UK 100 gold (without consulting anyone, btw) at the UK PM's insistence, in the hopes that the UK would sign an MPP with us. I still haven't seen the MPP happen. And if you look at the UK forums, you can get an idea of how many of them would want to support us if PEACE goes for Texas or California.
PEACE is at our border, and we need leadership that will communicate with the populace, the military, and foreign governments. The previous administration has done damage to the US that will take months to overcome, economically, militarily, and diplomatically.
We can't afford three more weeks of this.
"The Oaxaca resistance was totally disorganized, now 8 PEACE allies are looking at the lights of Nogales, Arizona."
One thing that PEACE has been consistent in is that it's never opened up a battle in a country's original region. I'm not saying that it would never happen, but it's a small possibility.
"PEACE never opened up a battle in a countries' original region"
Really.
Did Australia give most of its' territory to Indonesia voluntarily? How about Indonesia in India? I'd start on election bombs but there are too many to name.
Emerick, I'm sorry that you feel angry with Scrabman over some personal difficulty between the two of you in the past, but frankly, I don't feel your personal grievances add anything to this discussion. And you won't convince any halfway rational reader that PEACE isn't a danger to the US. If you have any doubt, just go on the forums. They're looking for the 1848 borders. That means ceding California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, and Texas to Mexico.
Nope.
I see no benefit in continuing to debate you Emerick. You're gone from the Forums by your choice in being crude, insulting, and trollish. If that makes me a bad person ... well ... so be it. You weren't banned for "free speech". You were banned for being an asshole. End of story.
As for the Sam story. I'm not going to lay out all of the answers that I think will save the country. I don't have access to the resources that Sam has as President ... but I know that Sam hasn't used diplomacy very well. This would be a great time to understand diplomacy and foreign policy. I have Inwegen as my campaign manager who has worked tirelessly with ATLANTIS, I have Ananias who understands fiscal policy very well and has been a great thinker in the eUSA, and I have others with suitable skills to address our current problems.
"You weren't banned for "free speech". You were banned for being an asshole."
Oh, ok. I was under the impression that saying anything, unless it puts people in immediate danger was free speech. Now I know that "being an asshole" is also a crime. Thank you for enlightening me.
Alright, I was wrong about India, but Peace didn't exist when Australia was taken over.
What I should have said was that it's highly unlikely that they will, because PEACE has never opened a battle in a large country's original regions. A rational person will recognize that Portugal has everything to lose if they activate the US's MPP's. They won't do it if they want this to be a successful campaign. PEACE is pretty occupied with Romania right now and, believe it or not, we're still in an alliance, and they're still treating us as allies, so they'll continue to protect us, even if some citizens want to berate them.
And I doubt those posts are by the Mexican or Portuguese president. If they are, then prove me wrong, but I'd guess that they're from angry citizens.
My issue with scrabman isn't personal, it's very public, and I think that it has plenty of relevance to the discussion. If you want to keep believing in him, go right ahead. I used to, too, but I changed my mind. If you ever decide that he's not worth your support, here's some advice- don't piss him off if he has any power.
Emerick: shut up. No one cares about your hurt feelings. I just want to hear what a potential president has to say about how to get us out of this.
This will be the last time I directly address you. You are an internet troll, and I know your reputation well, both from US and UK forums.
You're free to close yourself to alternatives, that's your prerogative.
Also,
"This will be the last time I directly address you."
Oh no he didn't.(;´Д`)
I think I might support an impeachment. Not because of anything Sam did (That's only a small fraction of it), but because I think you can get us out of this mess better.
@Wade: Agreed. We need some leadership now, in no small part because half the Administration has resigned, and no one is telling NG units what to do anymore.
Thumbs up on the article. Thumbs own on the troll who would not take the many friendly warnings that were provided at the forums.
Scrab was one vote on that decision, not the whole enchilada.
Emerick trolling here shows more of the same. I posted Emerick's permaban. I agreed with the vote to be rid of a forum troll who would not change his ways. We still wish Emerick the best here in the two click or wherever he may wish to go or to be.
Nice article. For those who want more specifics on what policy decisions a President Scrabman would make, I suggest you read his campaign literature...he is quite specific on several issues (fiscal policy, diplomacy, etc).
Are we better off with Uncle Sam making decisions unilaterally (and reckless decisions at that), or are we better off with scrab? I know my vote, and it's the same as it was 7 days ago.
If we unite behind bad decisions and poor leaders, how valuable is our unity? While I agree that unity is extremely important right now, we must also fill the leadership void in our country. We must unite behind strong leaders who seek the advice of knowledgable people to make informed decisions. This is something Uncle Sam has not done since he was re-elected.
