Its the economy, Stup..!!!!
Edward Bongsworth
Allow me to introduce myself. My name is Edward Bongsworth, I have been on eRep for several months now and mostly kept to myself. However, one thing has drive me to buy a newspaper and start making a difference in the eUS. That thing is economics.
In specific: The 1% import tax.
This is a ceterus paribus analysis of our current import tax system. (just an FYI for any economics majors out there. Theyll know what that means.)
Many eAmericans have tried to defend this policy. The primary argument: The low income taxes create a friendly business environment for foreign companies, who then sell their goods on American markets, and this massive gluttony of supply drives down consumer goods prices on important things such as food and guns to the point that it justifies the gold drain.
Wait, the gold drain? What's that?
Well its simple. Take this example: A Romanian company sells a Q5 weapon on an American market at the current price of $22.09. Removing the VAT, we arrive at $20.45 as the revenue for the good. Of this, we get $0.20 in income taxes. However, that other $20.25 goes to the Romanian companies' bank account, which then goes to their employees in the form of wages. American companies, however, can not do the same to the Romanian market. Their 99% import tax makes this impossible since no company could make a profit selling in Romania at this rate.
The end result? We have two scenarios:
1) The Romanian company sells the product and we lose, at bare minimum, $20.25 from our economy that we'll never see again. At current, thats about 0.57 gold disappearing every time. In addition to this, every sale going to a foreign company produces less revenue for our government.
2) American company sells the product and the economy grows, the money gets recycled, and the government makes more revenue than it otherwise would have.
More Gov Revenue = more ability to wage war = MORE DEAD REDCOATS
BUT WAIT!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm about to blow your mind America.
I did an analysis of the markets of America and three of our EDEN allies. It was to try to test the commonly held believe that lower import taxes create lower consumer goods prices through increased supply. I used a sample of Q1 & Q5 Food, Q1 & Q5 Weapons, and Q1 Moving Tickets to create a consumer price index, using gold, with current echange rates, as the measuring stick. I gathered price data from the US, Romania, Spain, and Poland. The data that follows is the price of one of each in local currency converted into gold, using the conversion rates and prices as they existed as of 15:15 on Day 804.
USA: 0.0151 Gld (Q1Food) + 0.1283 Gld (Q5Food) + 0.0899 Gld (Q1Weapon) + 0.6194 (Q5Weapon) + 0.1596 (Q1 MT) = TOTAL OF 1.0123 Gold (import tax rate: 1😵
Romania: 0.0137 (Q1F) + 0.1313 (Q5F) + 0.0806 (Q1W) + 0.5696 (Q5W) + 0.1581 (Q1MT) = TOTAL OF 0.9533 Gold (import tax rate: 99😵
Polan😛
0.0138 (Q1F) + 0.2157 (Q5F) + 0.0810 (Q1W) + 0.6103 (Q5W) + 0.1506 (Q1MT) = TOTAL OF 1.0714 (import tax rate: 99😵
Spain: 0.0167 (Q1F) + 0.1389 (Q5F) + 0.1069 (Q1W) + 0.6841 (Q5W) + 0.1981 (Q1MT) = TOTAL OF 1.1447 (import tax rate: 10😵
WHAT THIS DATA MEANS:
This conclusively shows that there is no correlation between lowering import taxes and getting cheaper consumer goods. Some would argue it has to do with the pegging, but Poland has a low peg (1 gold = 33.33 PLN) and Romania has a high peg (1 gold = 52.63 RON), yet both have comparable if not lower consumer goods prices.
Why did we think this was the case at one point? Well for a good reason: It works in RL economics. This is how Walmart and many RL companies have made their profits. But the one imporant thing that was NEVER factored in is something call ECONOMIES OF SCALE. It is an economics term that basically says that more of a product you produce, the more efficient you become at it, and the cheaper you can then sell it for. It is the basis for supply-side economics. BUT IT DOESNT WORK IN EREPUBLIK!!!! and here's why: There's no economies of scale in eRepublik!!!!!! I will say that again for emphasis: THERE IS NO ECONOMIES OF SCALE IN EREPUBLIK, SO ITS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SUPPLY SIDE ECONOMICS TO FUNCTION. That is to say, you get the same increase in productivity in going from skill 4 to 4.02 as you do going from 20 to 20.02. Do the math yourself using the porductivity formula, its true. And any company owners can tell you, no matter how many goods you make it is still the same cost for each additonal item. This doesnt work with raw materials, but with manufacturing in eRep it holds true. Thats why this article is addressing manufactured goods and not raw materials.
