Join the new world

o7 nice article

Good luck

please read also

Government Spokesmen of Germany

News and War Show

http://www.erepublik.com/de/article/2412954/1/20

you could've just said "I'm up BigAnt's arse" and skipped all the rest of I'd think. No point in having an endorsement article pretending it isn't one.

[removed]

You conveniently missed out,

- Multi ratio
- Party's PTO'ed
- Attempted country PTO's
- Accounts banned
- Damage against UK

Need's more useful stats 😛

[removed]

Just looks like BA propaganda unless you give your party the whole picture. Or even bits of it, like how he PTO'ed TUP to run...

[removed]

I've never done anything illegal in game mechanics though, so ha.

I would have like a Rodney one, would have been nice and blank.

[removed]

I'm the oldest for sure, so that makes me the best candidate right?

Add "Rly cool avatar" in my bit.

[removed]

SPAM4CP

[removed]

BigAnt4CP

V

Yet more meaningless votes for another Serbian PTOer.

>citizenship-based referendum on alliance
>last month's citizenship passes given to almost 100 serbians

>logs in for the first time this month as CP
>has the audacity to criticise presidential candidates

Whether or not it's the first time the point IS valid. It's quite apparent that this is YET ANOTHER Serbian PTO attempt. PTOs will destroy this game.

The HW ratio is a bit unfair on older players who spent more time playing back when you needed to work consecutive days. They could have worked 29 days a month but the ratio would calculate that as 0.

I think I worked a year non stop in 2009.

Where's my shiny medal?

http://prntscr.com/3z2x6z

I've stopped working and training, does this mean I'm not active?

[removed]

Actually on retrospect and actually reading this article its a bit of a joke.

To claim I haven't been active in politics for many many months is wrong. I've ran for CP three times this year alone.

I also don't work or train, no point, not worth it because I will never and have never spent a penny on this game, and that is the only way that working and training can be worth it.

Why does BigAnt's points deserve in depth detail of their outlinesyet my points I have brought out so far do not as well? You skip past them.

I know you told me you favoured BigAnt but to claim this is some sort of unbiased article is a joke in itself.

You're so far up BA's arse that you are touching Dapper's feet.

Does it have to be an unbiased article? I understand where you are coming from, but to point out the obvious this article is aimed solely at UKPP members and it is written by the UKPP PP who has every right to present his own opinion to sway the rest of the party.

Democracy is fair, just not necessarily nice.

No it doesn't have to be an unbiased article. But he could have at least admitted that he was favouring BigAnt, which I know he is, and I don't have a problem with that, rather than pretending he is offering a balanced viewpoint on the whole situation.

Looking at this article as a singular independent event could perhaps present that view. However, let me share a small slice of history.

Alfa led a UKPP conference where is was agreed UKPP would support no one candidate and we could all vote for who we want for CP. Alfa even informed every member of this. After that was established Alfa and the rest of the party began voicing their opinion on which way they would vote, with all 3 candidates seeing varying degrees of support. Then this article came out, which granted doesn't use flattering language to describe you, but does in-fact link to all your published CP media so far. Even the other candidates that are running and their articles are mentioned.

If anyone took the time to follow those links they could make their own informed decision come vote day, regardless of Alfa's own personal opinion.

Long story short, if you were part of the party you'd know exactly where Alfa stands so the style in which this article was written would make more sense.

This article is far more honest than you perhaps realise.

Not all of us are favouring him, I for one am most definitely not, a dead rat is higher up my own personal table of candidates

The problem is, back in the old days when the lovely Sir Nick G was the figurehead, you (as well as others) often made the accusation that the UKPP was inheritedly racist. Alfagrem, who was of course the other half the the leading duo of the time, sees you as institutionally anti-UKPP and therefore will never support you.

The real UKPP position is more that apart from a few "new players" (who were set up around 2009) and a few oldfag friends of Sir Nick (who was good friends with BA when both were in UKPP), the rest are very anti-BA for all of the complete BS that BA pulled the last time he was in UKPP.

BigAnt for CP!

Big Ant is a traitor to the eUK and has consistently worked against the best interests of the eUK, remember him throwing his toys out of his pram and running off to Ireland to fight against the UK.
How can we ever trust him again?
Hope your members have longer or less selective memories than you.
Big Ant a Big Disaster.

[removed]

They don't like when truth facts are put down on paper. You have chosen certain facts and they don't like that. Same old

Yes same old false promises that you've no intention of keeping, that is one irrefutable truth

[removed]

Only Alfa and a couple others expressed any sort of support for BA behind the scenes. Everyone else was very strictly anti-BA as most of us remember what you were like when you were in the UKPP last time.

While the above article gives the impression that UKPP is BA leaning, the fact is it that is anything but... UKPP is leaning so far away from BA that the party has fallen over and is current standing on its head (and the feet where the head should be).

[removed]

I knows Vault guy, he's good people.

In view of the accusations of multi-accounting "people" could be an apt description.

If you list candidates' campaign promises - as Alfgrem has quite reasonably done - then BigAnt is an impressive prospect.

However, having talked to lots of people about this, the concern is not with what BigAnt tells us he'll do, it's what he actually does after election that's the problem.

For instance, Bigant made a series of impressive promises when he stood as TUP PP. Putting aside the fact that he shipped in a lot of his supporters to make sure he won, once he'd won the election things were very different. In the weeks since the election he's either failed to act on his promises or - in some notable cases - actively broken them. Overall, the TUP feels very much like a party with no leader at all at the moment, because our PP has been notable in his absence (despite being a very active player elsewhere).

My concern is, quite simply, that BigAnt will do the same thing as CP. That's why I won't vote for him.

Please please please. Do not vote for Bigant, he's a cretin