Also, scrabman did not call for Sam's impeachment; he explicitly stated that he did not participate in this process. But you cannot expect him to remain silent when there is a very real possibility that he will assume the Presidency. We need to know that there won't be a leadership vacuum if Sam is ousted, and that's what this article was all about.
General, soldiering has one great trap: to be a good solider you must love the army. To be a good commander, you must be willing to order the death of the thing you love. We do not fear our own death you and I. But there comes a time...
We are never quite prepared for so many to die. Oh, we do expect the occasional empty chair. A salute to fallen comrades. But this war goes on and on and the men die and the price gets ever higher. We are prepared to loose some of us, but we are never prepared to loose all of us. And there is the great trap General. When you attack, you must hold nothing back. You must commit yourself totally. We are adrift here in a sea of blood and I want it to end. I want this to be the final battle.
While scrabman may not be calling for impeachment I think it's safe to say a vast majority of his party is. Scrabman could easily have save stated that this is not the way to go but he did not which can only mean he is not against this proposition.
I am not supporting Uncle Sam here but supporting eUSA. An impeachment would set a bad precedent. It will alienate the people who do in fact support him. We need to build not splinter.
My party and it's leader is not the biggest fan of what has been going on either but I strongly feel that we need to unite this country. Tossing the President now and getting a new one in will take at least another couple of days and then a new President will be in office for a week and a half before new elections take place.
People are mad at the president (in many instances rightly so), they are also mad at Congress (in many instances rightly so), but these people like it or not were elected by the people.
All this always seems to boil down to is people who don't much like or respect each other constantly trying to bring each other down. I guess that will be the fate of this eNation in time.
Right mngoose33. Then my favorite little troll popped up as will surely a few others who I've had to deal with using my leadership of the Forums. Not everyone agrees with the way that I Admin the eUSA Forums but I always do my best to find consensus. That is why I set up the Moderator system that we have now so that we have many voices and different people tending the garden instead of just the original 3 of us. The Forum is too big for just 3 of us just like the Presidency is too big to try to manage it alone as Sam has tried to do ... hence his resignations.
I probably won't be participating in this debate anymore after this post. I probably responded too much to Emerick last night but it was the first time that he's really engaged me since his Permaban from the eUSA Forums so some of those comments were an outgrowth of that. I'm done with him now and I'm not going to feel bad about it. You sometimes have to do things that don't seem diplomatic but I'm puzzled about Danylo's comment because I tried every type of diplomacy with Emerick before it led to this. Oh well.
Feel free to discuss whatever. I may take a little break from eRep till this has died down.
I think you mean "live long and prosper". 😛
I proposed this impeachment without any consideration of Scrab taking over. Sam has lost the confidence of the eUS. As I've said before, I would have proposed impeachment even if it was DF or Jewitt who was taking over instead of Scrab in the case of impeachment. The real question is whether Sam has violated his office and lost the faith and confidence of the country. Sadly, the answer is yes.
Jon Barack:
"In the last week, the Secretary of State, Quartermaster General, and Vice President have resigned."
I didn't resign. I was demoted and uMoFA Publius was promoted. Uncle Sam wanted someone who would be more war hungry. I'm not anti-war.. I just usually try to bring Sam off his pedestal and think a little more clearly when the thought of war crossed his mind.
Hear hear, Scrab. In all my criticism of the president and calls for a change in leadership, my worry has been that you would decline having such a mess handed to you. Your article indicates that you posess the prudent judgment and leadership our nation now requires.
All this has succeeded in doing is further dividing the eUSA which is exactly what it's enemies want.
This kind of hysteria leeds to alienation of prominent high level eUSA players and their defection to other countries or defection from the game. While many think, great I'm getting rid of an opponent you become weaker by losing strong eUS citizens.
So now when the next president makes a mistake we will impeach them as well??? I am by no means happy with the way things have been going but this is not the way to handle this matter.
"Also they think that you're a Nazi"
I don't, I wanted to build a e-shrine for scrabman
http://forums.erepublik.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=176&t=3611&start=60
Supported, Mr. Scrab.
The next 24-hours will be intense. But I'm looking forward to it.
@ Inwegen:
You are right. Thanks for pointing that out. Uncle Sam rules unilateraly, and dissenting voices are fired or quit.
"Unity" under one man with a bunker mentality is a recipe for national suicide.
The picture could just as easily be referring to this article.
scrabman: WTF IS THIS SHIT?