CONSEQUENCES OF THIS REALIZATION:
So if economies of scale don't work in eRep, and that's what we're basing our 1% import tax philosophy on, what is the effect of this economics error on our government? Well I'm glad you asked.
1) Government loses revenue. Increased money going to foreign companies, means less profits for American companies so they have to pay lower wages, which then means less revenue for the government in the areas of Income tax (lower wages creates less tax revenue) and VAT (lower wages leads to less consumer spending and thus lower VAT revenue).
And remember.... More Government Revenue = more war = MORE DEAD REDCOATS
2) Hurts player retention. The gluttonous market has created a situation in which it is almost impossible for upstart Q1 companies to make a profit. I challenge you to go do the math. Imagine this: If its been the goal of someone's eLife to create their own company, then they buy one after finally spending the months needed to collect 20 gold (or worse yet, spending RL money to buy it) , then only to realize that their own government has created economic conditions that make it impossible for them to prosper. Its rather demoralizing. Foreign companies often have the luxury of income taxes below 10% and VATs lower than 5% at home, along with domestic markets that are safe from foreign competitors. American businesses enjoy no such advantages.
C)The dreaded gold drain I mentioned earlier. Our economy is leaking gold slowly.
WE MUST ACKNOWLEDGE OUR ECONOMIC SHORTCOMINGS. WE MUST ADOPT THE BONGSWORTH PLAN.
What is the Bongsworth Plan? It's Simple. Raise Import taxes to 10-12% (on manufacturing goods only). This would accomplish a number of goals:
A) Create Government Revenue
😎
Bring Profit back to American businesses, thus improving both profit margins and domestic wages.
C) Still gives us the foreign goods we need! If an artificial price bubble is created in an industry or there is a shortage of supply, the foreign company can still jump in there to fill the void and make a healthy profit.
D) MOST IMPORTANTLY, It would stop the gold drain and improve our eUS economy.
The best ideas for improving the economy are player retention and more warfare, and thankfully both major candidates seem dedicated to these goals. BUT, they are easier said than done, and this is something that can improve the economy in the mean time. I have messaged both major candidate asking for opinions on this plan and will present to you a follow up article with their positions, and (possibly) an endorcement. Subscribe if you wish to see their responses!!!!!!!!
Cheers,
Edward Bongsworth
Editor-in-Chief, The Bongsworth Chronicles
Comments
im just going to go ahead and wait for sydiot to show up...
Voted+subbed
Voted just for the Clinton throwback.
lol, I believe that sydiot will see the wisdom in this sense this annalisis is very true and he has had to deal first hand with the decrease in tax revenue caused by our current tax system. eUs companies are drowning in there own inability to turn reasonable profit. I would personally add that in order to give smaller companies a little brething room we need to adjust our vat. by raising the vat 1-2 points it forces higher Q compnies to employ higher Q labor and opens up our lower skill work force for lower Q companies. This will mean lower wages but it will also keep prices low do to the increase in supply.
WOW... very nice... and long...
You know what's funny? I tried making this point in a gentle way in tonight's Libertarian Presidential Steering Committee debate. I believe my call for flexibility in tax policy was a contributing factor in my failure to obtain the LPSC endorsement. Economics isn't so much dogma as it is correlation/causation study...
Nice article. Voted.
Your data is a snapshot and isn't reliable. If you want economic data you need to study it over time with more than a single sample size. You have a well-thought out argument, but it doesn't change the fact that
1) business profits 😕= higher wages
2) stuff is better at doing damage than gold
3) our import tax policy is meant to benefit not only us, but our allies (since that's who gets to import to us)
4) nothing import taxes will do will prevent people being dissappointed when they buy a useless Q1 company and try to compete against the glut of existing companies
5) imported goods are frequently the cheapest goods at moments of crisis because other countries do not have identical demand conditions that we do (meaning we have an extra ceiling on the price of goods during major battles)
6) more Gold will not help our economy, demand for our PRODUCTS will help our economy. More Gold 😕= more demand.
Wow mate, awesome.
Nice job. I fully support higher import taxes on domestic goods and resources.
The problem with this free trade idiocy is that we are the ONLY major country subscribing to it. It is great for our allies because they can dump their overproduction on our larger consumer base without worrying about competition in their home markets.
Before this project was undertaken, all of our major allies should have been on board. The eWTO or something should have discussed this. As it is, we are the world's fleamarket and it's hurting our businesses, taxes, and wages.
Wow, that was quite a good article. Subbed and voted
I inhaled your ideas
Nice job. Voted.
I made a similar point a few weeks ago: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/eus-taxes-are-upside-down-1148561/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/eus-[..]/1/20
Snap-shot data- check
RL bias- check
popular opinions- check
incorrect assumptions- check
Almost completely off the mark- check!
Whichever candidate doesn't support this better not get elected.
If you think YOUR economy is CRAZY, wait til you read what this Canadian nutjob wants to do to Canada's economy:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/octavian-f-for-prime-minister-the-only-real-alternative-1181025/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/octa[..]/1/20
Alright, you have my attention. Well done. I've had my headphones on during the election cycle.
Voted, good article
This analysis is CORRECT because there is a finite level of demand that can be supported in ANY NATION. Unlike in RL where supply side arguments are real and whole, in eRepublik there is an absolute level of demand for food (one per day per citizen) and housing (one per person, a max of one per q level). I exclude Moving Tickets because that market is subject to cyclical an incidental demand depending upon 1. Congressional Elections and 2. military deployments. Weapons are different and even during times of HIGH DEMAND (i.e., a meaningful battle or continuous campaign) there is still a realistic and fairly absolute ceiling of 6 weapons per person (assuming gifting). Gifts are totally dependent upon battle conditions and is also subject to the cyclical demand that faces moving tickets - only moving and fighting in a battle dictate demand for goods. Besides, there is an absolute limit on gift consumption anyway of 10 Q1s, 5 Q2s, 3 Q3s + 1 Q1, 2 Q4s + 1 Q2 or 2 Q1s or 2Q5s per citizen. Period.
If you look at consumption limits you also need to consider that there is INELASTIC DEMAND in food. That is, demand won't decrease either (unless the price is so damn high that people either buy abroad or quit the game altogether). These two concepts mean that that no matter HOW LOW THE PRICE GOES in our market we're facing ABSOLUTE LIMITS on consumption.
I believe that we've been dominated so much by the free traders in this debate that considering any other alternative in economics is akin to heresy and automatically labels the proponent as "unserious."
Outstanding work.
Now if only we make use of this information.
Voted x 3 & subscribed.
I've been trying to say this for months, but I couldn't be bothered to type it all out. When I have brought the subject up, I've gotten shouted down with nonsensical, sound-bite garbage like "STUFF > GOLD", and basically humiliated for challenging the status quo.
Post hoc ad ergo propter hoc seems to be the eUS government's modus operandi.
PQman 23, what you are saying is true, except for the cetris paribus assumption, which aint even that relevant for his argument made. What he is stating is the following, the domestic market is large enough aka there is enough competition to prevent dramatic price increases.
Next he shows that a lot of major countries protect their economy by using import tarives. Then he continues stating that because of our free trade we are losing gold to these foreign companies. While we are unable to export to the large relevant markets in erepublic. Free trade is nice, but if non are joining in it free trade simply wont work.
Wages, prices they do not really mean a lot. His main argument simply says that because of the low import we lose gold and since gold is power we lose power.
Nothing more nothing less.
As another economist I believe he has a valid point and his assumption that the rest remains equal simply makes it a lot easier to analyse the market, but this does not really affect the results and conclusions of his argument.